https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/03/27/atmospheric-fingerprint/
My reply:
[[Cooling of the stratosphere, due to a higher concentration of CO2, is logical. CO2 is a major radiator of thermal radiation in the stratosphere, and more of it should cool that layer. Likewise, if the intensity of solar radiation increased, oxygen and ozone in the stratosphere would absorb more UV (ultraviolet) radiation, which should warm the stratosphere, not cool it.]]
CO2 radiation cools the stratosphere? Is that like Mister Freeze's freeze ray? What comic book universe did that physics come from?
When will the IPCC greenhouse gas warming hoax be laughed off by this blog? Every thing they do to give it credibility is an atrocity. CO2's 15 micron -80C radiation can't melt an ice cube.
(141) TL Winslow's answer to What are the features of greenhouse gases? - Quora
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/03/24/basic-climate-physics-10/
My reply:
Why does WUWT keep publishing nonsense from the old school of climate science that pretends to criticize the IPCC CO2-driven global warming hoax but actually protects it with such convoluted gobbledy-gook that nobody can understand what they're saying?
It's always been so easy to prove that all greenhouse gas theories are dead wrong because they deny the existence or efficacy of Nature's ironclad Second Law of Thermodynamics (Entropy).
Instead of publishing rehashes of this old school nonsense that overcomplicates the simple, WUWT should be publishing and constantly promoting my killer disproof of the IPCC's greenhouse gas warming theories until the public laughs it out of existence. The truth that will set people free is that the emperor has no clothes, it's not complicated, it's so simple that even a 5th grader can grasp it.
How many hundred million pageviews does WUWT have? Sometimes I suspect it's a false flag op owned by the IPCC. It's sure been doing them yeoman service by pretending to be independent critics who never go in for the kill but seem to be staging an endless diversion play of trying to calculate the number of angels that fit on the head of a pin to keep the big bucks the IPCC demands rolling in.
Here's my killer disproof, that is begging for a fatcat who can get it into the hands of every educated person (h.s. grad?) in the Western world:
Why Are Greenhouse Gas Theories Dead Wrong?, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™
Why would anybody want to finance that? To save the world from a preventable disaster. How many times do I have to publicize this demand of the IPCC for not trillions but hundreds of trillions of dollars to save us from their own hoax? Every one of those dollars would be a boondoggle. These are desperate times and require desperate measures.
Consulting firm McKinsey estimates $9 trillion per year cost for climate accords | budbromley
I hereby grant permission to reprint my killer bullet article in full with copyright notice intact. Since it's an html document filled with hyperlinks and images it can just be linked to with appropriate fanfare and get good results, or rehosted on a server capable of handling higher traffic.
https://naturalgasnow.org/carbon-dioxide-is-life-not-a-pollutant/
My reply:
[[It is accepted by experts on both sides of the issue that carbon dioxide retains small amounts of solar radiation — heat — that otherwise would escape into outer space.]]
Zonk! The lie that never die pops up again.
Atmospheric CO2 molecules only absorb infrared radiation photons from Earth's surface at one wavelength, 15 microns, and almost immediately reemits them, leaving them at the same temperature.
The radiation itself is not heat! It's the same emitted by an iron rod chilled to -80C, colder than dry ice. It's closer to microwave, and has no heating power on Earth's surface unless it's already at or below -80C.It just bounces around heating nothing until entropy harmlessly disperses it.
It's time everybody gave up this hoax and started laughing at the U.N. IPCC octopus that still pushes it.
http://www.historyscoper.com/whyaregreenhousegastheoriesdeadwrong.html
http://www.historyscoper.com/isglobalwarmingahoax.html
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/03/07/infrared-forcing-by-greenhouse-gases/
My reply:
[[This paper has been written for readers with a strong background in quantitative sciences, who know little about radiation transfer in Earth’s atmosphere. So we include material that is common knowledge to a small number of experts, but little known to the larger scientific community.]]
Whew! Get me some 2x strength Febreze spray!
The lie that never dies rears its ugly head again, this time spread by professional physicists who should have known better and led the fight against it for years.
CO2 and other "greenhouse gases" aren't real. They're a fake physics hoax pushed by the global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC as part of their long war to destroy capitalism and economic growth and burn down the West so they can build their Marxist utopia on its ashes. It was never about science, but about hijacking science for political gain. Less than a week ago WUWT republished a great article by Lord Monckton exposing the global Communist conspiracy to spread it. Did anybody read it?
It's sick that so many physicists are so weak at the basics of thermal physics that they had a cakewalk with the older ones who could have stopped them like these two, and after taking over academia, no problem miseducating youngsters who have to learn their catechism to advance academically, like an established Church propagating the geocentric theory from generation to generation.
What a bait and switch that the authors fell for. It's not about "radiation transfer in Earth's atmosphere", it's about Nature's ironclad Second Law of Thermodynamics AKA Entropy, which makes it impossible for any gas in Earth's atmosphere to reheat Earth's surface with its own heat, which came only from solar radiation.
To say that atmospheric CO2, H2O, or CH4 cause global surface temperatures to rise even one iota is like saying that some woman is a little pregnant. Nature is being mocked by Marxists using science as a mask, and the rest is moose hockey.
I've spent years broadcasting from my miserable soapbox on the Web how easy it is to disprove the IPCC's greenhouse gas warming hoax, but since I spent most of my life studying thermal physics I can't be sure what's obvious to others and what isn't. I already listed the url with my killer bullet disproof here on WUWT in the comments section and got little response. It's sad that WUWT doesn't wake up and recognize my article and make it a feature article with a prominent link to it on every page permanently, and help me find a billionaire who can make a copy available to every person in the fossil fuel-using West to stop all the IPCC's insidious plans to ruin our future before they do real damage.
Since WUWT readers know more thermal physics than most, here's my most simple concentrated disproof of "greenhouse gas warming":
We're all adults here, so why keep this killer knowledge as an in-joke? We need to find a deep pockets billionaire who will peel off a billion or two to educate the masses regardless of all efforts of the U.N.-Big Teach, er, Big Tech cabal to prevent it. Then hopefully the masses will throw off their yokes and laugh at the emperor's new clothes and force them to disband and give the money back. Too bad that billionaire Bill Gates dropped out of college before he could even get to senior level courses on physics or else he could have done all this work for me and I could have used the time to solve other big world class problems.
ACTION NEEDED!
Here's my free Web article explaining my killer disproof of the IPCC global warming hoax. Permission is hereby granted for republication as long as it's kept whole and intact including my copyright notice. I'm an amateur by choice, not supported by Big Oil, but I can't be bought and am only worried about my reputation and would welcome a free will donation of a few million with no strings attached so that I can move permanently to Hawaii in my old age. Sorry, less than that would be a nuisance, so don't try chipping me dimes.
Why Are Greenhouse Gas Theories Dead Wrong?, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™
I notice that WUWT doesn't even list my cool blog linking to all the articles on climate pro and con that I read every day, including here. Subscribe to the free daily email.
The Antarctic Volcanoes Project Blog
It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.
Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).
Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.
The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.
So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.
This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.
So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.
It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad
It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.
Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago
Aug. 31, 2011. Giant pipe and balloon to pump water into the sky in climate experiment
May 31, 2013. Scientists find that higher CO2 levels green arid regions
Mar. 30, 2015. Higher atmospheric CO2 levels causing boom in vegetation
Aug. 2015. 'Unprecedented' volcanic eruption released enough water vapor to heat Earth: report
Aug. 15, 2017. Scientists find 91 new volcanoes miles beneath Antarctica's thick ice sheet
How Much CO2 Do Volcanoes Emit?
Will a major volcanic eruption fix climate change? - James Matkin
Part of the heat is coming from beneath our feet
Did any volcanoes erupt in 2020?
T.L. Winslow (TLW, the Historyscoper (tm)
.jpg)
