The global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC/WEF octopus of anti-Big Oil leftists is trying to eat the world by weaponizing the fake greenhouse effect. Global warming is good not bad, and more not less CO2 and H20 need to be pumped into the atmosphere to create more living space and food supplies.
For the top-level list of articles go to the Home Page
What a waste this article is. Why stay stuck on stupid with lame obsolete experiments from the horse and buggy era?
Why no comment that CO2's specific heat is lower than air's, hence it takes less Joules of energy to raise its temperature by 1 degree C, thus it will heat faster if large amounts of heat are applied. This experiment is moose hockey because it doesn't limit the IR input to the specific wavelength that CO2 absorbs from Earth's surface, namely 15 microns. If it did, actually nothing would heat because its Planck radiation temperature is -80C, lower than dry ice. The picture shows the use of an infrared lamp, which radiates in the range .78 microns to 1000 microns and often has an effective radiating temperature of 1000C or 1800C, yet no specifics are given.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_heater
IR heaters can heat not only the gases but the bottles, both by direct radiation and warmed air. The gases will then warm by conduction and convection. Good luck finding a bottle material that doesn't absorb the radiation but passes all of it to the gas. Either way, the heater should be kept a long distance away from the bottles to eliminate cross-convection.
But why bother? The CO2-driven global warming theory is dead. The Planck Radiation Law of 1900 killed it. I have shown how radiative physics really works here on P-S, complete with the killer bullet of exposing CO2's weak puny -80C photons as unable to melt an ice cube, yet nobody seems to have caught on or fought to spread it. Meanwhile the IPCC juggernaut is closing its grip. I can only hope P-S gets newer smarter readers.
Just Say No to the IPCC and -80C.
This is my best deepest disproof of the CO2 global warming hoax, patiently explaining each step and answering all known objections. If millions of people read it, the IPCC would be dead. Don't be among the last when you can be among the first. Even if you can't handle all the physics, you can still take away the soundbyte that atmospheric CO2's -80C radiation can't melt an ice cube and can't cause global warming at any concentration.
It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.
Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).
Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.
The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.
So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.
This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.
So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.
It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad
It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.
The Twelve Days of Climate Christmas
-
On the third day of Christmas, my true love gave to me: Three canceled
pipelines, Two melting glaciers, And a carbon tax on my pear tree.
The big story of 2024 that NOBODY is talking abou
-
I do find all this ironic. Folks motivated by greed and power are out
there building the so called new wortld believing their interests will be
preserv...
Nature 2023: Part II
-
This is a follow-on post to the previous summary of interesting work
related to the temperatures in 2023/2024. I’ll have another post with a
quick summar...
Wind and Solar Can’t Support the Grid
-
by Planning Engineer (Russ Schussler) In October of 2025, the isolated
small city of Broken Hill in New South Wales, Australia with a 36 MW load
(includ...
-
* Shocking Rise in Whale, Dolphin and Porpoise Strandings as Wind Farms
Proliferate Around British Coast*
Over the last decade as offshore wind farms prol...
Response to Don Cheadle
-
(This post was written to respond to Don's Twitter question here)
Don, off the top of my head, here are some things I believe:
1. CO2 is a greenhouse gas
2...
Willis Eschenbach radiates more nonsense at WUWT
-
I sometimes wonder at the shameless way deniers boast about their
ignorance, particularly their lack of understanding of basic science.
Willis Eschenbach i...
Capitalism is Oppressive, Give Us Free Socialism
-
Photo: Coada adevarului.ro.com (standing in the line of truth) “There is no
such thing as a free lunch, someone has to pay for it.” The American
socialist ...
Adjust contrast of a pdf free
-
Closer to the eye of the shooter, this is because Preview is quite
literally applying a filter to each individual page of the PDF you are
saving. the proce...
No, There Is No Magma Ocean
-
This is part of a series of articles responding to the claims made in Dean
Sessions’ Universal Model. Click the link to see the introduction to the
series...
Climate Change Impacts
-
As environmental change influences transportation, it will be paramount to
see how transportation base may be affected over the short- and long haul.
Thi...
Cow Farts causing Global Warming!?
-
Scientists and farmers around the world are debating a very serious subject
at the moment. You may not know it, but cows are actually one of the rudest
an...
Green Printing - Recyled Paper vs. E-Paper
-
One kind of industry rarely discussed among environmental movements is the
paper business.
It seems like such an obvious industry – paper is made from tre...
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment