My reply:
Dr Hugh Hunt, deputy director of the Centre for Climate Repair at Cambridge University, who has been studying this for the best part of three decades.
Once again the elephant in the room is ignored, namely, GLOBAL MARXISM.
So-called climate scientists are really just leftist environmentalists posing as scientists. In reality their Communist puppet masters tell them what to think and what conclusions to reach, namely, that Big Oil is bad for its harmless CO2 emissions, and the West must rush to dismantle it to save the climate, when all they really want is to shut down capitalism and foist global Marxism, for which goal they'll push any hoax that works.
If you don't 'get' the hardcore Marxists behind the manmade global warming hoax, then you're out of your league and doomed to lose the big game and see your children doomed to horrible slavery.
Luckily they still can't completely control the Internet, and I studied the history and have published free timeline documentaries showing the evolution of the Big Lie, piling one hoax on top of another while using the standard Marxist playbook of doing everything they can to stifle criticism. And what's really sad is that so few seem to care, as I found out when my popular account on Quora with thousands of articles and millions of views was summarily scrubbed from the Internet on the orders of some global Marxist puppet masters and nobody but me uttered a peep of protest.
If there were any real independent scientists left in academia, they'd love my work conclusively disproving every aspect of the global Marxist global warming hoax that could shut down the Big Steal, but even the so-called climate denier community seems uninterested, else they'd feature it on all their sites and help teach the world how easy it is to disprove their entire house of cards, starting with the greenhouse effect, which can't exist because the atmosphere isn't a black body, and gases can't be warmed by pure radiation.
Instead, even the author of this article seems to buy the hoax that there is any global warming in the first place, based on announcements of global avg. surface temperature (GAT), when common sense shows that there can't be any such thing as a global temperature that can be measured and officially announced, which is just what the U.N. IPCC global Marxist politician-run octopus does every day to steal trillions to waste on boondoggles.
One doesn't need a measure of global temperature to know that the Earth is heating up, just a list of the maximum recorded surface temperature anywhere on the surface each year, which would have to be systematically rising. Instead, the last time it rose was way back in 1913, before there was a Big Oil to steal blind. That's why they use fake statistics that they can control to make it seem like doomsday is approaching, and it's too bad that so many rich and powerful people buy it without question.
I published the killer bullets that shoot down the global Marxists forever, and give them away for free, and I don't know whether to laugh or cry when I see them marginalized in the stampede for the trillions.
No offense intended, but I've read everything on the subject, and know that if you're at all interested in the science of Earth climate you're wasting your time studying anybody else's works. That's the bottom line. If your readers don't hunker down and study, then start spreading the knowledge that make the masses of sheeple start thinking for themselves, the world is headed for a new Dark Ages without any dimming of the Sun needed.
http://www.historyscoper.com/newrealclimatesciencecourse.html
http://www.historyscoper.com/whatistheuseofglobaltemperature.html
http://www.historyscoper.com/climatescope.html
http://www.quoracensorship.html
It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.
Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).
Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.
The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.
So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.
This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.
So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.
It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad
It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.
Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago
Aug. 31, 2011. Giant pipe and balloon to pump water into the sky in climate experiment
May 31, 2013. Scientists find that higher CO2 levels green arid regions
Mar. 30, 2015. Higher atmospheric CO2 levels causing boom in vegetation
Aug. 2015. 'Unprecedented' volcanic eruption released enough water vapor to heat Earth: report
Aug. 15, 2017. Scientists find 91 new volcanoes miles beneath Antarctica's thick ice sheet
How Much CO2 Do Volcanoes Emit?
Will a major volcanic eruption fix climate change? - James Matkin
Part of the heat is coming from beneath our feet
Did any volcanoes erupt in 2020?
T.L. Winslow (TLW, the Historyscoper (tm)
