https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2022/05/09/saturation-of-ir-wavelengths/
Reply:
The jig is up on the U.N. IPCC’s greenhouse gas warming hoax.
It’s not that IR wavelengths are saturated, it’s that atmospheric gas molecules aren’t Planck black body radiators, hence they can’t stop Earth’s surface from cooling via radiation, period.
http://www.historyscoper.com/whyaregreenhousegastheoriesdeadwrong.html
What are you doing to spread the news and get the IPCC laughed out of existence?
Reply 2:
Why does no one read my killer disproof of the IPCC greenhouse gas warming hoax and learn how sweet pure thermal physics really works with Earth's climate?
[[My suggested method is “count the photons” as a way to question the suggested Enhanced Greenhouse Effect (EGHE). This assumes all photons carry the same energy, which is approximately true within a band known as “IR”.]]
Zonk! Each photon carries an energy inversely proportional to wavelength. The surfaces of the Sun and Earth are Planck black body radiators, which attempt to radiate all their photons at a wavelength inversely proportional to temperature with quantum precision. The power-wavelength curve isn't a single sharp line only because of the Second Law of Thermodynamics AKA ENTROPy. All the photons off the Wien Displacement Law wavelength are WASTE HEAT. Planck black body radiation is Nature's way of transmitting HEAT across space. Heat is measured by temperature. The Wien wavelength is precisely determined by temperature. When one black body radiates onto another, the second absorbs its photons and raises its internal temperature based on its heat capacity, moving from one black body radiation curve to another until the temperatures and radiation curves equalize. A colder black body cannot raise the temperature of a hotter black body AT ALL. The source photons are just dissipated by entropy into the Heat Death of the Universe.
All attempts to create a greenhouse gas effect by counting photons and balancing energies are MOOSE HOCKEY, because they totally ignore Nature's ironclad Second Law of Thermodynamics, and the fundamental process of entropy dispersal.
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(energy_dispersal)
From day one atmospheric physicists starting with Fourier thought that atmospheric gases were black body radiators, and didn't even know about quanta, making all their greenhouse gas warming theories into garbage. It took until 1900 for Planck to announce the quantum and the Planck Black Body Radiation Law, after which it took longer to realize that atmospheric gases weren't black body radiators, but only captured and reemitted photons at certain narrow wavelength ranges. This makes all attempts at justifying greenhouse gas warming theories futile, because the only black bodies involved, the surfaces of the Sun and Earth, heat and cool nicely on their own, with atmospheric gases unable to stop it. Even worse, the only wavelengths that CO2, H2O, and CH4 are active at are outside the normal Earth surface temperature range of -50C to +50C, meaning that all the massive torrents of surface radiation photons just pass those molecules by, allowing them to reach the top of atmosphere untouched, as seen in NASA Goddard's own satellite data. Once the real heat photons have left the surface, it's COOLED. And that's FINAL. There's no need to "count photons" hoping to find a pony in the river of manure. There is no pony in the manure. CO2 doesn't have any power to reraise the surface temperature to the same level that the Sun did, much less add more heat and raise it. It's not even junk science. It's LIES.
Not just portions, but the entire U.N. IPCC greenhouse gas warming hoax is a bloomin' onion of lies. There's no truth in it. They don't even treat the Earth as a spinning ball being basted by solar radiation, heating the Earth's surface and giving it time to cool each day. Their sick inversion of climate science has turned the Earth into a stationary flat disk that's irradiated by a yearly average of solar radiation, from which they pretend to calculate "global average temperature", (GAT) a totally nonphysical fairy land statistic that bears no resemblance to reality, then pretend to find tiny increases correlated with Mauna Loa CO2 readings.
The game isn't to recalculate GAT, but to throw it out, and just recognize that greenhouse gases can't do diddly to reverse the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Thus the entire IPCC edifice designed by leftist anti-fossil fuel activists can be dumped into the trash, and the whole organization laughed off. The next step is to get it disbanded and demand the money be refunded, plus damages asses for all the evil they've caused. Only then can real research in climate science be funded by govts., with all-new scientists who understand thermal physics, like moi.
Please take time to read my killer disproof articles cited in the first reply to this article, and be prepared to learn true thermal physics, not the hijacked upside-down version of the IPCC.
It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.
Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).
Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.
The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.
So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.
This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.
So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.
It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad
It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.
Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago
Aug. 31, 2011. Giant pipe and balloon to pump water into the sky in climate experiment
May 31, 2013. Scientists find that higher CO2 levels green arid regions
Mar. 30, 2015. Higher atmospheric CO2 levels causing boom in vegetation
Aug. 2015. 'Unprecedented' volcanic eruption released enough water vapor to heat Earth: report
Aug. 15, 2017. Scientists find 91 new volcanoes miles beneath Antarctica's thick ice sheet
How Much CO2 Do Volcanoes Emit?
Will a major volcanic eruption fix climate change? - James Matkin
Part of the heat is coming from beneath our feet
Did any volcanoes erupt in 2020?
T.L. Winslow (TLW, the Historyscoper (tm)
.jpg)
TL Winslow