https://climateofsophistry.com/2023/01/31/ferdinand-engelbeen-another-zeta-5th-columnist/
My reply:
[[1. Does the earth’s surface absorb radiant energy from CO2 in the atmosphere or not.
2. Do the back radiation measurements show around 300 W/m2 of downwelling radiant energy
3. And is that absorbed by the earth’s surface or not.]]
The old strawman argument presented as the official explanation from the Ministry of Truth. How many words did you take to counter it, and did you change their mind?
Why play into the IPCC's hands? Just cut to the chase and counter with my super-fast killer disproof of the U.N. IPCC's greenhouse gas warming hoax. It's dead wrong on all levels, and one can disprove it in all kinds of roundabout ways filled with rhetoric and equations that they won't follow, but to shut them up one must only reveal the simple but startling proof that they knew it was bunk all along and resorted to a sleazy carnival energy counting trick to make their useful idiots, a trick that once you see you can't unsee. Too bad, the IPCC has long been building cages around their useful idiots' brains so they won't even peep, but once and awhile this killer bullet might make it through instead of bouncing off, so I for one keep shooting and hope for luck.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-CO2-interacting-with-to-increase-the-temperature-of-the-planet-based-on-the-greenhouse-gas-theory/answer/TL-Winslow
https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-increased-carbon-dioxide-has-a-negligible-effect-on-the-Earths-climate/answer/TL-Winslow
https://www.quora.com/How-many-people-deny-climate-change-because-they-are-not-familiar-with-climate-research-and-therefore-think-I-dont-understand-it-so-it-must-be-wrong/answer/TL-Winslow
No comments:
Post a Comment