The global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC/WEF octopus of anti-Big Oil leftists is trying to eat the world by weaponizing the fake greenhouse effect. Global warming is good not bad, and more not less CO2 and H20 need to be pumped into the atmosphere to create more living space and food supplies.
Monday, February 17, 2014
“Meet the Press” pretends Marsha Blackburn has reasonable ideas about climate science because “debate”
Yes, the fact that 90+% of scientists agree on something makes it so right that STFU no debates, just submit. I heard that one before, it's called ISLAM :) Back in 1543, 99.999% of scientists agreed that Copernicus was full of it, and told him to STFU too, and turned out to be WRONG. So instead of repeating history, Salon should be in favor of all the debates they can get because that will give them their chance to convince the other x%. Why not? They're like preachers with gay yearnings and don't want to get converted themselves by the cute butts of their opponents? :) Why doesn't Salon show some respect to the minority who have made up their minds the other way, as well as the truly elite like moi who haven't made their minds up yet, and want more info.? A fair balanced article showing the strengths and weaknesses of each side seems beyond Salon's range, eh?
Here's where to get a treasure trove of links to articles on the climate debate on all sides going back years so you can do it my way:
My reply:
ReplyDeleteYes, the fact that 90+% of scientists agree on something makes it so right that STFU no debates, just submit. I heard that one before, it's called ISLAM :) Back in 1543, 99.999% of scientists agreed that Copernicus was full of it, and told him to STFU too, and turned out to be WRONG. So instead of repeating history, Salon should be in favor of all the debates they can get because that will give them their chance to convince the other x%. Why not? They're like preachers with gay yearnings and don't want to get converted themselves by the cute butts of their opponents? :) Why doesn't Salon show some respect to the minority who have made up their minds the other way, as well as the truly elite like moi who haven't made their minds up yet, and want more info.? A fair balanced article showing the strengths and weaknesses of each side seems beyond Salon's range, eh?
Here's where to get a treasure trove of links to articles on the climate debate on all sides going back years so you can do it my way:
http://antarcticvolcanoesproject.blogspot.com/