The Historyscoper's Climate Watch: Do you think that the climate change emergency is fake/a hoax?

Thursday, May 2, 2019

Do you think that the climate change emergency is fake/a hoax?

https://www.quora.com/Do-you-think-that-the-climate-change-emergency-is-fake-a-hoax/answer/TL-Winslow

My reply:

Definitely a hoax. First, CO2 is being framed as a magic climate control knob when it actually has no control over climate, but is just a miniscule fraction of the atmosphere, whose job is to cool the Earth’s surface daily after the Sun warms it by taking the heat up to outer space where it is dissipated harmlessly. The hoax is to claim that the widely-dispersed CO2 molecules (4 in 10,000) can reverse thermodynamic laws and send the heat back down to the surface like a second Sun, which would be like a perpetual motion machine and is therefore pure physics moose hockey designed to fool physics ignoramuses. Second, while only claiming 0.8C of total warming since 1880, the insidious globalist Marxists centered in the U.N. IPCC want you to believe that the Earth is in an emergency situation and they need trillions from rich countries now to save us, else the global climate will run away toward Armageddon. This is pure bunk.

World of Change: Global Temperatures
The Causes of Climate Change
The Mechanics of Climate Alarm

The real goal is to take wealth from the rich and funnel it to the poor mainly black countries as a kind of Marxist affirmative action. With Marxists every issue boils down to a racial one somehow. They not only don’t care if they kill the goose that lays the golden eggs, they want to destroy “white man’s capitalism” completely starting with the great beneficial fossil fuel industry and build a totalitarian racially-mixed Marxist paradise on the ruins. Ironically, if a new ice age begins their world sans fossil fuels that depends on sun and wind power will starve and freeze. Oh yes, drastic reduction of the world population is one of their biggest goals, I hope not.

Their biggest pigeon is the world’s richest and most successful capitalist country, the U.S., which they can’t stand is still mostly white. Too bad for them, people don’t buy it, led by Pres. Trump. If the hoaxers really cared about a solution that preserves capitalism they’d back nuclear energy and want to funnel billions or trillions to provide unlimited power to everybody on Earth of all races, including whites, but they can’t stand that. What cynical hypocrites who believe that the end justifies the means. Too bad for them, their sick attempts at hijacking science for social engineering are doomed to failure, and the truth will win.

Report: U.S. Owes the World $1 Trillion for Carbon Emissions
UN calls for international tax to raise $400 billion to finance development needs
The New, Safer Nuclear Reactors That Might Help Stop Climate Change
Ned Ryun: Green New Deal Is "Coercive Socialism," In Other Words, Communism
New World Order: Globalists Want To Annihilate 90% Of The Human Race
Fake Climate Science And Scientists
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaL9r-Kn5bc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vx-t9k7epIk

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago