Verification of the Greenhouse Effect in the Laboratory

https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/Harde-Schnell-2022-Verification-GHE-Experiment.pdf 

My reply:

[[Often deniers of the GHE argue that radiation from a cooler body cannot be absorbed by a warmer body, as this would be a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. This relatively simple measurement is clear evidence of a wrong interpretation of this law, which explicitly includes the "simultaneous double heat exchange by radiation" (Clausius). In a closed system "the colder body experiences an increase in warmth at the expense of the warmer body", which on its own experiences a lower cooling rate. In an open system with external heating this even leads to an increasing temperature of the warmer body in the presence of additional back radiation from a colder body.]]

Duh, the dude claims that Earth’s atmosphere is a black body, which it can never be, which is the magic bullet killing the whole IPCC beast.

Having swallowed that poison pill, he then tries to disprove the 2nd Law. What a Looney Tunes. Imagine the thousands of hours of work he wasted making fake science look profound. Reminds me of the theological lit. of the Mormons or Jesuits or Scientologists. Score one for the team by making it too complicated to understand, and nobody will try to refute it, keeping your org. safe.

Too bad, my crackling intelligence refuted it in one sentence above.

“Simultaneous double heat exchange by radiation” is ruled by the 2nd Law too, so this moose hockey is pure junk.

TL Winslow's answer to Why do we say "no net heat flow between two objects of different temperatures" but not "no heat flow"?

I didn’t even see a way to enter comments to his junk paper. Typical leftist Ministry of Truth mentality.

https://www.quora.com/What-scientific-experiments-have-been-recently-conducted-to-compare-the-effects-of-different-trace-levels-of-CO2-in-the-atmosphere/answer/TL-Winslow