The Historyscoper's Climate Watch: What is the best way to present proof of global climate change to someone who denies its existence?

Thursday, May 2, 2019

What is the best way to present proof of global climate change to someone who denies its existence?

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-best-way-to-present-proof-of-global-climate-change-to-someone-who-denies-its-existence
My reply:

Who denies the existence of global climate change? It’s physically impossible for Earth’s climate to remain stationary because of the ever-changing galactic situation acting on the Sun. The real question is do humans have any effect on Earth’s climate, and how? Sure, if H-bombs are exploded all over the Earth, the dust kicked up will cause global cooling, but how can anything humans do heat the climate up? Even the heat from the H-bombs is soon dissipated into outer space.

Sorry, but humans can’t cause the Earth’s climate to permanently heat up. Meanwhile for decades the insidious evil global Marxists centered in the U.N. IPCC have hijacked scientific organizations to frame the trace amount of CO2 in the atmosphere as not only a magical climate control knob, but a second Sun in the sky.

Sorry, there is only one Sun, and if we could make its output increase we could use it as a real climate control knob, but we can’t. CO2 is just part of Earth’s atmosphere, which takes the Sun’s heat away from the Earth’s surface via conduction, radiation, and convection, and dissipates it in outer space. It has no special ability to send heat back to the surface, like the IPCC outfit lies. Their lab experiments showing a tube of CO2 warming up when infrared energy is shined into it give their lie away, because if it could send the energy back it would stay cool and the outside world heat up.

Since all CO2 does is absorb IR and heat up, that means it helps cool the surface, then becomes lighter like any gas and rises toward space, carrying the heat up and away until it releases it in the infinite heat sink of outer space. It’s the atmosphere as a whole not the miniscule CO2 fraction that acts as a blanket, interfering with radiation and substituting slower convection to reduce the extremes experienced on the Moon. The con game is exposed with the revelation that during the Ordovician Period the Earth suffered a million-year ice age while atmospheric levels were 11 times today’s CO2 levels.

Ordovician - Wikipedia

What a miserable con game the hoaxers are running, all because years ago they decided that framing CO2 as evil combined with the ever-increasing atmospheric concentration as measured in Hawaii would give them the weapon they need to destroy the fossil fuel industry, and capitalism along with it, all in the name of saving us from an imaginary dragon in the sky. CO2 is plant food, and the more the merrier. It’s not “carbon pollution”.

Does Overproduction of CO2 Harm the Environment?

The desperate zeal of the hoaxers to push their lies is not due to scientific zeal, because science is against them. It’s due to Marxist fanaticism, their sick unworkable dream of burning capitalism to the ground and erecting a Marxist utopia on the ashes. I and other smart people including Pres. Trump aren’t falling for it, and aren’t being driven like cows by the reams of climate alarmist agitprop, and I hope everybody wakes up and the issue is dropped in favor of a push for more nuclear energy as the only real viable long-term guarantee of comfort, health, and wealth for all sans Communism. The Commies can go back to street fighting to get what they want, who cares they’re exposed as pure evil after the horrors of Stalin, Mao, Castro, Maduro et al.

Climate alarmists aren’t trying to save the planet, they want communism in America
Global Warming Is A Communist Plot
To combat climate change, communism is our only hope - The Diamondback
Guardian: “Ending climate change requires the end of capitalism”
TLW's Communism Historyscope
TLW's Climate Alarmistscope™, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™

Don’t listen to me, I’m like John the Baptist, a voice crying in the wilderness, snubbed by the establishment but telling truth to power. For months I’ve been publishing an Internet article disproving the CO2 greenhouse warning theory with physics. Read it if you want your mind settled.

TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KazGXAqgkds

Here is a reading list of other voices speaking truth to power. Note how the hoaxers want to suppress them any way they can because they can’t answer them, and just want your money. Of course, they immediately go ad hominem and want them dismissed as authored by evil capitalist pigs, conservatives, etc. Too bad for them, the truth will win in the end.
Fake Climate Science And Scientists

TLW's Climate Blog List

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago