https://climateofsophistry.com/2020/10/30/this-is-why-they-wont-debate-me/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzzLuTTo76k
My reply:
This laugh track video illustrates how
“climate scientists” are miseducated charlatans who don’t know the first
thing about physics, esp. radiative physics.
Postma’s opponent is so dumb he doesn’t realize that the
Stefan-Boltzman Law applies to instantaneous radiation, but he’s trying
to make it stretch over a period of time to derive the T from the E,
that is, work the equation backwards to get a cheat answer. The Earth
isn’t a bare rock with no atmosphere like the Moon but has a thick
atmosphere that changes everything, sorry for him. A large portion of
solar heat is turned into convection, which is way slower than
radiation, and gets dissipated as it expands under the decreasing
pressure with altitude, ultimately dissipating and removing itself from
the reverse S-B equation. There’s no nifty trick to calculate Earth’s
temperature with one simple algebraic equation. The full solar strength
must be applied to the hemisphere Earth with a computer program that
slowly rotates the Earth while calculating the cooling along the way and
getting net temperatures at each geographic point and altitude. And
that’s with a simplified system with no oceans or clouds.
http://www.historyscoper.com/howmuchdoesthesuncontributetoglobalwarming.html
Worse, Earth surface temperatures have a range of -50C to +50C, and
CO2’s 15 micron wavelength has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C,
which can’t even interfere with it. -80C isn’t heat, and can’t melt an
ice cube, thus CO2’s radiation can’t cause global warming.
http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html
Postma’s opponent is so dumb he doesn’t realize that the Stefan-Boltzman Law applies to instantaneous radiation, but he’s trying to make it stretch over a period of time to derive the T from the E, that is, work the equation backwards to get a cheat answer. The Earth isn’t a bare rock with no atmosphere like the Moon but has a thick atmosphere that changes everything, sorry for him. A large portion of solar heat is turned into convection, which is way slower than radiation, and gets dissipated as it expands under the decreasing pressure with altitude, ultimately dissipating and removing itself from the reverse S-B equation. There’s no nifty trick to calculate Earth’s temperature with one simple algebraic equation. The full solar strength must be applied to the hemisphere Earth with a computer program that slowly rotates the Earth while calculating the cooling along the way and getting net temperatures at each geographic point and altitude. And that’s with a simplified system with no oceans or clouds.
http://www.historyscoper.com/howmuchdoesthesuncontributetoglobalwarming.html
Worse, Earth surface temperatures have a range of -50C to +50C, and CO2’s 15 micron wavelength has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, which can’t even interfere with it. -80C isn’t heat, and can’t melt an ice cube, thus CO2’s radiation can’t cause global warming.
http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html