Wednesday, May 15, 2019

How exactly is the atmosphere affected by climate change?

https://www.quora.com/How-exactly-is-the-atmosphere-affected-by-climate-change

My reply:

This question has been front-loaded by the endless lies of the current crop of compromised scientists controlled by the U.N. and its IPCC, whose real goal is global Marxism. Let’s get real and pull the rabbit out of the hat. Climate change can only be caused by a change in the Sun. If it changes its irradiation, the entire Earth will be affected, from the upper atmosphere to the surface. The U.N. scientists want you to believe that the components in the atmosphere can change the climate, which is true if we’re talking about cooling it, such as by kicking up dust with nukes, but never warming it, because only the Sun can do that. Once your get your mind right and see that, you’ll save yourself from an endless wild goose chase. The atmosphere is not a second Sun in the sky, it’s a chimney that removes heat deposited daily by the Sun and vents it harmlessly to space. Can you make a hot air balloon return to the ground without losing the hot air? Then there’s no power for CO2 to heat the surface where we live, rather it’s already cooled it by lifting some of its heat into the sky, where it goes on its trip to space. Let’s say that CO2 actually heats the atmosphere up high. Guess what: It can’t, because all gases naturally expand and cool as they rise, which is called the lapse rate. Eventually all water that evaporated will come back down, bringing that coolness with it as rain, hail, snow, etc., while cooling the atmosphere too. Never will it warm the surface and cause heat waves. The 1930s were known for severe heat waves, but atmospheric CO2 was low then, hence any new heat waves today having nothing to do with CO2, only the Sun. The record cold waves of recent years give the lie to CO2 having any power to warm the surface any time of the year. CO2 is only 0.04% of the atmosphere, and the other 96.96% can’t warm the surface any more than it can.
The globalist Marxists of the IPCC octopus have long been trying to destroy capitalism, starting with its main engine the fossil fuel industry, and with them the end justifies the means. Despite their tawdry mendacious lies, there’s no need to fear CO2 emissions. Indeed, CO2 is great for the Earth, promising greening and more food for all. Every time you see U.N. Frankenscientists frame CO2 on being bad in any way, tell them to jump in the lake, you’re not buying it.

RISING CO2 Levels Boost Agricultural Productivity, Human Health

Here’s my free essay laying out the proof that CO2 greenhouse warming theory is a scientific hoax based on false physics. One read and you should be free of the hoax forever. No, it won’t teach you everything worth knowing about climate science, but the framing of CO2 as a climate control knob will be devastated forever, and hopefully climate scientists will wake up and revamp their entire approach to take CO2 out of the loop, whether the IPCC likes it or not.

TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change

No comments:

Post a Comment

What Is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project?

It's too bad the current brouhaha about CO2 is so narrowly focused. So what if a higher concentration in the atmosphere raises global average temps? If higher temps were accompanied by increased atmospheric moisture, it would even out around the world and turn it into a paradise planet, greening the deserts so that the teeming billions could be fed. Cold temperatures are inimical to life, not a goal of life.

Too bad, it might take a lot more CO2 than you think to really change the global weather, but not because it has any control over Earth's surface temperatures. In fact atmospheric CO2 can't melt an ice cube with its 15 micron main radiation wavelength that has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice (-78.5C).

Why do they call CO2 greenhouse gas? Because plants breathe it, and they pump it into greenhouses to help them grow and thrive. Polar regions and deserts look good in postcards, but who wants to live there. Meanwhile global pop. is zooming, so obviously the real answer is to pump more CO2 and water vapor into the atmosphere to turn the Earth into a greenhouse, turning deserts both hot and cold into lush green crop-growing regions like 35 million years ago when the avg. global temp was 88F and the CO2 level was 1K parts per million (vs. 415 PPM today). So what if we lose some desert polar regions and even some yummy coastline, the adjustments will be inconvenient but temporary, but I prefer shirt-sleeve weather to Frosty the Snowman. How many arctic animals can't adapt to a warmer climate? What animal needs to live in ice and snow and wouldn't like a vacation to Tahiti? They can lose the fat, hair or feathers.

The real question is can we make and keep the global CO2/H20 levels high enough, and for how long? Sooner or later mass global starvation will become unstoppable if world pop. keeps climbing, and this is the way to forestall it, if we act soon enough. Don't give me them Malthusian objections, give me some CO2/H20 solutions. I like a paradise Earth in the possibility window.

So, while the world is debating the horrors, extent or lack thereof of global warming caused by CO2, let's engineer the CO2/H20 solution to making the Earth a warm temperate planet from pole to pole with no deserts or ice wastelands, allowing vastly more food to be grown and turning poor nations rich. I DON'T mean a planet with wild swings between super-hot summers and super-cold winters, but one that is warmer than now everywhere, but moister and greener, with a giant network of plant life helping to avoid extremes. Since CO2 and water vapor are the keys, and the paltry amounts in the atmosphere need to be increased as soon as possible to turn deserts green and get the warming process off to a good start, but the new levels have to be maintained permanently, I'm looking to remote Antarctica (which is really a sea) as the most promising source for unlimited CO2 and water vapor generation, given that noxious emissions (sulfur dioxide, etc.) can be controlled.

This blog is for posting news on the world climate situation, scientific and political, along with my own articles. I'm sure it will start out with hardly any interest or followers, but I'm hoping that it will attract the smartest people eventually and in the end I hope for a global consensus that if it can be done it must be done.

So what is the Antarctic Volcanoes Project? My working idea is that an international effort to reactivate as many volcanoes in Antarctica as possible in an ideal location for distributing the CO2/H20 will produce the best and most cost-effective results. Sorry, one-worlders, it won't give you a license to override and control any country's economy, but if your country is suffering from lack of food you will be too busy expanding farming to care. Hence until I think of or hear about a better way to increase world CO2/H20 levels, this is my pet project. If you are a scientist, please climb aboard my AVP Express and let's make it happen.

It Would Be Funny If It Were's So Sad

It would be funny it weren't so sad, but when the scientists say "greenhouse gas" they are using a malaprop. It should be greenhouse GLASS, because that's why a greenhouse stays warm, by glass walls stopping convection of air and trapping heat. Yes, CO2 is pumped into greenhouses, but not for heating purposes, only to help plants BREATHE. So the whole sucker's game of "greenhouse gas" must truly be for the purpose of stopping more vegetation from growing and feeding the teeming billions. Is that their true goal? Another blip on the horizon is the promise of melting permafrost releasing gigantic amounts of CO2 from the Arctic not Antarctic sector. Let's hope we at least get some more good CO2 that way.

Jan. 14, 2011. Good article on CO2 levels and global temps 30-40 million years ago

Aug. 31, 2011. Giant pipe and balloon to pump water into the sky in climate experiment

May 31, 2013. Scientists find that higher CO2 levels green arid regions

Mar. 30, 2015. Higher atmospheric CO2 levels causing boom in vegetation

Aug. 2015. 'Unprecedented' volcanic eruption released enough water vapor to heat Earth: report

Aug. 15, 2017. Scientists find 91 new volcanoes miles beneath Antarctica's thick ice sheet

How Much CO2 Do Volcanoes Emit?

Will a major volcanic eruption fix climate change? - James Matkin

Part of the heat is coming from beneath our feet

Did any volcanoes erupt in 2020?

T.L. Winslow (TLW, the Historyscoper (tm)

My Blog List

Total Pageviews