Reply:
The global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC octopus of kept scientists, academics, journalists, and politicians have never been honestly studying the causes of Earth's climate. They have been pushing the hoax that CO2 emissions cause global warming to make useful idiots who will bow to their demands for hundreds of trillions to end them, not to save us from future runaway global warming, but for redistribution to poor countries for their idea of Marxist social-racial justice. No surprise, their computer climate models (CCMs) are pure GIGO that suck up massive amounts of energy for nothing.
The IPCC has set real climate science back 30 years with their mad attempts to frame atmospheric CO2 as causing global warming, even though fundamental thermal physics makes this impossible. Too bad, I'm not making billions and demanding hundreds of trillions more, so nobody listens to me, but I long ago disproved the IPCC CO2-driven global warming fake physics hoax for all to see. After many attempts I've simplified it to the max and made it so elegant and easy a 5th grader can understand it. Don't expect any IPCC scientists to read it or want to openly debate it because it threatens their lifetime income and big plans, but truth trumps politics so I'm hoping for a grassroots backlash that laughs the IPCC off. www dot historyscoper dot com slash whyaregreenhousegastheoriesdeadwrong dot html
Why Are Greenhouse Gas Theories Dead Wrong?, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2022/02/03/why-the-constant-fabrications/
Reply:
What is the motivation of the global Marxist politician-run IPCC's kept scientists to fabricate evidence to support their CO2-driven global warming hoax? How about $275 trillion?
https://budbromley.blog/2022/01/26/consulting-firm-mckinsey-estimates-9-trillion-per-year-cost-for-climate-accords/
The IPCC great train robbery is speeding down the tracks while most people are uninterested and/or fooled, and only a handful of us are awake and trying to speak truth to power from our miserable corners of the Web that they can't control yet. Quora still provides a great soapbox if you're willing to test your skills at exposition and debate.It has 200 million users who average 300 million views a month.
Here's a post that got 55K views:
https://newrealclimatescience.quora.com/https-www-quora-com-Why-wont-conservatives-just-admit-that-the-heat-dome-causing-extreme-temperatures-in-the-western-U
Here's my latest post exposing the mechanics behind the big IPCC CO2-driven global warming hoax:
https://www.quora.com/How-does-carbon-dioxide-maintain-the-temperature-of-Earth/answer/TL-Winslow
It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.
Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).
Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.
The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.
So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.
This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.
So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.
It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad
It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.
Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago
Aug. 31, 2011. Giant pipe and balloon to pump water into the sky in climate experiment
May 31, 2013. Scientists find that higher CO2 levels green arid regions
Mar. 30, 2015. Higher atmospheric CO2 levels causing boom in vegetation
Aug. 2015. 'Unprecedented' volcanic eruption released enough water vapor to heat Earth: report
Aug. 15, 2017. Scientists find 91 new volcanoes miles beneath Antarctica's thick ice sheet
How Much CO2 Do Volcanoes Emit?
Will a major volcanic eruption fix climate change? - James Matkin
Part of the heat is coming from beneath our feet
Did any volcanoes erupt in 2020?
T.L. Winslow (TLW, the Historyscoper (tm)
.jpg)
