The Antarctic Volcanoes Project Blog: We have both climate change fear mongers as well as denialists. The truth lies somewhere in the middle. What is it?

Sunday, June 23, 2019

We have both climate change fear mongers as well as denialists. The truth lies somewhere in the middle. What is it?

https://www.quora.com/We-have-both-climate-change-fear-mongers-as-well-as-denialists-The-truth-lies-somewhere-in-the-middle-What-is-it?

My reply:
https://www.quora.com/We-have-both-climate-change-fear-mongers-as-well-as-denialists-The-truth-lies-somewhere-in-the-middle-What-is-it/answer/TL-Winslow

Sorry, but truth isn’t like a golf shot that missed the cup. It doesn’t necessarily lie somewhere in the “middle”, because there may be no middle. Sometimes one side is just plain wrong. Are you confusing reality with Hegelian-Marxist dialectic, a bunch of moose hockey?
Dialectic - Wikipedia
When it comes to the climate change issue, the truth is that CO2-driven “greenhouse warming” has always been a pure scientific hoax, because the science has been settled for 150 years that CO2 in the atmosphere may capture some heat from Earth’s surface that was originally deposited by the Sun, but it can’t send it back, only help the rest of the atmosphere take it to space. If you’re standing on top of a mountain and kick a stone, it will roll downhill and might cause an avalanche, but up where you’re at you’re safe. Why? The gradient of gravity.
The Earth’s atmosphere works the same way, only upside-down. Any heat on the surface heats the air via a number of processes, causing it to rise and eventually expend its energy harmlessly in the infinite heat sink of space. Hence, the atmosphere protects us from global warming, and only a hotter Sun can cause that, not the trace amount of CO2 in it. The Earth’s atmosphere is a giant chimney, not greenhouse. Actually, NASA is predicting a cooler Sun in the future, and that will cool the climate, and CO2 can’t stop it.

NASA Predicts Next Solar Cycle will be Lowest in 200 Years (Dalton Minimum Levels) + the Implications - Electroverse

Since scientists knew that CO2 didn’t control climate from way back, the institutionalized and government ones have long been deliberately hoaxing the scientifically illiterate populace for political-economic reasons, and their days are numbered. Actually, scientists way back 150 years ago deserve a bone. They may actually have been confusing the Earth’s atmosphere with a real greenhouse such as a closed car in the sun, where the heat coming in through the windows is trapped by glass, driving the interior temperature up 30F-40F, but the Earth has no glass in the sky, and doesn’t trap hot air but just conducts it to space, achieving a perfect balance 24/7/365.

How hot can the interior of a car get - and how quickly?

Too bad, when global Marxism and the U.N. came along, and regular measurements of atmospheric CO2 showed a year-by-year rise, it began hijacking scientific orgs. along with politicians and media to frame CO2 as something evil in itself, at first to help them destroy the fossil fuel industry after it cleaned up its other emissions, and now to destroy capitalism itself. CO2 is a clean clear odorless gas that’s essential for all life on Earth. More doesn’t mean something bad because plants will love it, greening the Earth and feeding the teeming billions.

Debunked: CO2 Will Not Cause A Food Shortage
Media Attacks. CFACT Rebuts. Media Retreats.

The U.N.’s IPCC doesn’t care about science, or about increasing the global population, only about power and foisting world govt. Like all Marxists, they will let the world burn and billions perish if they can erect a Marxist utopia on the ashes. Don’t let them capture your brain in a glass cage by claiming they have science on their side. If you think that Marxism should rule the world and that the end justifies the means, go for it, but if you’re wiser than that and don’t want to join the vast graveyards left by past Marxists, use your head now and don’t become their useful idiot.

DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THSQqsYvL9o
Some Tricks Climate Alarmists Play
Growing Evidence Of Wind Farms’ Horrific Toll On Wildlife: This Time From India
The Mechanics of Climate Alarm

Think you know physics? I can prove that the CO2 greenhouse warming theory is a hoax with ulterior motives to anybody who has an open mind. Read my essay and take the glass ceiling off your brain. You can bet that the IPCC octopus doesn’t want you to read it because they don’t want you to have an open mind and do want your bank account and healthy wealthy happy lifestyle with it.

Back To The Dark Ages: German Greens Look To Ban All Industrial Farming - The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago