https://electroverse.net/summer-snow-in-the-higher-elevations-of-europe/
Monday, August 31, 2020
Sunday, August 30, 2020
“Smart bricks” is a novel concept in energy storage Researchers are working to convert the world’s cheapest and most familiar building material into energy storage units Faisal Khan Faisal Khan Aug 26 · 3 min read This is a typical example of how technology can be put to good use to convert something like a red brick — the most common and the cheapest building material which doesn’t do much…
Saturday, August 29, 2020
New confirmation that climate models overstate atmospheric warming
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/08/27/new-confirmation-that-climate-models-overstate-atmospheric-warming/
My reply:
For a computer climate model to put ANY CO2-caused global warming in the code automatically invalidates it, yet the global Marxists at the U.N. and their IPCC demand it just to get funding. -80C isn't heat. CO2 doesn't absorb or emit heat, period. It's a pure fake physics hoax. Wake up and help laugh them away before they create a true tragedy for humanity.
http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html
My reply:
For a computer climate model to put ANY CO2-caused global warming in the code automatically invalidates it, yet the global Marxists at the U.N. and their IPCC demand it just to get funding. -80C isn't heat. CO2 doesn't absorb or emit heat, period. It's a pure fake physics hoax. Wake up and help laugh them away before they create a true tragedy for humanity.
http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html
Friday, August 28, 2020
Thursday, August 27, 2020
Wednesday, August 26, 2020
Tuesday, August 25, 2020
Monday, August 24, 2020
Sunday, August 23, 2020
Carbon emissions are chilling the atmosphere 90km above Antarctica, at the edge of space
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/08/22/carbon-emissions-are-chilling-the-atmosphere-90km-above-antarctica-at-the-edge-of-space/
My reply:
[[Our results show that in the high atmosphere above Antarctica, carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases do not have the warming effect they do in the lower atmosphere (by colliding with other molecules). Instead the excess energy is radiated to space, causing a cooling effect.]]
How long can the leftist-run U.N. IPCC keep getting away with their sick fake physics CO2 global warming hoax?
CO2 absorbs radiation at 15 microns, which has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C = 193K = -112F, which can’t melt an ice cube, whose Planck radiation max wavelength by the way is 10.6 microns.
CO2’s other absorption wavelengths are 2.7 microns and 4.3 microns. 2.7 microns corresponds to a Planck radiation temperature of 797C (1070K) (1466F), and 4.3 microns corresponds to one of 401C (675K) (755F), neither of which the Earth’s surface is capable of reaching outside of volcanoes.
Actually, those short wavelengths are found in the sunlight in the stratosphere, allowing CO2 molecules to absorb and block that energy from reaching the surface. You can call it a cooling effect if you want, but what’s really cooled is the surface.
Never can CO2 heat anything, period. -80C isn’t heat. Cold isn’t heat. Cold is cold. Therefore, we never have to worry about CO2 emissions, and any attempt to punish anybody for them is a scam.
Notice the comment “by colliding with other molecules”. As 0.04% of the atmosphere CO2 molecules constantly collide with nitrogen and oxygen molecules to equalize temperatures, which is just another cooling process. Are the hoaxers now claiming that CO2 emissions cause more CO2 molecules in the lower atmosphere to collide with “other molecules” and cause global warming? The collisions help cool not heat the atmosphere. Like they said in Smokey and the Bandit, The welcome mat is out and you’re coming home.
96% of IPCC scientists allegedly push the -80C CO2 warming scam, so let’s cut off 96% of the funding and keep our money. After being fired the IPCC fake scientists can retrain for real careers like plumbing, hair styling, food service, and truck driving.
http://www.historyscoper.com/mycousinco2.html
My reply:
[[Our results show that in the high atmosphere above Antarctica, carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases do not have the warming effect they do in the lower atmosphere (by colliding with other molecules). Instead the excess energy is radiated to space, causing a cooling effect.]]
How long can the leftist-run U.N. IPCC keep getting away with their sick fake physics CO2 global warming hoax?
CO2 absorbs radiation at 15 microns, which has a Planck radiation temperature of -80C = 193K = -112F, which can’t melt an ice cube, whose Planck radiation max wavelength by the way is 10.6 microns.
CO2’s other absorption wavelengths are 2.7 microns and 4.3 microns. 2.7 microns corresponds to a Planck radiation temperature of 797C (1070K) (1466F), and 4.3 microns corresponds to one of 401C (675K) (755F), neither of which the Earth’s surface is capable of reaching outside of volcanoes.
Actually, those short wavelengths are found in the sunlight in the stratosphere, allowing CO2 molecules to absorb and block that energy from reaching the surface. You can call it a cooling effect if you want, but what’s really cooled is the surface.
Never can CO2 heat anything, period. -80C isn’t heat. Cold isn’t heat. Cold is cold. Therefore, we never have to worry about CO2 emissions, and any attempt to punish anybody for them is a scam.
Notice the comment “by colliding with other molecules”. As 0.04% of the atmosphere CO2 molecules constantly collide with nitrogen and oxygen molecules to equalize temperatures, which is just another cooling process. Are the hoaxers now claiming that CO2 emissions cause more CO2 molecules in the lower atmosphere to collide with “other molecules” and cause global warming? The collisions help cool not heat the atmosphere. Like they said in Smokey and the Bandit, The welcome mat is out and you’re coming home.
96% of IPCC scientists allegedly push the -80C CO2 warming scam, so let’s cut off 96% of the funding and keep our money. After being fired the IPCC fake scientists can retrain for real careers like plumbing, hair styling, food service, and truck driving.
http://www.historyscoper.com/mycousinco2.html
Saturday, August 22, 2020
Friday, August 21, 2020
Thursday, August 20, 2020
Wednesday, August 19, 2020
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Monday, August 17, 2020
Sunday, August 16, 2020
Saturday, August 15, 2020
Friday, August 14, 2020
Thursday, August 13, 2020
Wednesday, August 12, 2020
Tuesday, August 11, 2020
Monday, August 10, 2020
Undeniable Truths
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/08/09/undeniable-truths/
My reply:
Back in 1956 Gilbert N. Plass discovered that atmospheric CO2's 15 micron radiation absorption wavelength exists in a hole in the H20 absorption wavelength, causing him to go off on a tangent and conclude that the average surface temperature of the earth increases 3.6° C if the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is doubled, coining the term "climate change".
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1956.tb01206.x
The term "global warming" was coined in 1975 by Wally Broecker.
https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu//files/2009/10/broeckerglobalwarming75.pdf
After the global environmental leftists at the U.N. took over the field, they founded the Intergovernmental Panel on CLIMATE CHANGE in 1988 in league with their fifth column in the U.S. headed by Al Gore. Realizing by then that "trapping" IR in the sky doesn't do anything for the temperature back at the surface, they began pushing the CO2 back radiation hoax, that CO2 doesn't trap IR but reemits it back to the surface where it heats things up.
This is where the greatest hoax in modern science got started. It's still going strong despite being totally based on fake physics because 15 microns has a Planck temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice, which isn't even heat. Hence CO2 can't absorb or emit heat. Only the Sun heats the Earth's surface. All the real heat caused by solar radiation (-50C to +50C) is cooled by natural processes of convection-evaporation and radiation. The U.N. IPCC picked the wrong getaway driver. This hoax's days are numbered, despite their machine's colossal political momentum wielding it as their ultimate leftist tool to end capitalism.
http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html
An associated hoax is the claim that without atmospheric CO2 supplying 33C of temperature the Sun alone couldn't keep the Earth from freezing. This can't be true since CO2 can't melt an ice cube, and indeed the real reason there is a 33C increase in surface temperature over an atmosphere-less Moon was derived long ago by Maxwell and Feynman, not by using radiation physics, but by using statistical mechanics, and is solely a consequence of gravity, atmospheric mass, pressure, density, and heat capacities, and not dependent on "trapped IR radiation" in atmospheric CO2. Each day the excess surface heat is either radiated or convects toward space, in the latter case pulling cooler air down to take its place until it dissipates by converting to work to expand against decreasing pressure. The permanent lapse rate just moves extra solar heat along a conveyor belt to space.
https://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2015/07/physicist-richard-feynman-proved.html
The CO2 climate issue is really that simple. Weather is what's so complex nobody can predict it.
My reply:
Back in 1956 Gilbert N. Plass discovered that atmospheric CO2's 15 micron radiation absorption wavelength exists in a hole in the H20 absorption wavelength, causing him to go off on a tangent and conclude that the average surface temperature of the earth increases 3.6° C if the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is doubled, coining the term "climate change".
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1956.tb01206.x
The term "global warming" was coined in 1975 by Wally Broecker.
https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu//files/2009/10/broeckerglobalwarming75.pdf
After the global environmental leftists at the U.N. took over the field, they founded the Intergovernmental Panel on CLIMATE CHANGE in 1988 in league with their fifth column in the U.S. headed by Al Gore. Realizing by then that "trapping" IR in the sky doesn't do anything for the temperature back at the surface, they began pushing the CO2 back radiation hoax, that CO2 doesn't trap IR but reemits it back to the surface where it heats things up.
This is where the greatest hoax in modern science got started. It's still going strong despite being totally based on fake physics because 15 microns has a Planck temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice, which isn't even heat. Hence CO2 can't absorb or emit heat. Only the Sun heats the Earth's surface. All the real heat caused by solar radiation (-50C to +50C) is cooled by natural processes of convection-evaporation and radiation. The U.N. IPCC picked the wrong getaway driver. This hoax's days are numbered, despite their machine's colossal political momentum wielding it as their ultimate leftist tool to end capitalism.
http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html
An associated hoax is the claim that without atmospheric CO2 supplying 33C of temperature the Sun alone couldn't keep the Earth from freezing. This can't be true since CO2 can't melt an ice cube, and indeed the real reason there is a 33C increase in surface temperature over an atmosphere-less Moon was derived long ago by Maxwell and Feynman, not by using radiation physics, but by using statistical mechanics, and is solely a consequence of gravity, atmospheric mass, pressure, density, and heat capacities, and not dependent on "trapped IR radiation" in atmospheric CO2. Each day the excess surface heat is either radiated or convects toward space, in the latter case pulling cooler air down to take its place until it dissipates by converting to work to expand against decreasing pressure. The permanent lapse rate just moves extra solar heat along a conveyor belt to space.
https://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2015/07/physicist-richard-feynman-proved.html
The CO2 climate issue is really that simple. Weather is what's so complex nobody can predict it.
How scientists calculate climate change | The Economist (video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSGorwtY-zM
Reply:
The CO2-driven global warming theory is a gigantic fake physics hoax run by the globalist Marxists at the U.N. and its IPCC. It consists of fake physics framing CO2 emissions as evil, combined with fake world average temperature data that tries to blow a tiny amount of claimed warming that's within measurement error out of proportion and predict coming Armageddon if they aren't given power now. The truth is that CO2 can't melt an ice cube because it can only radiate energy at a 15 micron wavelength, which has a Planck temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice. Cold isn't heat, and cold can't heat anything. CO2 can't absorb heat and can't emit it. It's basic radiation physics, which the IPCC doesn't want the public to understand. Instead, they're supposed to believe in "models", which all have subroutines framing CO2 on causing global warming, a pure case of circular reasoning. The problem that the models constantly overpredict temperatures doesn't stop them from being pushed as gospel. I did the math about CO2 here so nobody has to be fooled any longer: http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html
Reply:
The CO2-driven global warming theory is a gigantic fake physics hoax run by the globalist Marxists at the U.N. and its IPCC. It consists of fake physics framing CO2 emissions as evil, combined with fake world average temperature data that tries to blow a tiny amount of claimed warming that's within measurement error out of proportion and predict coming Armageddon if they aren't given power now. The truth is that CO2 can't melt an ice cube because it can only radiate energy at a 15 micron wavelength, which has a Planck temperature of -80C, colder than dry ice. Cold isn't heat, and cold can't heat anything. CO2 can't absorb heat and can't emit it. It's basic radiation physics, which the IPCC doesn't want the public to understand. Instead, they're supposed to believe in "models", which all have subroutines framing CO2 on causing global warming, a pure case of circular reasoning. The problem that the models constantly overpredict temperatures doesn't stop them from being pushed as gospel. I did the math about CO2 here so nobody has to be fooled any longer: http://www.historyscoper.com/thebiglieaboutco2.html