The Historyscoper's Climate Watch: What caused the medieval warming period and the mini ice age in Europe long before mankind had the ability to emit carbon dioxide in large volume?

Thursday, April 18, 2019

What caused the medieval warming period and the mini ice age in Europe long before mankind had the ability to emit carbon dioxide in large volume?

https://www.quora.com/What-caused-the-medieval-warming-period-and-the-mini-ice-age-in-Europe-long-before-mankind-had-the-ability-to-emit-carbon-dioxide-in-large-volume

My reply:

Volcanoes can emit large quantities of carbon dioxide, but thinking that CO2 has anything to do with Earth’s surface temperature is a dead end. The Earth’s atmosphere is not a greenhouse but a gigantic chimney, continually removing solar heat from the surface and dumping it into outer space. The fact that the atmosphere has mass means it takes time to heat, hence it can only remove the surface heat at a certain rate, turning it into a gigantic leaky blanket that keeps the surface temperature within livable limits. The chemical composition of the atmosphere is irrelevant, CO2 included. The sick lying Trenberth diagram that shows T^4 arrows pointing up and downwith wattage labels is pure moose hockey, because the atmosphere smothers radiation and substitutes convection, so the only real arrows are going up. The Trenberth diagram almost looks like it’s for the Moon, with no atmosphere and all heat transferred via radiation, yet they claim that CO2 creates a dragon in the sky that radiates heat back to the surface, warming the climate relentlessly, not mentioning that there are only 4 CO2 molecules for every 10,000 oxygen-nitrogen molecules, causing any absorbed radiation to be quickly transferred via kinetic collisions and join the march to space.

Radiation Budget Diagram for Earth's Atmosphere

Sorry, but despite the gigantic globalist Marxist climate alarmist machine there is no dragon in the sky, and the CO2 concentration can increase to several times what it is now and the climate will be the same, but vegetation will thrive and green the planet to feed the teeming billions, which clearly the Marxists don’t want. Real changes in climate are caused by factors beyond human control, namely changes in solar radiation received in the upper atmosphere, and the fraction that makes it through to the surface to pump-prime the whole climate system. There are natural cycles that cause ice ages and warming periods. Does that answer your question?

Why greenhouse Gas Warming is Physically Impossible | PSI Intl
Earth cannot heat itself by it's own radiation | PSI Intl
Heat Flow Science Discredits Greenhouse Gas Theory | PSI Intl
Recycling of Heat in the Atmosphere is Impossible: A Note from Nasif S. Nahle
Flat Earth in Modern Physics
Top Aussie Scientist Reveals UN IPCC Greenhouse Gas 'Errors' | PSI Intl
Astrophysicist Debunks Mainstream Global Warming Alarm | PSI Intl
http://ttp://nov79.com/gbwm/bacr.html

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago