https://principia-scientific.org/polar-vortex-of-stupidity/
The global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC/WEF octopus of anti-Big Oil leftists is trying to eat the world by weaponizing the fake greenhouse effect. Global warming is good not bad, and more not less CO2 and H20 need to be pumped into the atmosphere to create more living space and food supplies.
Thursday, January 31, 2019
Wednesday, January 30, 2019
Who is pulling the strings on US climate change denial?
https://www.quora.com/Who-is-pulling-the-strings-on-US-climate-change-denial/
https://www.quora.com/Who-is-pulling-the-strings-on-US-climate-change-denial/answer/TL-Winslow
My reply:
It’s obsolete news that Big Oil used to fund climate skeptics when they thought their income was being threatened. Long ago they switched to funding the other side because they realized there were trillions to make from a Green New Deal. Too bad, the skeptics stuck to their guns because they knew that they were actually right that CO2 was being framed as a climate control knob, and that the fossil fuel companies were saved by the truth whether they realized it or not. But money distorts everything, so who knows how it will come out. Anybody trying to live through the coldest winter in recorded North American history should smell a rat about CO2 warming anything. What did it do, turn to dry ice and fall back to the ground? :)
https://canadafreepress.com/article/funding-the-climate-industrial-complex
The basic physics that prove that CO2 in the atmosphere can’t warm the Earth’s surface is explained in my article:
TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change
The complete history of the climate debate is laid out fact by fact if you have the patience and can keep your mind from exploding:
TLW's Climatescope™, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™
https://www.quora.com/Who-is-pulling-the-strings-on-US-climate-change-denial/answer/TL-Winslow
My reply:
It’s obsolete news that Big Oil used to fund climate skeptics when they thought their income was being threatened. Long ago they switched to funding the other side because they realized there were trillions to make from a Green New Deal. Too bad, the skeptics stuck to their guns because they knew that they were actually right that CO2 was being framed as a climate control knob, and that the fossil fuel companies were saved by the truth whether they realized it or not. But money distorts everything, so who knows how it will come out. Anybody trying to live through the coldest winter in recorded North American history should smell a rat about CO2 warming anything. What did it do, turn to dry ice and fall back to the ground? :)
https://canadafreepress.com/article/funding-the-climate-industrial-complex
The basic physics that prove that CO2 in the atmosphere can’t warm the Earth’s surface is explained in my article:
TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change
The complete history of the climate debate is laid out fact by fact if you have the patience and can keep your mind from exploding:
TLW's Climatescope™, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™
Are 'historic' low temperatures a positive step for global warming?
https://www.quora.com/Are-historic-low-temperatures-a-positive-step-for-global-warming/
https://www.quora.com/Are-historic-low-temperatures-a-positive-step-for-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow
My reply:
What global warming? It’s a hoax based on tricked-up computer-generated statistics of a non-physical make-believe “global average temperature”. The Northern Hemisphere is currently going through its coldest winter in recorded history, not because of some side-effect of global warming, but because there’s a huge amount of cold air that CO2 has no effect on. If CO2 really caused any kind of warming there wouldn’t be any cold air in the first place, and winters would be snow-free. That shows up the CO2 global warming hoaxers as the emperor with no clothes, and gives them away as con artists out to get into your pocket to slay an imaginary dragon. Summers aren’t really that hot compared to the 1930s, but the super-cold winters seem more indicative of a coming mini ice age than a catastrophic runaway global warming. Trouble is by the time it’s indisputable the U.N. IPCC extortionists plan to already have bilked the Western world of trillions to give to Africa et al. with alarmists predictions set decades in the future that never come true.
It’s basic physics that CO2 in the atmosphere can’t warm the surface, because no body can warm itself with its own heat, which includes the Earth as a whole, and no cooler body like the atmosphere can warm a hotter body like the surface because the opposite will happen instead. Only the sun heats the surface, and all the atmosphere does is take the heat up and out to space. The Byzantine mathematical con game called radiative forcing is one of the scandals of science history, and an entire generation of climate science grads needs to demand their money back and train for useful careers.
Here’s my explanation of the CO2 global warming hoax in simple terms for all who want to know:
TLW's Climatescope™, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™
(http://www.historyscoper.com/climatescope.html)
https://www.quora.com/Are-historic-low-temperatures-a-positive-step-for-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow
My reply:
What global warming? It’s a hoax based on tricked-up computer-generated statistics of a non-physical make-believe “global average temperature”. The Northern Hemisphere is currently going through its coldest winter in recorded history, not because of some side-effect of global warming, but because there’s a huge amount of cold air that CO2 has no effect on. If CO2 really caused any kind of warming there wouldn’t be any cold air in the first place, and winters would be snow-free. That shows up the CO2 global warming hoaxers as the emperor with no clothes, and gives them away as con artists out to get into your pocket to slay an imaginary dragon. Summers aren’t really that hot compared to the 1930s, but the super-cold winters seem more indicative of a coming mini ice age than a catastrophic runaway global warming. Trouble is by the time it’s indisputable the U.N. IPCC extortionists plan to already have bilked the Western world of trillions to give to Africa et al. with alarmists predictions set decades in the future that never come true.
It’s basic physics that CO2 in the atmosphere can’t warm the surface, because no body can warm itself with its own heat, which includes the Earth as a whole, and no cooler body like the atmosphere can warm a hotter body like the surface because the opposite will happen instead. Only the sun heats the surface, and all the atmosphere does is take the heat up and out to space. The Byzantine mathematical con game called radiative forcing is one of the scandals of science history, and an entire generation of climate science grads needs to demand their money back and train for useful careers.
Here’s my explanation of the CO2 global warming hoax in simple terms for all who want to know:
TLW's Climatescope™, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™
(http://www.historyscoper.com/climatescope.html)
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
Monday, January 28, 2019
Where can I find reliable scientific research and examples on the effects of climate change to our environment?
https://www.quora.com/Where-can-I-find-reliable-scientific-research-and-examples-on-the-effects-of-climate-change-to-our-environment
https://www.quora.com/Where-can-I-find-reliable-scientific-research-and-examples-on-the-effects-of-climate-change-to-our-environment/answer/TL-Winslow
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/Where-can-I-find-reliable-scientific-research-and-examples-on-the-effects-of-climate-change-to-our-environment/answer/TL-Winslow
My reply:
Because of the gigantic influence of the U.N. IPCC with its demands for trillions of baksheesh, you can’t really trust any so-called scientific research on the effects of climate change unless you carefully weed out the alarmist predictions set decades in the future. Not that you shouldn’t look the papers over, but you need to let the other side have its say by checking out their blogs, which the official establishment doesn’t want you to see because they’re good at exposing their dirty laundry. Here’s a list of blogs on both sides in case you want to join some mailing lists and get a regular string of articles in your mailbox:
TLW's Climate Blog List
Here’s my blog that provides daily links to the articles I’ve read, which is currently the best source on the subject because I read more articles than anybody.
The Antarctic Volcanoes Project Blog
TLW's Climate Blog List
Here’s my blog that provides daily links to the articles I’ve read, which is currently the best source on the subject because I read more articles than anybody.
The Antarctic Volcanoes Project Blog
What is the strongest piece of evidence of global warming to convince a climate denier?
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-strongest-piece-of-evidence-of-global-warming-to-convince-a-climate-denier/
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-strongest-piece-of-evidence-of-global-warming-to-convince-a-climate-denier/answer/TL-Winslow
That time that it was hotter than a firecracker on the Fourth of July all year, and all the snow disappeared and the lakes all dried up everywhere :)
So far the gigantic U.N. IPCC blackmailing colossus has only managed to claim a measly .1C-.2C of warming per decade in their bizarre Byzantine computer-generated non-physical global avg. temperature scam, which is used by their useful idiots to spread alarmist stories of horrors decades in the future, while they hold their hands out now and offer no money-back guarantee. Nobody with any brains who isn’t a leftist Marxist who thinks he’s smarter than everybody else even pretends to buy it, and the more strident they get in pushing it and condemning doubters, the more we know they’re selling snake oil. I guess us skeptics are just going to wait all those decades and see if their Armageddon prophecies were true, then see how they deny knowledge of their own actions and launch a new campaign to stop the coming ice age, at the usual premium rate :)
If you want to get serious, start studying the history of this epic struggle my way, fact by fact, and see what new light dawns on you as your mind grows. TLW's Climatescope™, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-strongest-piece-of-evidence-of-global-warming-to-convince-a-climate-denier/answer/TL-Winslow
That time that it was hotter than a firecracker on the Fourth of July all year, and all the snow disappeared and the lakes all dried up everywhere :)
So far the gigantic U.N. IPCC blackmailing colossus has only managed to claim a measly .1C-.2C of warming per decade in their bizarre Byzantine computer-generated non-physical global avg. temperature scam, which is used by their useful idiots to spread alarmist stories of horrors decades in the future, while they hold their hands out now and offer no money-back guarantee. Nobody with any brains who isn’t a leftist Marxist who thinks he’s smarter than everybody else even pretends to buy it, and the more strident they get in pushing it and condemning doubters, the more we know they’re selling snake oil. I guess us skeptics are just going to wait all those decades and see if their Armageddon prophecies were true, then see how they deny knowledge of their own actions and launch a new campaign to stop the coming ice age, at the usual premium rate :)
If you want to get serious, start studying the history of this epic struggle my way, fact by fact, and see what new light dawns on you as your mind grows. TLW's Climatescope™, by T.L. Winslow (TLW), "The Historyscoper"™
Sunday, January 27, 2019
Saturday, January 26, 2019
NASA states the current density of CO2 is 435 parts per million and that mankind accounts for about 2% of total emissions. Thus, humans account for about 1 particle in 115,000. Is the whole premise of climate change without foundation in physics?
https://www.quora.com/NASA-states-the-current-density-of-CO2-is-435-parts-per-million-and-that-mankind-accounts-for-about-2-of-total-emissions-Thus-humans-account-for-about-1-particle-in-115-000-Is-the-whole-premise-of-climate-change
https://www.quora.com/NASA-states-the-current-density-of-CO2-is-435-parts-per-million-and-that-mankind-accounts-for-about-2-of-total-emissions-Thus-humans-account-for-about-1-particle-in-115-000-Is-the-whole-premise-of-climate-change/answer/TL-Winslow
https://www.quora.com/NASA-states-the-current-density-of-CO2-is-435-parts-per-million-and-that-mankind-accounts-for-about-2-of-total-emissions-Thus-humans-account-for-about-1-particle-in-115-000-Is-the-whole-premise-of-climate-change/answer/TL-Winslow
Friday, January 25, 2019
Thursday, January 24, 2019
Wednesday, January 23, 2019
Tuesday, January 22, 2019
Monday, January 21, 2019
Sunday, January 20, 2019
Climate Advocates Underestimate Power of Fossil Fueled Misinformation Campaigns, Say Top Researchers
https://www.desmogblog.com/2019/01/18/climate-advocates-underestimate-power-fossil-fuel-misinformation-campaign-brulle
My reply:
"2nd law talks about the net flow of energy and doesn't forbid some flow from cool to hot"? Duh, you're the one guilty of misrepresentation.Quick! Patent your new reverse heat engine and get rich ! :) You need to go back to science for dummies, e.g. https://www.dummies.com/education/science/physics/flowing-from-hot-to-cold-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/ Your whole house is built on cards. What are you going to do when the alarmists' climate armageddon fails to materialize? Erase your whole Internet presence? :) Just because the fossil fuel industry senses trouble with leftist greenies and funds some scientists for self-preservation doesn't make them wrong any more than the fact that alarmist scientists are being funded by the U.N. Marxist global octopus makes them right. There's nothing more fundamental than the laws of thermodynamics, and they are against the moose hockey about CO2 "trapping heat" and "sending it back down to Earth". Sorry, the smoke from a chimney can't send the heat back down and cook the meal twice. The Earth is a giant chimney or stovepipe, not a greenhouse, venting all heat from the surface into the infinite heat sink of outer space forever. Calling the Earth a greenhouse is moronic because there's no giant layer of glass up in the sky, and 0.04% concentration of CO2 is no substitute. Climate changes are caused by changes in the amount of sunlight reaching the surface, not the amount of heat sent by the nonexistent CO2 dragon in the sky, so CO2 is being framed for insidious political purposes and the rest is moose hockey. Ever wonder how alarmists explain how seeding the sky with sulfur dioxide to block sunlight cools the surface when that would "trap heat" which should be "sent back down to Earth" by the dragon in the sky? :) Once heat is removed from the surface by convection and radiation, it never comes back, and is of no importance unless we build cloud cities. Here's a simple proof that the First Law of Thermodynamics refutes the CO2 Greenhouse Gas Warming Theory: https://climateofsophistry.com/2019/01/14/first-law-of-thermodynamics-refutes-climate-alarm-proof-of-nikolov-zeller/ Here's my even simpler and more devastating analysis that even you can understand if you still have an open mind: http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html
My reply:
"2nd law talks about the net flow of energy and doesn't forbid some flow from cool to hot"? Duh, you're the one guilty of misrepresentation.Quick! Patent your new reverse heat engine and get rich ! :) You need to go back to science for dummies, e.g. https://www.dummies.com/education/science/physics/flowing-from-hot-to-cold-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/ Your whole house is built on cards. What are you going to do when the alarmists' climate armageddon fails to materialize? Erase your whole Internet presence? :) Just because the fossil fuel industry senses trouble with leftist greenies and funds some scientists for self-preservation doesn't make them wrong any more than the fact that alarmist scientists are being funded by the U.N. Marxist global octopus makes them right. There's nothing more fundamental than the laws of thermodynamics, and they are against the moose hockey about CO2 "trapping heat" and "sending it back down to Earth". Sorry, the smoke from a chimney can't send the heat back down and cook the meal twice. The Earth is a giant chimney or stovepipe, not a greenhouse, venting all heat from the surface into the infinite heat sink of outer space forever. Calling the Earth a greenhouse is moronic because there's no giant layer of glass up in the sky, and 0.04% concentration of CO2 is no substitute. Climate changes are caused by changes in the amount of sunlight reaching the surface, not the amount of heat sent by the nonexistent CO2 dragon in the sky, so CO2 is being framed for insidious political purposes and the rest is moose hockey. Ever wonder how alarmists explain how seeding the sky with sulfur dioxide to block sunlight cools the surface when that would "trap heat" which should be "sent back down to Earth" by the dragon in the sky? :) Once heat is removed from the surface by convection and radiation, it never comes back, and is of no importance unless we build cloud cities. Here's a simple proof that the First Law of Thermodynamics refutes the CO2 Greenhouse Gas Warming Theory: https://climateofsophistry.com/2019/01/14/first-law-of-thermodynamics-refutes-climate-alarm-proof-of-nikolov-zeller/ Here's my even simpler and more devastating analysis that even you can understand if you still have an open mind: http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html
Saturday, January 19, 2019
Friday, January 18, 2019
Thursday, January 17, 2019
Wednesday, January 16, 2019
What are greenhouse gases? What percentage of them are natural (not caused by man)? How do they impact the world?
Tuesday, January 15, 2019
Monday, January 14, 2019
What are the climatic conditions (and how long would they have to last) that would be required for climate change alarmists to be satisfied that there is no problem and no further actions need to be taken?
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-climatic-conditions-and-how-long-would-they-have-to-last-that-would-be-required-for-climate-change-alarmists-to-be-satisfied-that-there-is-no-problem-and-no-further-actions-need-to-be-taken
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-climatic-conditions-and-how-long-would-they-have-to-last-that-would-be-required-for-climate-change-alarmists-to-be-satisfied-that-there-is-no-problem-and-no-further-actions-need-to-be-taken/answer/TL-Winslow
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-climatic-conditions-and-how-long-would-they-have-to-last-that-would-be-required-for-climate-change-alarmists-to-be-satisfied-that-there-is-no-problem-and-no-further-actions-need-to-be-taken/answer/TL-Winslow
Sunday, January 13, 2019
Warmer Than Thought? GWPF Science Editor Sceptical About New Ocean-Warming Paper
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2019/01/13/warmer-than-thought-gwpf-science-editor-sceptical-about-new-ocean-warming-paper/
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-climatic-conditions-and-how-long-would-they-have-to-last-that-would-be-required-for-climate-change-alarmists-to-be-satisfied-that-there-is-no-problem-and-no-further-actions-need-to-be-taken/answer/TL-Winslow
Saturday, January 12, 2019
Friday, January 11, 2019
Thursday, January 10, 2019
Wednesday, January 9, 2019
What does Climate Change mean?
https://www.quora.com/What-does-Climate-Change-mean
My reply:
Sorry, but despite all those hockey stick graphs in the other answers there are a growing number of scientists revolting against the CO2 Greenhouse Warming hoax, which relies on tricked-up average global average temperatures to help the U.N. extort trillions from various govts. whose scientists they have already coopted.
Rather than repeat the proof here, I cite a recent article by a scientist exploding the whole scam:
Here is a link to a recent open resignation letter by an English scientist expressing his disgust with his colleagues for perpetuating the hoax, with the soundbyte:
“Each of the six main hypotheses that make up the overall AGW hypotheses are wrongly based, faulted or exaggerated.”
A study of the history of climate science clearly shows how the hoax got started in the 19th century with a misunderstanding of physics and thermodynamics and got taken up by Marxists globalists as a tool to push their one world govt. agenda.
You can be sure that the AGW establishment won’t even look at any of this material, and doesn’t want you to free your minds, because they want to get into your wallet.
Tuesday, January 8, 2019
Monday, January 7, 2019
Sunday, January 6, 2019
What would it take to convince "climate change" enthusiasts that the Sun affects the Earth's climate?
https://www.quora.com/What-would-it-take-to-convince-climate-change-enthusiasts-that-the-Sun-affects-the-Earths-climate
My reply:
The T in your equation is the final temperature of the Earth as seen from space. It says nothing about the temperature distribution from the surface on up. This is why CO2 global warming theory is a giant hoax, because CO2 is part of the atmosphere, and the whole atmosphere cools the surface after the Sun heats it by convection, taking the heat to the infinite heat sink of outer space. Any infrared radiation from the surface absorbed on the way up is just more heat lost by the surface, which goes on up to space too. There is no way any of that heat can return to the surface, so who cares about it? If you stand behind the man with the flamethrower you won’t get burned. Smoke rises from a fireplace and goes out the chimney, and if the chimney is not blocked it will never send the heat back down to cook the meal twice. Humans don’t need to worry about temperatures way up in the atmosphere unless/until they build cloud cities. The globalists in the U.N. have hijacked climate science in order to extort trillions for their starry-eyed scheme to foist a Marxist one world govt. on everybody.
http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html
My reply:
The T in your equation is the final temperature of the Earth as seen from space. It says nothing about the temperature distribution from the surface on up. This is why CO2 global warming theory is a giant hoax, because CO2 is part of the atmosphere, and the whole atmosphere cools the surface after the Sun heats it by convection, taking the heat to the infinite heat sink of outer space. Any infrared radiation from the surface absorbed on the way up is just more heat lost by the surface, which goes on up to space too. There is no way any of that heat can return to the surface, so who cares about it? If you stand behind the man with the flamethrower you won’t get burned. Smoke rises from a fireplace and goes out the chimney, and if the chimney is not blocked it will never send the heat back down to cook the meal twice. Humans don’t need to worry about temperatures way up in the atmosphere unless/until they build cloud cities. The globalists in the U.N. have hijacked climate science in order to extort trillions for their starry-eyed scheme to foist a Marxist one world govt. on everybody.
http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html
How can we decrease global warming?
https://www.quora.com/How-can-we-decrease-global-warming
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/How-can-we-decrease-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow
Sorry, but humans have no control over climate, because CO2 has no control over surface temperatures and has been framed by globalists who want to blackmail the world for trillions to shut down the fossil fuel industry and find it the perfect con game to neutralize opposition. Even back in the 1930s when CO2 levels were in the mid-300s, there was horrific weather and tragedies almost every week, but humans could do nothing about it anymore than they can now. The globalists working out of the U.N. don’t care if they can deliver any control of the climate because all they want is the money and the complete Marxist one world govt. utopia that levels rich and poor countries by making everybody poor slaves with no control over their lives or thoughts. I hope the U.S. at least doesn’t buy it because for 200+ years it’s been the last hope of humanity for freedom and prosperity and a bastion against Communism, resisting wave after wave and coming out stronger each time. Every time Marxism has taken over other countries, it has resulted in disaster and horror, as a study of history will show. Too bad history teaching is in the dumps by design, since Marxist teachers with greedy eyes on the future don’t want students to know the truth about the past. They actually dispose of the entire history of America by labeling it racist, trivializing study of actual facts. As to global climate, there’s just as much if not more evidence of a coming mini ice age as runaway warming.
1 View
Saturday, January 5, 2019
Friday, January 4, 2019
Another Beast From The East?
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2019/01/04/another-beast-from-the-east/
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-best-evidence-you-ve-come-across-that-disapproves-the-theory-of-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-best-evidence-you-ve-come-across-that-disapproves-the-theory-of-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow
You mean the CO2 Greenhouse Theory? It’s been disproved as a cause of global warming since day one, because the laws of thermodynamics don’t allow a cooler body to heat a warmer one, hence CO2 way up in the atmosphere can absorb all the energy it wants from the surface, but by definition the surface was already cooled by losing it, and it can never come back, but just continues on its way to the infinite heat sink of outer space. Only the Sun heats the surface each day. CO2 helps cool the surface by taking heat away from it, so the CO2 Greenhouse Theory has been misapplied and can’t explain global warming. If it were even a little bit true then we’d long ago had winters without snow, not the Beast from the East.
Read my take that makes it simple that it’s really about global Marxism attempting a takeover, not about science, which has been hijacked by a big lie: