The Dishonesty of ‘Greenhouse Gases’

https://principia-scientific.com/the-dishonesty-of-greenhouse-gases/ 

My reply:

 [[An over-simplified calculation was concocted about 20 years ago, that misleads most scientists who might probe it into thinking that the average level of radiation that Earth’s outer atmospheric surface (the tropopause) receives from the Sun is 25% of the level that a satellite would measure when existing in space at the same distance from the Sun.]]

[[As shown below, that factor should be 40.6%, (being 4/p2) but non-scientific people have no chance of recognizing that error. In fact, most scientists cannot do so either because that would require them to have studied the Quantum Mechanical theory of light, and to have a good background in statistics as well.]]

[[So the perpetrators of the concocted calculation could have been reasonably sure that they would escape detection for many decades, when they first launched their concocted science with its calculated surface temperature of -18oC and a 33oC GHE Effect to arrive at Earth’s measured temperature of 15oC. And while those scientists may not have understood then that global warming has been arising from solar variations and orbital interactions, of which neither can possibly be ameliorated by mankind, they should have at least tried to understand the thermodynamics of greenhouse gases before they labelled them as the cause of global warming.]]

[[When that double-cosine point-intensity is averaged over the whole sunlit hemisphere, where both q and l  each range independently from –p/2 to +p/2 radians, an averaging factor of 2/p is obtained for each component.]]

You're getting close but no cigar, sorry.

To use the S-B T^4 law on the Earth, the U.N. IPCC fake scientists first turn it into a flat motionless disk with no oceans or atmosphere, so that the "average global temperature" can be calculated from pure instantaneous radiation absorption/emission independent of time. But as Galileo said, "E pur si muove" (Nevertheless it moves).  Making the Earth spin, with the Sun illuminating a hemisphere instead of a disk, and the oceans and atmosphere acting as heat storage makes this 5th grader model into junk that bears no resemblance to reality. Funny why they want to use a flat Earth with surface area of 1/4 the sphere, and reduce the Sun's power to 1/4 supposedly to compensate, when that also lowers the Sun's Planck radiation temperature and shifts the whole curve, creating a fake weak Sun that of course can't keep the Earth from freezing, with a net temperature of -18C. The IPCC hoaxers than want you to believe that the real figure of +15C proves that CO2 supplies the missing 33C, but without any physical explanation including why they waved away the rest of the atmosphere. Why don't they reduce the Sun's power by only 1/2 and have it illuminate a stationary hemisphere sans oceans and atmosphere? Because they worked backwards, the sure sign of junk science that's trying to find the truth no matter where it leads, not justify a preconceived conclusion for political purposes.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-natural-greenhouse-effect-and-the-anthropogenic-greenhouse-effect-What-is-the-difference-between-them/answer/TL-Winslow

How many times do I have to bring out the killer sword? The IPCC CO2 warming hoax relies on widespread ignorance of radiative physics based on Nature's ironclad Planck's Radiation Law, which
makes CO2's weak puny 15 micron photons with a Planck radiation temperature of -80C incapable of melting an ice cube, or raising the temperature of any molecule higher than -80C.

Planck's Law makes optical IR thermometers (OIRTs) possible that can measure a radiating body's temperature by just sampling it from a distance and focusing the signal with a lens on a thermopile. This only works because photons have a Planck radiation temperature based on their wavelength via Wien's Displacement Law, which is derived from Planck's Radiation Law. If this weren't true then the remote IR signal would keep building up the temperature and never stop, but instead if levels off at a value determined by Wien's/Planck's Law.

The complementary big lie by the IPCC is to show a graph of Earth surface IR vs. wavelength as seen from satellites displayed side by side with one of solar energy hitting the atmosphere, and point out notches at CO2's 15 micron radiation wavelength, claiming that this proves that CO2 "traps and piles heat" in the atmosphere and raises the surface temperature. Zonk! Distortions or not, the surface IR curve as seen from space has a clear peak corresponding to the surface temperature from Planck's Law, and notches only indicate blocking of some wavelengths of radiation on its way to space, which might affect the frigid sky temperatures, but the surface temperature is the surface temperature, and CO2 didn't change it. Instead, they push the sick hoax that CO2's x watts per square meter of IR from the sky raises the surface temperature so many degrees C, when it can't raise it even one millionth of a degree C, and their own satellite data proves it, else they'd prominently show the shift in those graphs.

https://www.quora.com/What-specific-chemical-properties-of-carbon-dioxide-causes-the-greenhouse-effect-Why-chemically-is-carbon-more-reflective-than-other-gases/answer/TL-Winslow

This is a classic case of lies flying around the world at jet speed while the truth limps behind. What will it take to wake the public up and laugh the IPCC away, along with its plans to bilk trillions in the name of saving the world from CO2 but actually planning on redistributing it for their idea of Marxist social-racist justice?

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-the-WEFs-Great-Reset-proposal-and-communism-or-socialism/answer/TL-Winslow