The Historyscoper's Climate Watch: QUORA.COM BEING TAKEN OVER BY LEFTIST IPCC AND GEORGE SOROS

Sunday, February 23, 2020

QUORA.COM BEING TAKEN OVER BY LEFTIST IPCC AND GEORGE SOROS - T.L. Winslow

QUORA.COM BEING TAKEN OVER BY LEFTIST IPCC AND GEORGE SOROS - T.L. Winslow
Feb. 23, 2020

Starting in late 2019, Quora.com began getting more and more open about censoring any climate change skeptic article somebody tries to publish there. At first they just routinely collapsed answers and made the victims appeal, in other words, begs. Usually they restored the answer, but after an elapsed time sufficient to reduce interest because it's not in the latest articles list.

QUORA PLAGUED BY IPCC TROLLS:

“Please read the above: As usual someone on Quora saw fit to report this as violation of policy. It was not and Quora restored it on appeal. This is a great example of the fundamental dishonesty of the Climate Change people. They demonstrate their fascism every day in acts like trying to report this post! They don’t want you to know the truth. I DO! I never hide what they have to say.. I WANT YOU TO KNOW WHAT THEY SAY AND DO!” - Paul Noel's answer to What changes in your life are you going to make to contribute to mitigating climate change?

2/21/20. NOTICE: QUORA MODERATORS ARE NOW ENEMIES OF FREE SPEECH

Quora Moderation reviewed and rejected your appeal regarding your answer to: Why are climate change skeptics routinely referred to as “science deniers”? This decision cannot be appealed. Learn more about Quora's policies here.

TL Winslow's answer to Why are climate change skeptics routinely referred to as “science deniers”?

This article was one of my most powerful ever, unanswerable, able to wake IPCC zombies up from their brainwashing. No wonder they shielded their buddies at the IPCC from embarrassment, not even offering specific reasons for censorship. Who knows how many viewers won’t get to read it.

2/23/20. QUORA MODERATORS QUIT HIDING BEHIND BOTS
I suspected them all along, programming bots that single-out their political enemies for special treatment, allowing them to blame the bots, but now they’re coming out openly, actively suppressing views that expose global Marxism in our midst, especially the massive push by the IPCC to use global warming as their tool to destroy our capitalist world and all its benefits, even when their site enjoys the benefits of it for its very existence. Due to efforts by evil billionaire George Soros and others, your right to freedom of speech is under threat They are no longer disguising their bias, so beware when trying to publish your own articles.

Quora Moderation (https://www.quora.com/profile/Quora-Moderation-1) reviewed and rejected your appeal regarding your answer to: Why are climate change skeptics routinely referred to as “science deniers”? This decision cannot be appealed. Learn more about Quora's policies here
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-main-policies-and-guidelines-for-answers-on-Quora

2/23/20. Now that they got away with the above, they collapsed one of my major articles that took months to perfect that’s full of links exposing the IPCC climate change hoax and had over 2,000 views and 32 upvotes, claiming it violated their rules on plagiarism, without any specifics or offer to edit it first.

They later added the lame non-excuse Answer needs attribution (https://www.quora.com/What-is-Quoras-policy-on-plagiarism-and-attribution)(Appealed). They could have claimed a bot did it by mistake then uncollapsed it. Instead, a moderator quickly denied my so-called appeal asking for specifics without reason, saying their decision can’t be appealed. Actually, they didn't deny my appeal, they denied my right to appeal. Like typical slimy leftists, they just don't delete the article with an honest explanation like "Not in accordance with Quora's leftist views".

This is PURE CENSORSHIP, and nobody can doubt their threat to all now. Leftism is a pure evil and threatens the world. Once they get brainwashed by choosing to read only leftist agitprop, the first thing they do is attempt to suppress free speech of anybody they disagree with, because they’re revolutionaries in a war to overturn the world order and replace it with their own, no doubt with mucho bloodshed when they get the chance.

Quora Moderation (https://www.quora.com/profile/Quora-Moderation-1) reviewed and rejected your appeal regarding your answer to: If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening? This decision cannot be appealed. Learn more about Quora's policies here https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-main-policies-and-guidelines-for-answers-on-Quora
.
https://www.quora.com/If-climate-change-is-a-hoax-why-do-so-many-scientists-say-its-happening/answer/TL-Winslow

START BACKING UP ALL YOUR QUORA ARTICLES AND PREPARING TO ABANDON IT FOR ANOTHER SITE. THEY’VE CROSSED A RED LINE. START EXPOSING THEM OUTSIDE QUORA TO WARN OTHERS.

I AM BOYCOTTING QUORA AND NOT PUBLISHING ANY NEW ARTICLES UNLESS/UNTIL THEY RESTORE ALL MY COLLAPSED ARTICLES, APOLOGIZE, AND PROMISE TO NEVER DO IT AGAIN. - 2/23/20

I had copyright all along, so they're published here on my site:

http://www.historyscoper.com/whyareclimatechangeskeptics.html

http://www.historyscoper.com/ifclimatechangeisahoax.html

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago