Response to Roy Spencer Regarding His Support of Flat Earth (video)

https://climateofsophistry.com/2019/06/05/response-to-roy-spencer-regarding-his-support-of-flat-earth/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-ezv5AckDk

My reply:

How lame these so-called scientists are. Didn't they take 2nd year calculus and learn how to do 3-dim. integrals? They should integrate solar radiation over the visible hemisphere taking into account the 3-d structure to get total surface radiation at any given instant, then integrate that over a 24-hour day to get total surface radiation. That definitely won't give the same convenient answer they're getting now with a flat disc Earth where there is no night and dividing by 4. Not that it isn't sick to try to bean-count the entire energy budget of the Earth in hopes of er, cooking the books and coming up with a lying bottom line that creates a fictitious CO2 dragon in the sky, when they need to recognize that the Earth's atmosphere is a giant chimney not greenhouse, and that the Sun's heat is removed by the atmosphere and taken to space, and never vice-versa. Not only that, but the air in the sky is automatically cooled as it rises with the lapse rate formula g/h (gravity divided by heat capacity), meaning that it's cold up in the sky, and there is no second sun up there to increase the surface heat beyond what the Sun did. Heating your kitchen with an ice block on the table is a non-starter. Heat up in the atmosphere is on its way to space, not back down to Earth, and who cares how hot space gets? How sad to realize that one's entire career in so-called climate science is a bust based on upside-down backwards physics. Read my devastating disproof of the CO2 greenhouse warming theory and feel the freedom the truth brings. http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html