Monday, July 15, 2019

How can we better understand what is going on with climate change?

https://www.quora.com/How-can-we-better-understand-what-is-going-on-with-climate-change

My reply:

To really understand what is going on with climate change, you must start by junking any and all lit. from the CO2 AGW crowd, run by the evil globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC, which pushes the absurd claim that CO2 in the atmosphere “traps” heat and therefore warms, not the atmosphere, but the Earth’s surface, without explaining the difference. What’s their motive in hijacking science? Greed for power to foist a Marxist world government. Not that every climate scientist is in on the conspiracy, there’s just a lot of useful idiots in the crowd.

DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government

Here’s the main three things to see why the CO2 AGW theory is nonsense pushed in an attempt to scare you into giving up your wealth, income, and political sovereignty so the Marxists can rule you:
First, they willfully omit mention of the lapse rate, an automatic drop of air temperature with height, which makes any trapped heat disappear into the frigid layer surrounding the Earth

Lapse rate - Wikipedia

Second, they push the totally lying and cunning claim that without Earth’s atmosphere the Sun could only heat the Surface to -18C, therefore there must be another source of heat from the atmosphere (namely CO2), when anybody who has cooked a steak on a hot car hood knows that the Sun is way more powerful than that. In fact, the Earth’s real avg. temp of 15C (59F) is produced only by the Sun, and CO2 has nothing to do with it. Rather, the entire atmosphere cools the surface at night by convecting the heat to space, and CO2 is just part of that. And the iron laws of thermodynamics prohibit any body from rewarming itself with its own heat, no matter how sophisticated the tricks.
And the iron laws of thermodynamics prohibit any body from rewarming itself with its own heat, no matter how sophisticated the tricks.

Earth cannot heat itself by it's own radiation | PSI Intl
A Mathematical Stunt Convinces Many.
Convection - Wikipedia

Third, they want you to believe that CO2 is itself an evil pollutant, when it is the basis of all life on Earth, the gas that plants breathe to launch photosynthesis. Below 180 ppm photosynthesis ceases. Before industrialization it was 280 ppm, and right now it’s only 415 ppm, with the increase already showing a great greening of the Earth. And these clowns want to take CO2 back out of the atmosphere? A greenhouse operator pumps in CO2 to 1000 ppm or more for optimal plant growth, so the use of the term greenhouse gas is actually some kind of in-joke, not science.

CO2 since 1800
Carbon Is Not A Synonym For Carbon Dioxide
Pope gets schooled: Carbon dioxide not a 'satanic gas' - WND
Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds
Managing CO2 in Your Grow Space

Save much time and frustration by reading the leading essay disproving the CO2 AGW theory and exposing it as politically motivated, by moi:

TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change



No comments:

Post a Comment

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago

Aug. 31, 2011. Giant pipe and balloon to pump water into the sky in climate experiment

May 31, 2013. Scientists find that higher CO2 levels green arid regions

Mar. 30, 2015. Higher atmospheric CO2 levels causing boom in vegetation

Aug. 2015. 'Unprecedented' volcanic eruption released enough water vapor to heat Earth: report

Aug. 15, 2017. Scientists find 91 new volcanoes miles beneath Antarctica's thick ice sheet

How Much CO2 Do Volcanoes Emit?

Will a major volcanic eruption fix climate change? - James Matkin

Part of the heat is coming from beneath our feet

Did any volcanoes erupt in 2020?

T.L. Winslow (TLW, the Historyscoper (tm)

My Blog List

Total Pageviews