The Antarctic Volcanoes Project Blog: How does excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere lead to climatic change?

Thursday, July 11, 2019

How does excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere lead to climatic change?

https://www.quora.com/How-does-excess-carbon-dioxide-in-the-atmosphere-lead-to-climatic-change

My reply:
https://www.quora.com/How-does-excess-carbon-dioxide-in-the-atmosphere-lead-to-climatic-change/answer/TL-Winslow

It can’t. CO2 greenhouse warming is a scientific hoax with ulterior motives, promoted by the insidious globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC backed by James Hansen and his org. NASA.
The original idea that CO2 makes the Earth’s atmosphere into a greenhouse was always moose hockey, because it’s glass that traps heat, and CO2 isn’t glass. No glass no greenhouse, end of story. The Sun is a Planck radiator at 5,800 K. The visual component cuts through the atmosphere almost untouched, heating the Earth’s surface, which reaches maybe 120F = 322K. It then becomes a Planck radiator, radiating its energy back to space at a rate determined by its temperature, and at a wavelength profile determined by the Stefan-Boltzmann T^4 Law.

Without no atmosphere on Earth, the SB Law would rule surface temperatures via pure radiation, but the gigantic atmosphere intervenes and absorbs a large proportion of the heat energy directly at the surface via conduction, then slowly rises it to space via convection, moderating the surface temperature swings, just like an iron bar stuck in the fire that stays cool at the handle end, or like a capacitor in an electrical cruit. CO2 has no special power to interfere with this. Instead, it’s a tiny part of it.

The rest of the modern modified CO2 greenhouse warming theory is moose hockey, because it is based on a series of hoaxes about radiation alone running the show, but not the radiation emitted by the only solid surfaces involved, namely, the surfaces of the Sun and Earth, rather imaginary surfaces in the sky where the SB Law doesn’t apply. They even try to er, snow you with fancy talk about Earth’s thermal equilibrium, as if the sky can tell the surface what to do, when the SB Law is purely local, based on the local temperature at the time, and doesn’t care about the environment because it helps make it, not vice-versa. In short, the Greenhouse warming theory is a hoax not worthy of any credit, despite the gigantic IPCC colossus and its kept scientists, academics, and journalists, hence any climate change scenarios built on it are like, you guessed it, castles in the air.

Real climate change is caused by changes in the Sun. On Earth we’re powerless to control climate, except in a negative sense by cooling it via nuclear winter, tree cutting et al. In fact, without the wonderful fossil fuel industry we’d be helpless. to survive extreme temperatures. The entire empire being built by the IPCC is a sick attempt at global govt., and can’t do anything for the climate, but it can make the world into a socialist hellhole like Venezuela.

Climate alarmists aren’t trying to save the planet, they want communism in America
DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government

My complete devastating unanswerable disproof of the CO2 greenhouse warming theory, still waiting for Hansen to admit defeat and give it up:

TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THSQqsYvL9o
James Hansen, Ph.D. - The Coming Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save Humanity - Offstage

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago