The Historyscoper's Climate Watch: Why do climate change denialists think a massive change in the composition of gases in the atmosphere (CO2 up from 280ppm to 410) does not lead to a massive change in the climate?

Wednesday, June 19, 2019

Why do climate change denialists think a massive change in the composition of gases in the atmosphere (CO2 up from 280ppm to 410) does not lead to a massive change in the climate?

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-climate-change-denialists-think-a-massive-change-in-the-composition-of-gases-in-the-atmosphere-CO2-up-from-280ppm-to-410-does-not-lead-to-a-massive-change-in-the-climate

My reply:

An increase from 280 ppm to 410 ppm is not a “massive change of composition of gases in the atmosphere”, it’s almost imperceptible without sensitive instruments in isolated locations. 400 ppm is 0.04%, or 4 parts per ten thousand. Imagine a soccer match with ten thousand in the stands, and try to find four people in that mess. In short, CO2 is a trace element of the atmosphere, and maybe you smell a rat that you’ve been lied to.

Despite what so-called climate scientists that have been compromised by the insidious globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC claim, atmospheric CO2 has no effect on the climate, because the Sun drives the climate, and the entire atmosphere just follows along, removing the solar heat from Earth’s surface and venting it to space daily, but at a certain rate that moderates the temperature swings. This is a cooling not a heating process, sorry. Once heat is removed from the surface, it never returns. It might be interesting to certain specialists with no lives to follow the journey of the heat into space, but once it’s left the surface it can’t heat us in any way, it’s gone on a 1-way journey, just like a rock you roll down a mountain while you stand on the top.

This hasn’t stopped Marxists with designs on a world govt. from blowing the issue out of proportion with lewd-sounding claims that the evil capitalist system is pumping billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere and causing the Earth to heat up to the point of Armageddon, hence must be shut down to save us. Sorry, even if CO2 were 10% of the atmosphere, that is, half the oxygen content, we might choke but won’t overheat. Moose hockey about acidity of the oceans is just special pleading after the main argument is seen through. The only threat to humanity here is what the Marxists want to do to the world in their mad attempt to destroy capitalism, no matter whom it hurts.

Back To The Dark Ages: German Greens Look To Ban All Industrial Farming - The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) (https://www.thegwpf.com/back-to-the-dark-ages-german-greens-look-to-ban-all-industrial-farming/)

What This Vatican Climate Change Speaker Is Calling For Is Very Scary (https://www.teaparty.org/what-this-vatican-climate-change-speaker-is-calling-for-is-very-scary-366411/)

Destroy Capitalism to Save the Climate, Argues New York Times Op-Ed (https://reason.com/2017/11/21/destroy-capitalism-to-save-the-climate-a/)

Economists Have Been 'Useful Idiots' for the Green Socialists | Robert P. Murphy (http://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=12814)

UN Chief Poses For Time Cover Off 'Sinking' Pacific Island That's Actually Growing | PSI Intl (https://principia-scientific.org/un-chief-poses-for-time-cover-off-sinking-pacific-island-thats-actually-growing/)

UN has NO PROOF of Carbon Dioxide Warming | PSI Intl (https://principia-scientific.org/un-has-no-proof-of-carbon-dioxide-warming/)

Some reasons to be skeptical about climate alarm (https://www.cfact.org/2019/06/10/some-reasons-to-be-skeptical-about-climate-alarm/)

3 More New Papers Expose The Folly Of ‘Ocean Acidification’ Claims (https://notrickszone.com/2018/05/24/3-more-new-papers-expose-the-folly-of-ocean-acidification-claims/)

I’ve been proving that the CO2 greenhouse warming theory is based on fake physics with an ulterior purpose for anybody who will take a dare. How about you?

TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change (http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html)

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago