The Historyscoper's Climate Watch: How are animals affected by climate change?

Friday, May 3, 2019

How are animals affected by climate change?

https://www.quora.com/How-are-animals-affected-by-climate-change/answer/TL-Winslow

My reply:

Ever hear of the theory of Darwinian evolution? Animals adapt to climate change. The existence of polar bears, penguins, walruses, etc., shows how well this has worked, n’est ce pas? If climate changes again, ditto will happen. Too bad, the insidious globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC has long been pushing the CO2 greenhouse warming hoax, and hijacking scientific organizations to scare the world into coughing up billions and trillions to either atone for it or stop it.

Only socialism can solve global warming crisis say Communists

Good news: There’s nothing to stop. There is no global warming, despite a plethora of so-called scientific articles and paprs blaming climate change for all kinds of dire consequences to flora and fauna, even maple syrup. This is seen to be prostituted bunk when the actual claimed global warming is only 0.8C since 1880. No plant or animal could even sense such a small statistical computer-generated quantity much less need to adapt to it. The temperature rises and falls more than this daily in just minutes. Show me an animal with an Apple watch that records and compiles yearly average temperature then reads it out in animal language so they can suddenly freak and overreact :) The prostituted alarmist articles and papers all have another more likely explanation, e.g., famine/overpopulation, predators, human incursion/pollution.

World of Change: Global Temperatures

Here’s one recent example. The hoaxer community pushed a narrative about starving polar bears caused by guess what global warming, which turned out to be bunk.

If You Are An Alarmist, You Will Find This Report UNBEARABLE! | PSI Intl

Recently David Attenborough tried to claim that some walruses jumped off a cliff because of their frustration with climate change, when actually they were scared by some polar bears.

Why Attenborough’s Walrus Claims Are Fake.

Another hoax was that global warming was causing coral bleaching and threatening the existence of the Great Barrier Reef. Actually, bleaching happens in a natural cycle and coral always recovers naturally.

After El Nino Bleaching, Coral Reefs Now Recovering | PSI Intl

Want more? For funners, here’s my growing list of climate alarmist agitprop articles, all promulgated with the open or concealed goal of supporting IPCC’s long-range plan of destroying capitalism and foisting world Marxism and its slavery on the entire human race. One day these articles will hopefully be treated as jokes.

TLW's Climate Alarmistscope™, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™

Sometimes I wish climate change were real and is being caused by our basic primal life gas CO2. Too bad, climate is caused by the Sun and the galactic forces acting upon it, and CO2 has nothing to do with it. Physics makes it impossible for atmospheric CO2 to send heat back to the surface and become a second Sun. That’s a hoax perpetrated by the IPCC hydra for power and greed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KazGXAqgkds

See my proof at: TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago