The Antarctic Volcanoes Project Blog: Sensors at the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii indicated that concentrations of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, have reached 415 parts of Carbon Dioxide per million - are we racing towards a state very different from what civilization developed in?

Friday, May 17, 2019

Sensors at the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii indicated that concentrations of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, have reached 415 parts of Carbon Dioxide per million - are we racing towards a state very different from what civilization developed in?

https://www.quora.com/Sensors-at-the-Mauna-Loa-observatory-in-Hawaii-indicated-that-concentrations-of-greenhouse-gas-in-the-atmosphere-have-reached-415-parts-of-Carbon-Dioxide-per-million-are-we-racing-towards-a-state-very-different-from/

My reply:

We’re not racing towards any state of runaway global warming, period. It’s a hoax pushed by the insidious global Marxist U.N. IPCC and its horde of compromised scientists, all based on fake physics. Their lust for money and power have hijacked the science so bad with fake climate alarmist stories that it will take a long time to fix it. Meanwhile their political pitch isn’t resonating like they wish, as more people are waking up to their con game and holding tight to their wallets.
The whole con game runs off the Mauna Loa measurements, which have steadily increased year by year starting with 313 ppm in 1958. True, this basic scientific measurement is undeniable, but 415 ppm is only 4.15 parts per ten thousand, and should be of no concern if the IPCC hasn’t blown it out of proportion.

ESRL Global Monitoring Division

Based solely on the Mauna Loa figures, the IPCC colossus has been orchestrating a plot to bilk the U.S. and other fossil fuel-using nations of trillions and distribute it to poor nations in Africa and elsewhere as a form of reparations for our sins, when actually they need to help those nations develop their own fossil fuel industries while they help build enough nuclear power plants for everybody permanently. As hardened Marxists, they don’t care about science, but think they’re outsmarting mainly white people to pay reparations to non-white people for past centuries of oppression, what they call racial justice, when whites haven’t been buying the idea of paying for the sins of their long-dead ancestors by handing their hard-earned wealth the descendants like a free handout.

The scientific con game is to confute infrared fingerprint radiation emitted by all organic molecules and used for identification with fictitious “back radiation”, heavy-duty heat radiation allegedly coming from the CO2 in the sky, making it a second Sun. There is no such physical quantity as back radiation. They just start by measuring fingerprint radiation and run it through Byzantine ad-hoc climate models to produce the fake final figures, currently 327 watts per square meter. Sit in your kitchen and turn on three 100-watt bulbs and a 30-watt bulb on your kitchen table and see if this feels like sitting outdoors at your picnic table on a cloudy day.

Only the most tawdry mendacious special pleading can make this miniscule fraction into a threat to civilization, sorry. Each CO2 molecule is outnumbered about 2500-to-1 by oxygen and nitrogen molecules. Even if a CO2 molecule heats up by 1C, the 2500 surrounding molecules will drag their combined increased temperature down to 1/2500 C. One hot brick in a building doesn’t heat up the building, it’s basic thermodynamics.

415 ppm of CO2 is miniscule compared to history, which has seen 2000 ppm during the Dinosaur Age. It’s barely enough to keep the planet green, not a hazard. How insidious to even talk about removing CO2 from the atmosphere, when that would threaten the existence of plants, on which our lives truly depend.

See an experienced scientist tearing the CO2 greenhouse warming theory to shreds based on basic physics arguments that the IPCC colossus can’t answer, instead resorting to attempts at ostracism and suppression.
Global Warming Contrived Through Fake Science.

Here’s some more good reads that will open your eyes.

The 'Hoax' That is Climate Change! - Jonathan E. P. Moore
https://principia-scientific.org/vilifying-people-who-question-global-warming-is-anti-science/
Media Attacks. CFACT Rebuts. Media Retreats.
RISING CO2 Levels Boost Agricultural Productivity, Human Health
Marc Morano Interview On Climactic UN Species Report
NPR Host: Instill Fear By Saying Climate Change Will Cause Human Extinction: ‘Everyone You Love Will Die!

Read my unanswerable essay that devastates the CO2 greenhouse warming theory with cogent logic. Few who read it still feel threatened by CO2.
TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THSQqsYvL9o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYQ6eZDXXRE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJkkEN-FYBs

No comments:

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago