https://cornwallalliance.org/2024/03/why-not-to-worry-about-farmings-contribution-to-global-warming/
My reply:
[[Why? Because CH4’s forcing effect (the amount of infrared radiation, or heat, each molecule in the atmosphere impedes from escaping from Earth’s surface to space, thus warming the surface) is 30 times, and N2O’s 230 times, that of CO2, as illustrated here]]
Zonk!
This is the old fake physics greenhouse effect hoax stretched to absurdity.
Just because low energy density surface IR cooling energy is blocked before reaching space, that doesn't mean it can warm the surface miles below, and even if you make up some explanation that it returns the energy back to the surface to raise the temperature higher than the Sun did, you're pushing a cheap carnival shell game of energy double-counting, because that would require the greenhouse gas molecules to absorb and return the energy BEFORE IT EVEN LEFT!
Any returned surface cooling IR photons would just vanish into the surface's internal energy density, and later reemerge in its IR cooling radiation at some way shorter and higher density wavelength. Meanwhile all the real surface heat energy travels straight through the atmosphere to space at the speed of light, which the greenhouse effect hoaxers studiously ignore.
The greenhouse effect is the main hoax that the global Marxist politician-run U.N./WEF octopus relies on to scare and trick and West into bowing to their idol and surrender their countries to their global Marxist govt. to be run by the U.N. with puppet strings leading to Red China.
You take exception for switching from physics to politics? I have to, because they started it by politicizing science, and I'm trying to finish it. If you're incapable of recognizing the vast global Marxist push on the West that makes news every day, you're definitely going to refuse to accept the truth that their greenhouse effect emperor has no clothes.
Here's the details, if your brain cage still has any chinks:
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-enhanced-greenhouse-effect-1/answer/TL-Winslow
No comments:
Post a Comment