A significant portion of the climate science literature is nothing more than stamp collecting. By that, I mean papers that identify some tiny new “signal,” often at resolutions far above what we have in the geologic record, and then frame it as a profound discovery. A half-degree wiggle in a proxy, a minor regional anomaly in a model, or a statistical artifact dressed up as “unprecedented change”... all carefully packaged as if it tells us something decisive about global climate trajectories.

https://x.com/MatthewWielicki/status/1956721514910298606