The evil insidious globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC is a global criminal octopus that has long ago compromised the world's scientists, academics, and media in its mad plan to foist world govt. and let the world burn so they can erect a Marxist utopia on its ashes. They don't care about climate, or people, just their fairytale utopia that can't work, but with Marxists the end justifies the means so they just don't care. Don't let them call on the name of science to justify their plans. Science prohibits CO2 from warming the Earth's surface because only the Sun does that. Instead, it's just part of the atmosphere that cools the surface and takes the heat slowly to space, where it is harmlessly released. The Earth's atmosphere is a giant chimney not a greenhouse. CO2 greenhouse warming is a hoax because there's no glass in the sky to keep the heat from escaping to space. A real greenhouse is a closed parked car in the Sun, which can reach interior temps 30F-40F higher than the ambient air, which has already taken solar heat from the Earth's surface, and once it heat leaves can never come back, any more than a rock rolled down a mountain can come back to the top, or heat and smoke from a chimney can return to cook the meal twice. Read my devastating essay that disproves the CO2 greenhouse warming theory with physics and take your mind out of the glass cage the IPCC has been putting around it in order to cage your soul. http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html
It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.
Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).
Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.
The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.
So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.
This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.
So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.
It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad
It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.
-
* Can we really avoid “forever chemicals”?*
* The prologed agonizing over PFAS chemicals is based on the claim that
they are harmful to your health but ...
Annual GWPF lecture: Climate Uncertainty and Risk
-
by Judith Curry My talk on Climate Uncertainty and Risk, presented at the
Annual GWPF Lecture Video of the presentation [here]. My ppt slides can be
downl...
Unforced Variations: May 2024
-
This month’s open thread on climate topics. Many eyes will be focused on
whether April temperatures will be the 11th month in row of records… Note
that w...
How Was Sustainable Development Introduced
-
The lynchpin of U.N. Agenda 2030, originally U.N. Agenda 21, is Sustainable
Development (SD) with its 17 SD goals established by the United Nations’
global...
Fraud Detection and the Presidential Election
-
Since the recent presidential election, I have seen a number of claims
about supposed election fraud. The Trump campaign and allies have filed a
number of ...
Adjust contrast of a pdf free
-
Closer to the eye of the shooter, this is because Preview is quite
literally applying a filter to each individual page of the PDF you are
saving. the proce...
Climate Change Impacts
-
As environmental change influences transportation, it will be paramount to
see how transportation base may be affected over the short- and long haul.
Thi...
Cow Farts causing Global Warming!?
-
Scientists and farmers around the world are debating a very serious subject
at the moment. You may not know it, but cows are actually one of the rudest
an...
Green Printing - Recyled Paper vs. E-Paper
-
One kind of industry rarely discussed among environmental movements is the
paper business.
It seems like such an obvious industry – paper is made from tre...
No comments:
Post a Comment