https://www.livescience.com/ice-melange-thinning-threatens-ice-shelves
The global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC/WEF octopus of anti-Big Oil leftists is trying to eat the world by weaponizing the fake greenhouse effect. Global warming is good not bad, and more not less CO2 and H20 need to be pumped into the atmosphere to create more living space and food supplies.
Thursday, September 30, 2021
Wednesday, September 29, 2021
Tuesday, September 28, 2021
How CO2 Saves the Earth: Greenhouse Gas have Vital Warming & Cooling Effects
My reply:
Once again, the lie that never dies is peddled as common knowledge.
The lie is that the T^4 Stefan-Boltzmann Law can be inverted so that surface photons returned to the Earth's surface can reraise its temperature. The truth is that the temperature of the surface causes radiation that follows the S-B Law, but not vice-versa.In the case of the Earth's surface, the only heating is caused by solar radiation at 0.4-0.8 microns, raising the temperature to the range of -50C to +50C, with a wavelength range of 8-13 microns. Returning the longer wavelength radiation doesn't make the tail wag the dog and reheat the surface to the same temperature that the Sun did.
This lie is based on the bigger lie that all photons of any wavelength have the same power to raise the temperature of an absorbing material based on raw energy (Joules) alone. The truth is that a rod of temperature T cools by emitting radiation controlled by Planck's Radiation Law, whose power curve has a peak power wavelength dependent solely on T, independent of the material, meaning that its radiation can't raise the temperature of an absorbing material higher than T, regardless of the material. Thus, CO2's 15 micron radiation absorption/emission wavelength has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice, hence its radiation is indistinguishable from an iron rod cooled to -80C, which can't melt an ice cube, much less cause global warming. The U.N. IPCC lie machine tries to twist the science like a pretzel with ridiculous arguments about energy balance at the top of the atmosphere, claiming that the surface will magically increase its temperature to maintain the balance without any feedback signal or any increased radiation energy input at any temperature. It's fantasy and magic, not science. The IPCC just wishes that atmospheric CO2 can cause global warming, and jumps to save us from our anxieties by demanding trillions, with no money-back guarantee, intending the money to be used for redistribution of wealth using climate as a punch line. Since it's currently picking up steam daily, the hardened global Marxists at the top of the IPCC must be laughing all the way to the bank.
https://www.quora.com/Without-greenhouse-gases-in-the-atmosphere-would-Earth-be-able-to-dissipate-enough-heath-to-stay-cool/answer/TL-Winslow
Do you agree with the following by a radiation physicist? “There is NO Climate Emergency … doubling CO2 makes no difference” This isn't a poll. If your answer doesn't include empirical evidence to support your position I will delete your answer. - Terigi Ciccone , Author "A Hitchhiker's Journey Through Climate Change"
Monday, September 27, 2021
With President Biden now at the helm, America is on the cusp of... The Great Reset URGENT WARNING: Sinister plan the U.S. Federal Reserve has been working on since 2015… finally being rolled out with help from 80% of world banks. Prominent member of a US commerce organization speaks out on what this means for every American.
Sunday, September 26, 2021
Saturday, September 25, 2021
Friday, September 24, 2021
Thursday, September 23, 2021
Wednesday, September 22, 2021
Tuesday, September 21, 2021
Monday, September 20, 2021
Sunday, September 19, 2021
Oil Industry Wages Major Lobbying Campaign to Kill Proposed Methane Fee After expressing support for carbon pricing earlier this year, the American Petroleum Institute and other oil lobby groups are pressuring Congress to not put a tax on methane. Critics see yet another cynical attempt to block climate action.
Saturday, September 18, 2021
Friday, September 17, 2021
Thursday, September 16, 2021
Wednesday, September 15, 2021
Global Warming Driven by Relative Humidity Decrease, Not CO2 GHG! Solution: More Ocean Evaporation
Reply:
Water vapor can't warm the Earth's surface. At most at night it can slow cooling by backing up convection to the ground. The rest of the time it's a pure cooling agent, starting with removing lots of surface heat via evaporation, then later dropping frigid precipitation from on high. Higher low temperatures aren't global warming, period. The IPCC has messed up your heads.
https://www.quora.com/If-burning-methane-makes-CO-2-is-burning-natgas-good-for-the-environment/answer/TL-Winslow
Tuesday, September 14, 2021
If we dug milions of pits like mine shafts into the earth, would a lot of the CO2 in the atmosphere, being a denser heavier gas than O2 and N2 and others, fall into these holes via density displacement and be trapped here, thus sequestering it? -TL Winslow , Pansophist master of STEM and world history
Monday, September 13, 2021
Sunday, September 12, 2021
Saturday, September 11, 2021
Friday, September 10, 2021
Thursday, September 9, 2021
Wednesday, September 8, 2021
KATHARINE HAYHOE, CLIMATE SCIENTIST
https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/12/25/what-if-science/
My reply:
[[Why do we care about carbon dioxide? We care about it because our planet has this amazing natural blanket. That natural blanket is totally transparent to energy from the sun. The energy from the sun comes in and hits the earth and the earth heats up. And then the earth heats up and gives off heat and those little invisible particles of carbon dioxide, methane, and water vapor trap that heat inside the earth system.]]
This woman is brain-dead. Earth system? The atmosphere is 6 miles thick, and its temperature systematically drops by 18.8F per mi., reaching very frigid temperatures. Only near the surface are the temperatures livable. So how does this blanket keep heat from rising like it naturally does, straight into the frigid zone?
Kayhoe is a baby at physics, leaving her stuck at the starting blocks in the race to understand Earth's climate. I hope she reads some of my numerous patient explanations of the real physics and changes her tune. Here's one for beginners like her.
https://www.quora.com/Without-greenhouse-gases-in-the-atmosphere-would-Earth-be-able-to-dissipate-enough-heath-to-stay-cool/answer/TL-Winslow
Tuesday, September 7, 2021
Five Science Questions: a Quiz Part 2
https://principia-scientific.com/five-science-questions-a-quiz-part-2/
My reply:
The secret word for today is quiet. Stop listening to the outrageous lies of the IPCC lie machine that are just trying to get your money and see through their barge of academic papers confusing the simple physics to keep your alarmed enough to want to "sacrifice" for their cause..
The simple physical fact is that atmospheric CO2 has almost the same radiation as a piece of dry ice, and weaker, with monochrome radiation at 15 microns rather than a complete Planck black body radiation spectrum that peaks there. The temperature of dry ice is -80C (really a little warmer), so its radiation is the same as an that from an iron bar chilled to -80C, which can't heat anything at any range. There is nothing else to this outrageous lie that atmospheric CO2 can cause global temperatures to rise. Its radiation bounces back and forth among atmospheric CO2 molecules, and some bounces harmlessly off Earth's surface until it's dissipated by entropy and joins the heat death of the Universe. Meanwhile the Sun heats the Earth's surface only to a range of about -50C to +50C, and atmospheric CO2's -80C radiation absorption wavelength lets surface thermal IR pass by untouched, proving that it has no effect on the weather or climate, and that its concentration doesn't matter, so CO2 emissions are no threat.
The IPCC trolls can only shout that I'm spreading "misinformation" and call for me to be silenced leftist-style, but can never produce a scientific refutation, because they've politicized science to serve their agenda and scientific truth trumps politics.
Help me wake up the general public to the simplicity of the physics with simple slogans like "CO2's -80C radiation can't melt an ice cube". Just Say No to the IPCC and its -80C.
https://www.quora.com/Without-greenhouse-gases-in-the-atmosphere-would-Earth-be-able-to-dissipate-enough-heath-to-stay-cool/answer/TL-Winslow