https://irrationalfear.substack.com/p/the-first-heatwave-of-the-year-and
My reply:
Did recent headlines warning of a coming climate Armageddon get to you yet? Kaching! go the cash registers of the global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC octopus.
Climate science has long been hijacked by global Marxists to weaponize it to scam trillions from people afraid of an invisible dragon in the sky. They have seized control of the PC press and Internet to marginalize free discussion and criticism, allowing them orchestrate a day-by-day Big Lie program of lying agitprop that amounts to little more than climate porn to keep the steal going.
When it comes to record temperatures, the big giveaway is not record monthly or yearly temp in some limited region, but the yearly high temp globally, which if there were real global warming would surely rise steadily. Too bad, it hasn't risen since 1913, way back before the rise of Big Oil.
No wonder they never mention it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highest_temperature_recorded_on_Earth
Instead, they invented the fake concept of a global annual surface temp. (GAT) which throws physics out with the bathwater to create official numbers based on lying statistics that they can make come out to anything they want ,with no way to falsify them.
Let's say that the northern half of the Earth has a GAT of +20C, and the southern half has a GAT of +30C. What's the combined GAT?
Zonk! There isn't one. Isolated thermal regions have different temperatures, period, and any attempt to average them is pure mental masturbation, not physics, which only predicts that if they aren't thermally isolated they will attempt to equalize. Think of two beakers of water on a lab bench that are thermally insulated from each other. There's temperature 1 and temperature 2, and physical no avg. temperature (t1 + t2)/2 anywhere.
www.historyscoper.com/whatistheuseofglobaltemperature.html
No surprise that the underlying greenhouse effect is a hoax, no more physical than the Boogie Man or Easter Bunny. It can't exist unless the atmosphere is a black body radiator like the surfaces of the Earth and Sun, that can be heated by pure radiation. It can't, and the rest is Marxist propaganda.
After many attempts at justifying it that got shot down, they now claim that atmospheric CO2 molecules block energy flow to space, causing GAT to rise by pure magic, as if solar radiation alone doesn't heat the Earth's surface, and the rest are various cooling processes. Energy per se isn't heat, which only exists in molecules, and radiation energy can only heat the molecules in black bodies, so an unmeasurable top of atmosphere energy balance is irrelevant.
www.historyscoper.com/thereisnogreenhouseeffect.html
My reply:
Where's a mention of the elephant in the room, global Marxism and the U.N. IPCC global Marxist politician-run octopus? Not only the 1.5C and 2.0C numbers but the concept of global avg. surface temperature (GAT) are fictions created for the purpose of pushing degrowth depop. policies to undermine Big Oil, pillar of capitalism with the hope of foisting global Marxism in the chaos. It's pure propaganda, not science. The GAT values are collected, computed, and announced by a global Marxist central committee for purely political reasons, and have no relation to reality, only ammo for their political extortion program. If there were no global Marxism nobody would notice any global climate change or worry about Big Oil being an existential threat. Rather, it's global Marxism that's the existential threat, so quit playing along with them and fight them.
If the northern half of the globe had a surface temperature of +15C and the southern half had a surface temperature of -15C, what is the global avg. surface temperature GAT? Answer: NONE. GAT doesn't exist. There would just be two regions of the globe with different temperatures. Ditto if you divide the globe into a million pieces. Averages of averages yield mathematical garbage unless strict rules are observed, which the IPCC never does.
www.historyscoper.com/whatistheuseofglobaltemperature.html
www.historyscoper.com/thereisnogreenhouseeffect.html
www.historyscoper.com/whatisthedifference.html
It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.
Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).
Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.
The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.
So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.
This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.
So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.
It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad
It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.
Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago
Aug. 31, 2011. Giant pipe and balloon to pump water into the sky in climate experiment
May 31, 2013. Scientists find that higher CO2 levels green arid regions
Mar. 30, 2015. Higher atmospheric CO2 levels causing boom in vegetation
Aug. 2015. 'Unprecedented' volcanic eruption released enough water vapor to heat Earth: report
Aug. 15, 2017. Scientists find 91 new volcanoes miles beneath Antarctica's thick ice sheet
How Much CO2 Do Volcanoes Emit?
Will a major volcanic eruption fix climate change? - James Matkin
Part of the heat is coming from beneath our feet
Did any volcanoes erupt in 2020?
T.L. Winslow (TLW, the Historyscoper (tm)
