The Historyscoper's Climate Watch: Is carbon really causing the rise in earth's temperature?

Friday, May 3, 2019

Is carbon really causing the rise in earth's temperature?

https://www.quora.com/Is-carbon-really-causing-the-rise-in-earths-temperature/answer/TL-Winslow

My reply:

Ever found out that you’ve been lied to? And just to get into your wallet? Take the evil insidious globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC hydra that has hijacked the world’s scientific organizations and governments for instance. “Carbon pollution” really sounds bad, doesn’t it? Too bad, real carbon pollution would be SOOT in the atmosphere, which would COOL the Earth’s surface, not warm it. They’re not talking about carbon (C), or even poisonous carbon monoxide (CO), but carbon dioxide (CO2), a clear safe clean green life-sustaining food for plants, cynically attempting to frame it as evil because no matter how hard the fossil fuel industry tries to eliminate real pollutants, it will still emit CO2, and the total atmospheric concentration has been steadily rising from 300 ppm to 400 ppm, so putting two and two together and getting three they want to frame CO2 in order to shut the fossil fuel industry down completely. And substitute it with what, safe nuclear energy? No, unworkable unreliable unsustainable solar and wind power. Meanwhile there are signs of a coming ice age, meaning that a world dependent on wind and solar would starve and freeze.

https://papundits.wordpress.com/2019/04/26/carbon-is-not-a-synonym-for-carbon-dioxide/
'Carbon Dioxide is the Real Green Deal' Says Climate Expert
Batteries cannot make renewables reliable
The $2.5 Trillion Reason We Can’t Rely on Batteries to Clean up the Grid
New Satellite Data Confirm Real World Temperature Cooler Than Climate Models
Ned Ryun: Green New Deal Is "Coercive Socialism," In Other Words, Communism
Majority of Brits unwilling to cut back to fight climate change, poll finds
GWPF Slam Zero Carbon Proposals As Irresponsible & Arbitrary
Offshore Wind Costs–Facts v Propaganda
BILL GATES Slams Unreliable Wind & Solar: ‘Let’s Quit Jerking Around With Renewables & Batteries’
Gov. Inslee: 'We Have to Decarbonize Our Entire Economy in the Next Several Decades'
Hot and Indigestible Carbon Dioxide
Report: U.S. Owes the World $1 Trillion for Carbon Emissions
Rocketing Carbon Prices & A Stagnant Economy–Welcome To The EU Fantasy World
The Real Cost Of Decarbonisation Revealed By Sir David MacKay In 2011

Wake up and smell the odorless carbon dioxide. CO2 has no power to send heat removed from the surface by convection and radiation back to the surface. It’s just part of the atmosphere that removes surface heat deposited by the Sun and vents it harmlessly to space. 14.7 pounds per square inch means something real. If a balloon filled with CO2 were to somehow absorb so much surface radiation that it grew red-hot, that would only cause it to become lighter and rise to space faster, taking all that heat with it. Never can it land back on earth without shedding its heat first, and that heat would be absorbed by the surrounding oxygen and nitrogen molecules and continue its rise to space. Even an H-bomb exploded on the Earth’s surface does its hot work fast, and the heat is soon vented up into space like everything else.

So Earth’s atmosphere is a giant chimney, not a greenhouse. The fact that convection interferes with and absorbs radiation, and is slower than radiation is what makes the atmosphere a blanket, not the miniscule CO2 fraction in it. With no atmosphere, heat could only be removed by pure radiation like on the Moon, which suffers temperature extremes unlike the Earth, whose atmosphere moderates the swings and makes the surface livable. Don’t fix something that ain’t broke. Leave the climate alone and rejoice if it gets warmer and life becomes more comfortable. Worry only about a coming ice age, when we will need all the fossil fuels we can get.

I’m dumber than a what? Sorry, I’m a physics freak from way back when most of you were probably not born yet. How about you? Do you know as much physics as a 5th grader? I can explain to you why the CO2 greenhouse warming theory is a hoax based on junk physics that relies on the public being full of physics ignoramuses while the scientists rake in the big bucks for their organizations and the U.N. for ulterior purposes that have nothing to do with science but globalist Marxism.

Only socialism can solve global warming crisis say Communists
https://climateofsophistry.com/2019/02/28/forget-global-warming-the-sun-says-an-ice-age-is-coming/
TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago