The global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC/WEF octopus of anti-Big Oil leftists is trying to eat the world by weaponizing the fake greenhouse effect. Global warming is good not bad, and more not less CO2 and H20 need to be pumped into the atmosphere to create more living space and food supplies.
For the top-level list of articles go to the Home Page
My favorite climate change skepticism Web site is Principia Scientifica, er, Principia Scientific, an old-time eclectic science site with a free forum welcome to all the scientists shut out by the closed-minded bigoted academic establishment. Unlike the academic journals, it has a free comments section where anybody can take on anybody, how refreshing. No matter how much the pro-AGW sites slam it as not being “peer-reviewed”, its free forum shows its honest intentions, and no need to mention, the pro-AGW agitprop artists are scarce to almost non-existent there. It’s like a return to the heady days of Galileo and the Roman Catholic Church, doing the only real work in climate science today. I never miss an issue.
Science's Untold Scandal: Professional Societies' Sell Out on Climate Change | PSI Intl (https://principia-scientific.org/sciences-untold-scandal-professional-societies-sell-out-on-climate-change/)
Vilifying People Who Question Global Warming Is Anti-Science | PSI Intl (https://principia-scientific.org/vilifying-people-who-question-global-warming-is-anti-science/)
The climate skeptic site Popular Technology.net has a great series of articles exposing the main pro-AGW “climate skeptic debunking” sites for their tawdry agitprop. Even if you think you’re pro-AGW, check this out before reading a “debunking” site so you won’t be fooled.
Popular Technology.net (http://www.populartechnology.net/)
There’s so many climate change skepticism sites that I compiled a list, along with a list of pro-AGW sites, so you can explore them and decide what you like. It’s free, so why not devote some time to checking them out? Of course all the pro-AGW sites are run by closed-minded bigots who don’t want you to know about this list or check any climate skeptic sites out, so why let them tell you what to think, you’re still free?
TLW's Climate Blog List (http://www.historyscoper.com/climateblogs.html)
It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.
Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).
Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.
The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.
So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.
This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.
So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.
It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad
It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.
The big story of 2024 that NOBODY is talking abou
-
I do find all this ironic. Folks motivated by greed and power are out
there building the so called new wortld believing their interests will be
preserv...
Nature 2023: Part II
-
This is a follow-on post to the previous summary of interesting work
related to the temperatures in 2023/2024. I’ll have another post with a
quick summar...
Wind and Solar Can’t Support the Grid
-
by Planning Engineer (Russ Schussler) In October of 2025, the isolated
small city of Broken Hill in New South Wales, Australia with a 36 MW load
(includ...
-
* Shocking Rise in Whale, Dolphin and Porpoise Strandings as Wind Farms
Proliferate Around British Coast*
Over the last decade as offshore wind farms prol...
Response to Don Cheadle
-
(This post was written to respond to Don's Twitter question here)
Don, off the top of my head, here are some things I believe:
1. CO2 is a greenhouse gas
2...
Willis Eschenbach radiates more nonsense at WUWT
-
I sometimes wonder at the shameless way deniers boast about their
ignorance, particularly their lack of understanding of basic science.
Willis Eschenbach i...
Capitalism is Oppressive, Give Us Free Socialism
-
Photo: Coada adevarului.ro.com (standing in the line of truth) “There is no
such thing as a free lunch, someone has to pay for it.” The American
socialist ...
Adjust contrast of a pdf free
-
Closer to the eye of the shooter, this is because Preview is quite
literally applying a filter to each individual page of the PDF you are
saving. the proce...
No, There Is No Magma Ocean
-
This is part of a series of articles responding to the claims made in Dean
Sessions’ Universal Model. Click the link to see the introduction to the
series...
Climate Change Impacts
-
As environmental change influences transportation, it will be paramount to
see how transportation base may be affected over the short- and long haul.
Thi...
Cow Farts causing Global Warming!?
-
Scientists and farmers around the world are debating a very serious subject
at the moment. You may not know it, but cows are actually one of the rudest
an...
Green Printing - Recyled Paper vs. E-Paper
-
One kind of industry rarely discussed among environmental movements is the
paper business.
It seems like such an obvious industry – paper is made from tre...
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment