Basic Climate Physics #10

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/03/24/basic-climate-physics-10/ 

My reply:

Why does WUWT keep publishing nonsense from the old school of climate science that pretends to criticize the IPCC CO2-driven global warming hoax but actually protects it with such convoluted gobbledy-gook that nobody can understand what they're saying?

It's always been so easy to prove that all greenhouse gas theories are dead wrong because they deny the existence or efficacy of Nature's ironclad Second Law of Thermodynamics (Entropy).

1. All coalesced (liquid, solid) bodies are good Planck black body radiators, which absorb and emit radiation at all wavelengths. In the Earth climate system, the main black bodies are the surfaces of the Sun and Earth. No gas can ever a black body because the gas molecules are forever bouncing around against each other and can only share heat energy via contact and conduction. They never absorb or emit radiation except if they're polar (have electric dipoles) and then only one photon at a time at certain wavelengths in their electrons depending on their dipole structure. CO2, H2O, and CH4 are polar, and the IPCC claims that they're "greenhouse gases" and wants us to fear them.
2. For a black body B to reach a certain temperature T, it has to absorb heat energy sufficient to raise its temperature to T based on its heat capacity of so many degrees C per Joule. The black body A whose radiation is heating B must have a temperature equal to or greater than T, because of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which says that no heat energy can be transferred from body A to B unless the temperature of A is greater than the temperature of B, else there is no energy transfer. That's why nobody has patented a dry ice-powered microwave oven that can cook a turkey.
3. All along the way the black body attempts to cool itself by combining its energy modes via the Boltzmann distribution and emitting radiation out of its surfaces along a power-wavelength curve based solely on T and always constrained to increase entropy maximally for the given internal energy. The S-B Law is just the Planck black body radiation law integrated over all wavelengths, showing that the total power rises as T^4, which is what they call color temperature (change in color of an iron rod stuck into a fire). In contrast, the total radiant energy capability of atmospheric gases is trifling compared to black bodies, because photon-by-photon absorption/emission that's not even dependent on atmospheric temperature can't touch the T^4 power law for black bodies.
4. Only radiant energy from the 5500C Sun reaches Earth's surface and slowly heats it up while it keeps trying to cool via Planck black body radiation, conduction/convection, and evaporation. Usual maximum Earth surface temperatures rarely exceed 50C, so because of entropy the total surface radiation energy is a fraction of the original absorbed solar energy, and gets worse the hotter the surface gets because entropy dispersion loss rises as T^3.
5. Now what does the IPCC claim? That a tiny fraction of this surface radiation energy if turned back can reheat the surface with its own heat, and even make it reach a higher temperature than the Sun gave it. Here's where the IPCC liars start their deception play, by claiming that the S-B Law can be inverted, so that the total power from a black body at temperature T can restore that temperature if returned, when it has already experienced irreversible loss due to entropy dispersion.
6. Greenhouse gases are all a bald-faced lie. Even if they returned 100% of surface energy to the surface, it wouldn't even begin to return to the original temperature the Sun gave it, and not even stop it from cooling until it reached the ambient temperature, no different than an Obama blanket placed on a warm corpse If the corpse is the whole Earth after the Sun went dead, it would eventually cool to the near-zero temperature of space even if Earth's atmosphere were 100% CO2. The IPCC wants you to believe that heat grows on trees, and if the evil capitalist pigs who own Big Oil keep emitting CO2, the Earth is headed for runaway global warming, even pretending to scientifically calculate a nonphysical "equilibrium climate sensitivity" (ECS) of so many degrees C global temperature rise per doubling of CO2 concentration, always with no calibration for zero CO2 concentration because it's not physical, only political, kaching! It's all lies tha are trying to deny Nature's ironclad Second Law of you know what for political gain. ECS is ZERO for all CO2 concentrations.
7. All other seemingly learned complications introduced by both sides are moose hockey that can't get around this fundamental problem that the CO2 dog won't hunt. Imagine the hordes of useful idiots they've manufactured to go for the brass ring.

Instead of publishing rehashes of this old school nonsense that overcomplicates the simple, WUWT should be publishing and constantly promoting my killer disproof of the IPCC's greenhouse gas warming theories until the public laughs it out of existence. The truth that will set people free is that the emperor has no clothes, it's not complicated, it's so simple that even a 5th grader can grasp it.

How many hundred million pageviews does WUWT have? Sometimes I suspect it's a false flag op owned by the IPCC. It's sure been doing them yeoman service by pretending to be independent critics who never go in for the kill but seem to be staging an endless diversion play of trying to calculate the number of angels that fit on the head of a pin to keep the big bucks the IPCC demands rolling in.

Here's my killer disproof, that is begging for a fatcat who can get it into the hands of every educated person (h.s. grad?) in the Western world:

Why Are Greenhouse Gas Theories Dead Wrong?, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™

Why would anybody want to finance that? To save the world from a preventable disaster. How many times do I have to publicize this demand of the IPCC for not trillions but hundreds of trillions of dollars to save us from their own hoax? Every one of those dollars would be a boondoggle. These are desperate times and require desperate measures.

Consulting firm McKinsey estimates $9 trillion per year cost for climate accords | budbromley

I hereby grant permission to reprint my killer bullet article in full with copyright notice intact. Since it's an html document filled with hyperlinks and images it can just be linked to with appropriate fanfare and get good results, or rehosted on a server capable of handling higher traffic.