The global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC/WEF octopus of anti-Big Oil leftists is trying to eat the world by weaponizing the fake greenhouse effect. Global warming is good not bad, and more not less CO2 and H20 need to be pumped into the atmosphere to create more living space and food supplies.
For the top-level list of articles go to the Home Page
You can't win by fighting only the puppets and ignoring the puppet masters.
Where's your mention of the name that can't be named: GEORGE SOROS? Too bad, if he died tomorrow his leftist octopus would continue doing his bidding.
The vast left-wing conspiracy to trick and scare the West into dismantling its fossil fuel industry along with capitalism and economic growth to soften it up for a global Marxist police state they call the Great Reset has one Achilles heel: CO2-driven global warming, which for over 30 years has been relentlessly pushed by the global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC octopus of kept anti-fossil fuel activists masquerading as scientists, academics, journalists, and politicians.
Here's my free online historyscope of global Marxism and how it's now grabbing for the brass ring by using CO2-driven global warming as the crisis:
Why is CO2-driven global warming their Achilles heel? It's not some kind of disputable scientific theory, it's an outright fake physics hoax that has fooled vast multitudes of science ignoramuses, and even professional physicists.
The IPCC physicists don't admit or acknowledge that only the surfaces of the Sun and Earth are black body radiators, which absorb and emit radiation (photons) at all wavelengths, while the Earth's atmosphere can never be, only absorbing and emitting photons in narrow bands.
All along CO2's weak low energy narrow-band 15 micron thermal radiation can't melt an ice cube because it's the same as thermal radiation emitted by an iron rod chilled to -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C)..
The hoax is based on the -80C trick, plus a sleasy carnival trick of double counting of energy, pretending that CO2's "back radiation" raises Earth surface temperature with its energy, when the surface has to radiate along a complete 0-50 micron curve first, losing all that energy to space at light speed and cooling before atmospheric CO2 molecules can intercept a small amount with low energy and return it, by which time the surface has cooled permanently until the next sunrise. This cooling happens slowly, but is unreversible. By double-counting energy, the U.N. IPCC octopus makes CO2 seem like a second Sun that's threatening global climate Armageddon, allowing them to demand all the money and power that exists to save us from their own fake physics hoax.
Read my detailed explosion of the IPCC CO2-driven global warming hoax and fight back before it's too late.
It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.
Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).
Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.
The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.
So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.
This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.
So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.
It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad
It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.
Al Gore: Climate Barking at COP29
-
To the Church of Climate, Al Gore will always be their champion. But back
in reality, citizen voters as consumers and taxpayers have had enough.
Skeptical Science New Research for Week #47 2024
-
Open access notables
*Projected increase in the frequency of extremely active Atlantic hurricane
seasons, *Lopez et al., *Science Advances:*
*Future chan...
Operationalizing Climate Science
-
There is a need to make climate science more agile and more responsive, and
that means moving (some of it) from research to operations.
The post Operatio...
The climate case of the century
-
by Lucas Bergkamp On the 12th of November, the Hague Court of Appeal ruled
in the “climate case of the century” that Milieudefensie (“FoE”) filed
against S...
-
* Shocking Rise in Whale, Dolphin and Porpoise Strandings as Wind Farms
Proliferate Around British Coast*
Over the last decade as offshore wind farms prol...
How Was Sustainable Development Introduced
-
The lynchpin of U.N. Agenda 2030, originally U.N. Agenda 21, is Sustainable
Development (SD) with its 17 SD goals established by the United Nations’
global...
Fraud Detection and the Presidential Election
-
Since the recent presidential election, I have seen a number of claims
about supposed election fraud. The Trump campaign and allies have filed a
number of ...
Adjust contrast of a pdf free
-
Closer to the eye of the shooter, this is because Preview is quite
literally applying a filter to each individual page of the PDF you are
saving. the proce...
Climate Change Impacts
-
As environmental change influences transportation, it will be paramount to
see how transportation base may be affected over the short- and long haul.
Thi...
Cow Farts causing Global Warming!?
-
Scientists and farmers around the world are debating a very serious subject
at the moment. You may not know it, but cows are actually one of the rudest
an...
Green Printing - Recyled Paper vs. E-Paper
-
One kind of industry rarely discussed among environmental movements is the
paper business.
It seems like such an obvious industry – paper is made from tre...
No comments:
Post a Comment