Thursday, June 27, 2019

Why don't global warming skeptics who claim it's due to natural causes prove it?

https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-global-warming-skeptics-who-claim-its-due-to-natural-causes-prove-it

My reply:

https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-global-warming-skeptics-who-claim-its-due-to-natural-causes-prove-it/answer/TL-Winslow

The proof is out there that CO2 is physically unable to send heat from the atmosphere back to the surface, but the global monolith centered in in the U.N. IPCC does everything it can to suppress it while smothering people with their hoax literature because it goes along with an outrageous ransom attempt to bilk trillions in their bid to foist a Marxist world government.
Take water. When the Sun heats the Earth’s surface, it evaporates some water, which removes the heat and sends it up into the atmosphere as steam. But it’s cold up there, and while clouds block sunlight and absorb some more heat directly, eventually it lets go of the moisture in the form of rain, snow, and hail, cooling the surface a second time. Yet the IPCC hoaxers call water a greenhouse gas.
CO2, on the other hand, is just a trace element in the atmosphere which works together to remove solar heat from the surface mainly via conduction and float it slowly to space via convection. This heat never returns to the surface to warm it a second time, any more than smoke and heat from a chimney can return and cook the meal twice. The Earth’s gravity field insures that heat rises until it is lost via the lapse rate, and the concentration of CO2 is irrelevant because lapse rate depends only on g (gravity) and h (heat capacity of the atmosphere), radiation not being involved. The basic process is heat being traded for work to expand against the decreasing pressure. Once lost, there’s nothing to send back down to the surface.
Lapse rate - Wikipedia
Convection - Wikipedia
The hoax is to invent an imaginary IR radiation scheme that turns CO2 into a dragon in the sky that reheats the surface like a heat lamp. Sorry, this is a hoax. Due to the lapse rate, all air in the sky is cold, and CO2 doesn’t change that, and a colder object cannot heat a warmer object because of the iron laws of thermodynamics. Instead, a gravy train is set up in the sky propagating the heat upward until it’s diffused harmless in space. Even if there were 10x as much CO2 as now, the surface would never get warmer, sorry.
Since they can’t debate on the basic physics issue, the IPCC octopus has been concentrating on generating mountains of fake temperature data supposedly revealing a tiny but ever-rising increase in average global temperatures, which is based on a plethora of lies, although even they only claim 0.8C total warming since 1880. Their biggest swindle is to pretend to predict out to the year 2100 and claim a coming Armageddon that only they can prevent after capitalism is shut down and they’re put in control, bwahahaha. Stalin used to talk about useful idiots. What about you?
Try running the above simple truth by an IPCC puppet and watch their arrogant stares and their attempt to villify you as some kind of kook that should be marginalized and even locked up in a reeducation camp. They have closed minds, and just can’t handle the truth, because Marxism wants to rule the world and the decision has long been made to frame CO2 as evil and use it as the excuse for takeover. After all, the capitalism that’s created our modern happy wealthy convenient world runs on fossil fuels, and to shut it down they have to shut the fossil fuel industry down by painting even the most harmless CO2 emissions as evil. In truth CO2 is pure good, a clear clean odorless gas that’s the basis of all plant and hence animal life. Plants turn CO2 into oxygen. The more CO2 that gets in the atmosphere, the more vegetation thrives, allowing the billions to be fed, and more oxygen to be generated, increasing the ability to absorb more and more CO2. Don’t let the hoaxers trap your mind in a glass cage. It’s not even close. CO2 greenhouse warming is a hoax.

DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
Debunked: CO2 Will Not Cause A Food Shortage
Science's Untold Scandal: Professional Societies' Sell Out on Climate Change | PSI Intl
Vilifying People Who Question Global Warming Is Anti-Science | PSI Intl
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THSQqsYvL9o

Tell your climate scientist professor to read my devastating essay that disproves the CO2 greenhouse warming theory with physics and see what happens. It’s as hopeless as getting a flat earther to admit that the Earth is a globe. So quit asking us so-called global warming skeptics to prove it, instead read our disproofs and free your mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRXzfJVcV6s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tODIRhhV80

TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change

No comments:

Post a Comment

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago

Aug. 31, 2011. Giant pipe and balloon to pump water into the sky in climate experiment

May 31, 2013. Scientists find that higher CO2 levels green arid regions

Mar. 30, 2015. Higher atmospheric CO2 levels causing boom in vegetation

Aug. 2015. 'Unprecedented' volcanic eruption released enough water vapor to heat Earth: report

Aug. 15, 2017. Scientists find 91 new volcanoes miles beneath Antarctica's thick ice sheet

How Much CO2 Do Volcanoes Emit?

Will a major volcanic eruption fix climate change? - James Matkin

Part of the heat is coming from beneath our feet

Did any volcanoes erupt in 2020?

T.L. Winslow (TLW, the Historyscoper (tm)

My Blog List

Total Pageviews