The Historyscoper's Climate Watch: Undeniable Truths

Monday, August 10, 2020

Undeniable Truths

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/08/09/undeniable-truths/

My reply:

Back in 1956 Gilbert N. Plass discovered that atmospheric CO2's 15 micron radiation absorption wavelength exists in a hole in the H20 absorption wavelength, causing him to go off on a tangent and conclude that the average surface temperature of the earth increases 3.6° C if the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is doubled, coining the term "climate change".

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1956.tb01206.x

The term "global warming" was coined in 1975 by Wally Broecker.

https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu//files/2009/10/broeckerglobalwarming75.pdf

After the global environmental leftists at the U.N. took over the field, they founded the Intergovernmental Panel on CLIMATE CHANGE in 1988 in league with their fifth column in the U.S. headed by Al Gore. Realizing by then that "trapping" IR in the sky doesn't do anything for the temperature back at the surface, they began pushing the CO2 back radiation hoax, that CO2 doesn't trap IR but reemits it back to the surface where it heats things up.

This is where the greatest hoax in modern science got started. It's still going strong despite being totally based on fake physics because 15 microns has a Planck temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice, which isn't even heat. Hence CO2 can't absorb or emit heat. Only the Sun heats the Earth's surface. All the real heat caused by solar radiation (-50C to +50C) is cooled by natural processes of convection-evaporation and radiation. The U.N. IPCC picked the wrong getaway driver. This hoax's days are numbered, despite their machine's colossal political momentum wielding it as their ultimate leftist tool to end capitalism.

http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html

An associated hoax is the claim that without atmospheric CO2 supplying 33C of temperature the Sun alone couldn't keep the Earth from freezing. This can't be true since CO2 can't melt an ice cube, and indeed the real reason there is a 33C increase in surface temperature over an atmosphere-less Moon was derived long ago by Maxwell and Feynman, not by using radiation physics, but by using statistical mechanics, and is solely a consequence of gravity, atmospheric mass, pressure, density, and heat capacities, and not dependent on "trapped IR radiation" in atmospheric CO2. Each day the excess surface heat is either radiated or convects toward space, in the latter case pulling cooler air down to take its place until it dissipates by converting to work to expand against decreasing pressure. The permanent lapse rate just moves extra solar heat along a conveyor belt to space.

https://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2015/07/physicist-richard-feynman-proved.html

The CO2 climate issue is really that simple. Weather is what's so complex nobody can predict it.

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago