https://www.theepochtimes.com/how-climate-change-pseudoscience-became-publicly-accepted_3093372.html
The global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC/WEF octopus of anti-Big Oil leftists is trying to eat the world by weaponizing the fake greenhouse effect. Global warming is good not bad, and more not less CO2 and H20 need to be pumped into the atmosphere to create more living space and food supplies.
Monday, September 30, 2019
Sunday, September 29, 2019
Saturday, September 28, 2019
Friday, September 27, 2019
Thursday, September 26, 2019
Wednesday, September 25, 2019
Tuesday, September 24, 2019
Monday, September 23, 2019
Sunday, September 22, 2019
Saturday, September 21, 2019
Friday, September 20, 2019
Thursday, September 19, 2019
Wednesday, September 18, 2019
Tuesday, September 17, 2019
Monday, September 16, 2019
Sunday, September 15, 2019
How can we solve the climate change problem without a global totalitarian government, that would use military force against any country that doesn’t conform?
https://www.quora.com/How-can-we-solve-the-climate-change-problem-without-a-global-totalitarian-government-that-would-use-military-force-against-any-country-that-doesn-t-conform/answer/TL-Winslow
A global totalitarian government couldn’t solve the climate change problem no matter how much power it has, because there really is no problem and CO2-driven global warming is a hoax, but it sure could use military force against rebel countries, probably the U.S., perhaps sparking nuclear Armageddon while disastrously damaging the Earth and depopulating it. Let’s hope the evil U.S.-hating capitalism-hating globalist Marxist U.N. and its IPCC are foiled in their mad plans to foist Marxist world government by framing CO2 as causing the climate instead of the Sun, and we go back to the era when we didn’t even think we had any control over the climate other than the ability to cause nuclear winter with nukes, etc.
Edited version:
My reply:
A global totalitarian government couldn’t solve the climate change problem no matter how much power it has, because there really is no problem and CO2-driven global warming is a hoax, but it sure could use military force against rebel countries, probably the U.S., perhaps sparking nuclear Armageddon while disastrously damaging the Earth and depopulating it. Let’s hope the evil U.S.-hating capitalism-hating globalist Marxist U.N. and its IPCC are foiled in their mad plans to foist Marxist world government by framing CO2 as causing the climate instead of the Sun, and we go back to the era when we didn’t even think we had any control over the climate other than the ability to cause nuclear winter with nukes, etc.
Edited version:
A global totalitarian government? How awful! Who would want that unless they were very very sick? And the only excuse is to “solve the climate change problem”? Gimme a break.
Sorry, a global totalitarian government run by the U.N. couldn’t solve the climate change problem no matter how much power it has, because there really is no problem and CO2-driven global warming is a hoax, but since nobody has ever ruled the whole world before, there’s sure to be countries that resist, and the world govt. sure could use military force against rebel countries, including nukes, disastrously damaging the Earth and depopulating it. No surprise, most globalist Marxists are Malthusians who consider overpopulation to be a bigger problem than anything, and would welcome a population reduction, especially of pesky racist Capitalist Americans like Donald Trump and his supporters.
Yes, the U.S. The most likely rebel country would probably be the U.S. which is strongly resisting the IPCC and its climate alarmist agitprop. Let’s hope the U.S.-hating capitalism-hating globalist Marxist U.N. and its IPCC are foiled in their plans to foist Marxist world government by framing CO2 as causing the climate instead of the Sun, the IPCC is dismantled, and we go back to the era when we didn’t even think we had any control over the climate other than the ability to cause nuclear winter with nukes, etc.
Sorry, a global totalitarian government run by the U.N. couldn’t solve the climate change problem no matter how much power it has, because there really is no problem and CO2-driven global warming is a hoax, but since nobody has ever ruled the whole world before, there’s sure to be countries that resist, and the world govt. sure could use military force against rebel countries, including nukes, disastrously damaging the Earth and depopulating it. No surprise, most globalist Marxists are Malthusians who consider overpopulation to be a bigger problem than anything, and would welcome a population reduction, especially of pesky racist Capitalist Americans like Donald Trump and his supporters.
Yes, the U.S. The most likely rebel country would probably be the U.S. which is strongly resisting the IPCC and its climate alarmist agitprop. Let’s hope the U.S.-hating capitalism-hating globalist Marxist U.N. and its IPCC are foiled in their plans to foist Marxist world government by framing CO2 as causing the climate instead of the Sun, the IPCC is dismantled, and we go back to the era when we didn’t even think we had any control over the climate other than the ability to cause nuclear winter with nukes, etc.
Saturday, September 14, 2019
Why do people believe in climate change?
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-people-believe-in-climate-change
My reply:
The choice of the word believe is right-on. Due to the insidious influence of the globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC, CO2-driven global warming is now no longer a science but a religion, and yes, they push the need to believe in it and its boatload of kept scientists, academics, journalists, and politicans who are busy trying to gain power to foist world government and turn the world into a Marxist utopia with racial-social justice everywhere.
Of course they wanted that all along, which is why they began seizing on CO2 emissions as the hoax to push to get it, a perfect hoax since CO2 can’t be seen or felt, any natural extreme weather can be blown out of proportion to make people think climate Armageddon is just around the corner, and capitalism needs fossil fuels to keep us comfortable, affluent, and happy, which they can’t stand. That this also means a new Dark Ages for a thousand years they won’t mention or admit. They want it now, and the end justifies the means.
DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
Naomi Klein admits global warming is not about science but destroying capitalism
Actress Cara Delevingne: 'The World Will End' If Governments Don't Act on Climate Change
Were Climate Change A Religion It Would Be A Sham
People like me have been warning of the CO2 AGW hoax and the evil designs of the U.N. seemingly in vain since we’re drowned out by the massive IPCC agitprop machine. But the truth will win in the end.
TL Winslow's answer to What are scientists tired of hearing about global warming?
Of course they wanted that all along, which is why they began seizing on CO2 emissions as the hoax to push to get it, a perfect hoax since CO2 can’t be seen or felt, any natural extreme weather can be blown out of proportion to make people think climate Armageddon is just around the corner, and capitalism needs fossil fuels to keep us comfortable, affluent, and happy, which they can’t stand. That this also means a new Dark Ages for a thousand years they won’t mention or admit. They want it now, and the end justifies the means.
DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
Naomi Klein admits global warming is not about science but destroying capitalism
Actress Cara Delevingne: 'The World Will End' If Governments Don't Act on Climate Change
Were Climate Change A Religion It Would Be A Sham
People like me have been warning of the CO2 AGW hoax and the evil designs of the U.N. seemingly in vain since we’re drowned out by the massive IPCC agitprop machine. But the truth will win in the end.
TL Winslow's answer to What are scientists tired of hearing about global warming?
Friday, September 13, 2019
What are scientists tired of hearing about global warming?
https://www.quora.com/What-are-scientists-tired-of-hearing-about-global-warming
My reply:
I don’t know what scientists are tired of hearing about global warming, because they live in a closed community where skeptics and other boat rockers are tossed overboard so they can remain a happy family living mainly on lifetime govt. paychecks that are ever-growing as their masters in the globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC get more successful in pushing their CO2 AGW warming hoax and demand power be handed to them to save us, instead planning nothing of the sort, just world government with a whole different agenda of racial and social justice on an unprecedented scale, during which the promised climate Armageddon never arrives but people will be so enslaved they won’t know what’s real and what’s not anymore. Sad but true, but people like me who speak truth to power will likely either be gone or so marginalized that we will make John the Baptist (voice in the wilderness) look like a movie star even in the age of the Internet.
And no need to hear critical viewpoints.
Never will IPCC octopus scientists be forced to be put on the spot to debate the physics of CO2 greenhouse warming in a fair impartial forum with as good publicity as their climate alarmist agitprop gets, because they’re being turned into a sacred priesthood that’s too pure to even question without feeling soiled. That’s the most tragic aspect. They will win without a fair fight and usher in a new Dark Ages that might last a tho
DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
https://papundits.wordpress.com/2019/09/13/were-climate-change-a-religion-it-would-be-a-sham/
TL Winslow's answer to Is carbon dioxide really causing global warming or is it just a theory among others?
TL Winslow's answer to What is more accurate description of what is happening to the world weather systems? Is it Global warming or Climate change?
TL Winslow's answer to If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening?
And no need to hear critical viewpoints.
Never will IPCC octopus scientists be forced to be put on the spot to debate the physics of CO2 greenhouse warming in a fair impartial forum with as good publicity as their climate alarmist agitprop gets, because they’re being turned into a sacred priesthood that’s too pure to even question without feeling soiled. That’s the most tragic aspect. They will win without a fair fight and usher in a new Dark Ages that might last a tho
DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
https://papundits.wordpress.com/2019/09/13/were-climate-change-a-religion-it-would-be-a-sham/
TL Winslow's answer to Is carbon dioxide really causing global warming or is it just a theory among others?
TL Winslow's answer to What is more accurate description of what is happening to the world weather systems? Is it Global warming or Climate change?
TL Winslow's answer to If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening?
Thursday, September 12, 2019
Wednesday, September 11, 2019
Tuesday, September 10, 2019
How can global warming be considered a scientific fact?
https://www.quora.com/How-can-global-warming-be-considered-a-scientific-fact/
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/How-can-global-warming-be-considered-a-scientific-fact/answer/TL-Winslow
Global warming? You mean human-caused global warming due to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration, caused by the burning of fossil fuels? That’s not a scientific fact, and it’s not even a theory but just an hypothesis that’s been pushed for decades by the globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC octopus of kept scientists, academics, journalists, and politicians, with the goal of foisting world government after bilking the people into giving them power to fight the imaginary threat, when actually they’re the real threat to everything we hold dear starting with out happy comfortable affluent lifestyles. Like all Marxists, they can’t stand some people being poor while others are rich so they want to make everybody poor.
There Is NO Climate Emergency!
DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
To Take Down Fossil Fuels, We Must Abandon Capitalism
Sorry, the public is not biting, except for in areas of Europe where the Marxists overlords have destroyed freedom of speech like England. I answer this question in more detail in my Quora articles:
TL Winslow's answer to Why do so many people still believe climate change is a myth?
TL Winslow's answer to If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening?
TL Winslow's answer to Scientists for climate change have many proofs. Do Anti climate change scientists have any proofs of their own?
TL Winslow's answer to Are there any university Physics educated climate change skeptics who can definitively refute the 120 year old basis for Anthropogenic Global warming?
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/How-can-global-warming-be-considered-a-scientific-fact/answer/TL-Winslow
Global warming? You mean human-caused global warming due to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration, caused by the burning of fossil fuels? That’s not a scientific fact, and it’s not even a theory but just an hypothesis that’s been pushed for decades by the globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC octopus of kept scientists, academics, journalists, and politicians, with the goal of foisting world government after bilking the people into giving them power to fight the imaginary threat, when actually they’re the real threat to everything we hold dear starting with out happy comfortable affluent lifestyles. Like all Marxists, they can’t stand some people being poor while others are rich so they want to make everybody poor.
There Is NO Climate Emergency!
DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
To Take Down Fossil Fuels, We Must Abandon Capitalism
Sorry, the public is not biting, except for in areas of Europe where the Marxists overlords have destroyed freedom of speech like England. I answer this question in more detail in my Quora articles:
TL Winslow's answer to Why do so many people still believe climate change is a myth?
TL Winslow's answer to If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening?
TL Winslow's answer to Scientists for climate change have many proofs. Do Anti climate change scientists have any proofs of their own?
TL Winslow's answer to Are there any university Physics educated climate change skeptics who can definitively refute the 120 year old basis for Anthropogenic Global warming?
Monday, September 9, 2019
Sunday, September 8, 2019
What makes global warming such a complicated concept for people to understand?
https://www.quora.com/What-makes-global-warming-such-a-complicated-concept-for-people-to-understand
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/What-makes-global-warming-such-a-complicated-concept-for-people-to-understand/answer/TL-Winslow
The concept of global warming is easy to understand if you know that only the Sun can cause it by delivering more heat energy to the Earth, either by exploding more atomic bombs and/or because it’s getting closer to Earth and positioned just right. It’s the concept of atmospheric CO2 causing global warming not the Sun that is complicated, because like all con games it’s a shell game designed to push a political agenda of foisting Marxist world govt. by the U.S.-hating U.N. and its IPCC.
Let me make it simple. The hoaxers want you to accept the proven fact that a tube of pure CO2 in a lab that’s illuminated by an infrared lamp gets hotter than an identical tube containing pure air. That means that CO2 absorbs IR energy and because of its heat capacity increases in temperature somewhat.
What they don’t want you to understand is that CO2 in the atmosphere isn’t pure, it’s only 0.04% of the total, and is well-mixed with oxygen and nitrogen, hence if it heats up those other gases will steal its extra heat to equalize temperatures, the whole package becoming less dense and rising to space like a hot air balloon, ultimately wasting it. Never do they send the heat back to Earth’s surface where we live. Once it’s gone it’s gone, like a rock rolling down from a mountaintop.
So that’s the hoax, pretending that we should worry about heat way up in the sky that’s heading to space harmlessly, harping on the atmosphere being a greenhouse instead of telling you the truth that it’s a giant chimney whose purpose is to take the Sun’s heat to space and keep the climate livable. A typical hoax statement is that CO2 piles heat and warms the entire planet. What moose hockey. We don’t live way up in the sky, we live down on the surface.
The hoaxers even try to deny that heat doesn’t just radiate in the atmosphere but convects, that is, rises via buoyancy after heating up. They also try to deny that the heat transforms into work to create winds, storms, etc., further wasting itself even before it can be vented into space. In the hoaxers’ lala world the Earth has no atmosphere, it’s like the Moon, all pure radiation. I wish they’d all go there.
And they really stoop low to ignore or even deny the role water vapor plays in absorbing surface IR and turning it into freezing rain, snow, and hail that cools the surface retroactively more than the Sun heated it. Their CO2 greenhouse warming theory is literally all wet.
Back to radiation. Did they try to browbeat you with impressive-looking graphs of the Earth’s surface infrared radiation as seen from a satellite? There’s always a big notch around CO2’s absorption wavelength of 15 microns. Yes, a tiny amount of surface IR is emitted at 15 microns, less than 10% of the total. But infrared absorption in the sky tells us nothing about surface temperatures, does it?
After absorbing that IR, what happens to it? Obviously, it doesn’t reach space, else there wouldn’t be a notch in the graph. But does it return to the surface, or does it get wasted in the 99.96% bath of surrounding O2-N2 molecules, which aren’t shown on the graph, although HO2 molecules are, and studiously ignored? If CO2 could somehow reradiate the surface IR and it magically returned to the surface through the gauntlet of other molecules, it would be absorbed by the ground, partially replenishing the heat that originally went to the sky, slowing down the cooling process a tad (half what originally went up, that is less than 5%, which isn’t global warming it’s sales tax) but never warming it more than the Sun did in the first place, maybe the cold nights get a little less cold, who cares, we’re sleeping. But there’s no CO2 on the ground, it’s all in the sky, so if CO2 only sent IR back and forth to itself, it would end up rising to space, and there wouldn’t be a notch in the graph. Zonk! Hoax detector went off!
Read my free online essay that disproves the CO2 greenhouse warming hoax using physics and puts it to rest forever, if you’re brave enough to allow me to challenge your preconceived notions more than I already did and can handle some physics. None of the IPCC scientists is willing to debate the physics of their hoax, instead relying on tampering with historical temperature data to make a dragon in the sky appear out of the graphs, and also relying on the massive IPCC climate alarmist agitprop machine to scare the unscientific masses into coughing up billions and trillions and surrendering everything they love most including their happy comfortable fossil fueled lifestyles and even cheeseburgers. Don’t buy it. Like they used to say about drugs, Just Say No to the IPCC and its Green Deal.
TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THSQqsYvL9o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUR0LrSadkg
TL Winslow's answer to If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening?
TL Winslow's answer to What is more accurate description of what is happening to the world weather systems? Is it Global warming or Climate change?
TL Winslow's answer to Scientists for climate change have many proofs. Do Anti climate change scientists have any proofs of their own?
TL Winslow's answer to Are there any university Physics educated climate change skeptics who can definitively refute the 120 year old basis for Anthropogenic Global warming?
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/What-makes-global-warming-such-a-complicated-concept-for-people-to-understand/answer/TL-Winslow
The concept of global warming is easy to understand if you know that only the Sun can cause it by delivering more heat energy to the Earth, either by exploding more atomic bombs and/or because it’s getting closer to Earth and positioned just right. It’s the concept of atmospheric CO2 causing global warming not the Sun that is complicated, because like all con games it’s a shell game designed to push a political agenda of foisting Marxist world govt. by the U.S.-hating U.N. and its IPCC.
Let me make it simple. The hoaxers want you to accept the proven fact that a tube of pure CO2 in a lab that’s illuminated by an infrared lamp gets hotter than an identical tube containing pure air. That means that CO2 absorbs IR energy and because of its heat capacity increases in temperature somewhat.
What they don’t want you to understand is that CO2 in the atmosphere isn’t pure, it’s only 0.04% of the total, and is well-mixed with oxygen and nitrogen, hence if it heats up those other gases will steal its extra heat to equalize temperatures, the whole package becoming less dense and rising to space like a hot air balloon, ultimately wasting it. Never do they send the heat back to Earth’s surface where we live. Once it’s gone it’s gone, like a rock rolling down from a mountaintop.
So that’s the hoax, pretending that we should worry about heat way up in the sky that’s heading to space harmlessly, harping on the atmosphere being a greenhouse instead of telling you the truth that it’s a giant chimney whose purpose is to take the Sun’s heat to space and keep the climate livable. A typical hoax statement is that CO2 piles heat and warms the entire planet. What moose hockey. We don’t live way up in the sky, we live down on the surface.
The hoaxers even try to deny that heat doesn’t just radiate in the atmosphere but convects, that is, rises via buoyancy after heating up. They also try to deny that the heat transforms into work to create winds, storms, etc., further wasting itself even before it can be vented into space. In the hoaxers’ lala world the Earth has no atmosphere, it’s like the Moon, all pure radiation. I wish they’d all go there.
And they really stoop low to ignore or even deny the role water vapor plays in absorbing surface IR and turning it into freezing rain, snow, and hail that cools the surface retroactively more than the Sun heated it. Their CO2 greenhouse warming theory is literally all wet.
Back to radiation. Did they try to browbeat you with impressive-looking graphs of the Earth’s surface infrared radiation as seen from a satellite? There’s always a big notch around CO2’s absorption wavelength of 15 microns. Yes, a tiny amount of surface IR is emitted at 15 microns, less than 10% of the total. But infrared absorption in the sky tells us nothing about surface temperatures, does it?
After absorbing that IR, what happens to it? Obviously, it doesn’t reach space, else there wouldn’t be a notch in the graph. But does it return to the surface, or does it get wasted in the 99.96% bath of surrounding O2-N2 molecules, which aren’t shown on the graph, although HO2 molecules are, and studiously ignored? If CO2 could somehow reradiate the surface IR and it magically returned to the surface through the gauntlet of other molecules, it would be absorbed by the ground, partially replenishing the heat that originally went to the sky, slowing down the cooling process a tad (half what originally went up, that is less than 5%, which isn’t global warming it’s sales tax) but never warming it more than the Sun did in the first place, maybe the cold nights get a little less cold, who cares, we’re sleeping. But there’s no CO2 on the ground, it’s all in the sky, so if CO2 only sent IR back and forth to itself, it would end up rising to space, and there wouldn’t be a notch in the graph. Zonk! Hoax detector went off!
Read my free online essay that disproves the CO2 greenhouse warming hoax using physics and puts it to rest forever, if you’re brave enough to allow me to challenge your preconceived notions more than I already did and can handle some physics. None of the IPCC scientists is willing to debate the physics of their hoax, instead relying on tampering with historical temperature data to make a dragon in the sky appear out of the graphs, and also relying on the massive IPCC climate alarmist agitprop machine to scare the unscientific masses into coughing up billions and trillions and surrendering everything they love most including their happy comfortable fossil fueled lifestyles and even cheeseburgers. Don’t buy it. Like they used to say about drugs, Just Say No to the IPCC and its Green Deal.
TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THSQqsYvL9o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUR0LrSadkg
TL Winslow's answer to If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening?
TL Winslow's answer to What is more accurate description of what is happening to the world weather systems? Is it Global warming or Climate change?
TL Winslow's answer to Scientists for climate change have many proofs. Do Anti climate change scientists have any proofs of their own?
TL Winslow's answer to Are there any university Physics educated climate change skeptics who can definitively refute the 120 year old basis for Anthropogenic Global warming?
Saturday, September 7, 2019
Friday, September 6, 2019
How is global warming affecting Greenland's glaciers?
https://www.quora.com/How-is-global-warming-affecting-Greenlands-glaciers
Sorry, there is no real global warming. It’s a hoax perpetrated by the octopus of caged hen scientists, academics, and journalists under control of the globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC. As usual, reality is twisted to fit their narrative so they can pretend to be our knight in shining armor by grabbing power to save us.
[[The enviro-socialist “climate emergency” crowd was busy earlier this month trying to launch the human equivalent of a cattle stampede by getting people to plunge into socialism to avoid bad weather.
There were headlines such as “Greenland is on track to lose most ice on record this year and has already shed 250 billion tons.”
It turns out that this amount of water is equal to slightly more than 60 cubic miles. The total volume of water in the world’s oceans is approximately 320 million cubic miles.
If we divide the 60 cubic miles of water added by the ice melt in Greenland by the 320 million cubic miles of water already in the oceans, the result is 0.0000001875. This is the relative increase in the volume of water in the oceans.
The absolute increase is the relative increase times the pre-existing average depth of the oceans, which is approximately 12,100 feet (idem), or equivalently, in terms of inches, 145,200 inches. The results of these multiplications are .0023 feet and .027 inches. That’s 23 ten-thousandths of a foot and 27 one-thousandths of an inch.
To put these numbers in proper perspective, recall that a quarter of an inch is 250 one-thousandths of an inch. So, what the media were trying to frighten us with is a rise in the sea level of little more than a tenth of a quarter of an inch (i.e., .027/.250).
And let us not forget that much or most of the 60 cubic miles of melted ice from Greenland will refreeze come Winter.]]
We Need Markets to Cope with Climate Change | George Reisman
There’s plenty of information out there to dispel the myth of melting Greenland glaciers caused by CO2-driven climate change:
What Greenland Heatwave?
Climate Analysis: What's Really Going On In Greenland | PSI Intl
Daily Mirror’s Pack Of Lies About Greenland Meltdown
Greenland Meltdown Hoax
Greenland Ice sheet Meltdown Scare–Except It’s Not True
Greenland Ice-Loss Predictions Are Clouded By Clouds | PSI Intl
Danish Climate Body Wrongly Reported Greenland's Heat Record | PSI Intl
Fake “Heatwave for Greenland” Claims
Greenland Ice-Loss Predictions Are Clouded By Clouds | PSI Intl
Greenland Temperature Data For 2018
For Most Of The Last 10,000 Years, Greenland Ice Sheet Was Smaller Than Today
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yqmez68DMMc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7wrRmJ8n5w
My reply:
Sorry, there is no real global warming. It’s a hoax perpetrated by the octopus of caged hen scientists, academics, and journalists under control of the globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC. As usual, reality is twisted to fit their narrative so they can pretend to be our knight in shining armor by grabbing power to save us.
[[The enviro-socialist “climate emergency” crowd was busy earlier this month trying to launch the human equivalent of a cattle stampede by getting people to plunge into socialism to avoid bad weather.
There were headlines such as “Greenland is on track to lose most ice on record this year and has already shed 250 billion tons.”
It turns out that this amount of water is equal to slightly more than 60 cubic miles. The total volume of water in the world’s oceans is approximately 320 million cubic miles.
If we divide the 60 cubic miles of water added by the ice melt in Greenland by the 320 million cubic miles of water already in the oceans, the result is 0.0000001875. This is the relative increase in the volume of water in the oceans.
The absolute increase is the relative increase times the pre-existing average depth of the oceans, which is approximately 12,100 feet (idem), or equivalently, in terms of inches, 145,200 inches. The results of these multiplications are .0023 feet and .027 inches. That’s 23 ten-thousandths of a foot and 27 one-thousandths of an inch.
To put these numbers in proper perspective, recall that a quarter of an inch is 250 one-thousandths of an inch. So, what the media were trying to frighten us with is a rise in the sea level of little more than a tenth of a quarter of an inch (i.e., .027/.250).
And let us not forget that much or most of the 60 cubic miles of melted ice from Greenland will refreeze come Winter.]]
We Need Markets to Cope with Climate Change | George Reisman
There’s plenty of information out there to dispel the myth of melting Greenland glaciers caused by CO2-driven climate change:
What Greenland Heatwave?
Climate Analysis: What's Really Going On In Greenland | PSI Intl
Daily Mirror’s Pack Of Lies About Greenland Meltdown
Greenland Meltdown Hoax
Greenland Ice sheet Meltdown Scare–Except It’s Not True
Greenland Ice-Loss Predictions Are Clouded By Clouds | PSI Intl
Danish Climate Body Wrongly Reported Greenland's Heat Record | PSI Intl
Fake “Heatwave for Greenland” Claims
Greenland Ice-Loss Predictions Are Clouded By Clouds | PSI Intl
Greenland Temperature Data For 2018
For Most Of The Last 10,000 Years, Greenland Ice Sheet Was Smaller Than Today
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yqmez68DMMc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7wrRmJ8n5w
Thursday, September 5, 2019
Wednesday, September 4, 2019
Did humans cause Hurricane Dorian? Why or why not?
https://www.quora.com/Did-humans-cause-Hurricane-Dorian-Why-or-why-not?
My reply:
No, and the question is absurd. The tail doesn’t wag the dog, much less a tiny flea. The most the CO2 AGW scientists claim is that ocean temperatures have raised a wee bit (which is arguable), and that could possibly feed a hurricane, not cause one.
Are Category 4 and 5 hurricanes increasing in number?
Pacific Tropical Storms Near Record Lows… Atlantic Hurricanes Hampered | PSI Intl
TL Winslow's answer to Is the increase in natural disasters a result of global warming?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq1p0UUTJ3w
Are Category 4 and 5 hurricanes increasing in number?
Pacific Tropical Storms Near Record Lows… Atlantic Hurricanes Hampered | PSI Intl
TL Winslow's answer to Is the increase in natural disasters a result of global warming?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq1p0UUTJ3w
Is the USCRN temperature station network reliable?
https://www.quora.com/Is-the-USCRN-temperature-station-network-reliable/
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/Is-the-USCRN-temperature-station-network-reliable/answer/TL-Winslow
Yes, these new stations are very reliable, which is why they show no significant (within the data uncertainty) warming in 13 years ( trend = 0.6 ± 0.9 °C/decade). Too bad they don’t have data back to 1880 so we could see how badly NASA and NOAA tampered with it. Despite this, watch how the CO2 global warming hoaxer crowd tries to make a mountain out of a molehill and claim it’s Armageddon time just around the corner.
NOAA’s USCRN Revisited – no significant warming in the USA in 12 years
‘Hidden’ NOAA temperature data reveals that 6 of the last 9 months were below normal in the USA – and NOAA can’t even get June right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-vAcJ_HLpE
CFACT Undercover: Exposing radical UN sustainability conference
https://www.cfact.org/2019/08/27/cfact-undercover-exposing-radical-un-sustainability-conference/
My reply:
The globalist Marxist U.N. and its IPCC are filled with U.S.-hating bureaucrats who manage a stable of kept scientists, academics, and journalists who are trying to frame CO2 and the fossil fuel industry for threatening a climate Armageddon which they claim only they can rescue us from by giving them power to foist a world govt. It's actually a scientific hoax, because only the Sun can warm the Earth's surface, and CO2 just helps the rest of the atmosphere cool it by conducting the heat to space. The Earth's atmosphere isn't a greenhouse it's a giant chimney. There is thus nothing the U.N. can save us from. It can only hurt us by robbing the West and redistributing wealth to Africa, etc. to make everybody poor like all Marxists do. Too bad, the fossil fuel industry doesn't fight back by funding every scientist who promises to debunk the CO2 greenhouse warming theory, it limits its funding to political lobbying, and has even cut a deal with the environmentalists in order to get a piece of the renewable energy boondoggle. All so-called renewable energy (the energy, not the technology to utilize it) such as wind and solar power can promise humanity is poverty and starvation. They should instead be working for universally available nuclear power, but that's just it, that would allow population to keep increasing, and the super-powerful elitists who pull the strings don't want that, they want population reduction, particularly after their own shenanigans trigger a world war that can launder the crime. It's a sad time, and the few who are speaking truth to power are effectively sidelined so that the show can go on. Looking at it as a historyscoper would see it 500 years from now, I feel helpless to stop it but have to try.
http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html
My reply:
The globalist Marxist U.N. and its IPCC are filled with U.S.-hating bureaucrats who manage a stable of kept scientists, academics, and journalists who are trying to frame CO2 and the fossil fuel industry for threatening a climate Armageddon which they claim only they can rescue us from by giving them power to foist a world govt. It's actually a scientific hoax, because only the Sun can warm the Earth's surface, and CO2 just helps the rest of the atmosphere cool it by conducting the heat to space. The Earth's atmosphere isn't a greenhouse it's a giant chimney. There is thus nothing the U.N. can save us from. It can only hurt us by robbing the West and redistributing wealth to Africa, etc. to make everybody poor like all Marxists do. Too bad, the fossil fuel industry doesn't fight back by funding every scientist who promises to debunk the CO2 greenhouse warming theory, it limits its funding to political lobbying, and has even cut a deal with the environmentalists in order to get a piece of the renewable energy boondoggle. All so-called renewable energy (the energy, not the technology to utilize it) such as wind and solar power can promise humanity is poverty and starvation. They should instead be working for universally available nuclear power, but that's just it, that would allow population to keep increasing, and the super-powerful elitists who pull the strings don't want that, they want population reduction, particularly after their own shenanigans trigger a world war that can launder the crime. It's a sad time, and the few who are speaking truth to power are effectively sidelined so that the show can go on. Looking at it as a historyscoper would see it 500 years from now, I feel helpless to stop it but have to try.
http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html
Tuesday, September 3, 2019
Why do climate change deniers think they are smarter than some of the World's most respected scientists who say, warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities?
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-climate-change-deniers-think-they-are-smarter-than-some-of-the-Worlds-most-respected-scientists-who-say-warming-in-recent-decades-can-be-attributed-to-human-activities
Reply:
Sorry, but the smartest scientists are the renegade heretics who won’t buckle under to the gigantic globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC octopus and its horde of kept scientists and academics, who are all hell-bent on foisting world government using CO2 emissions as the emergency they need power to rescue us from. whether we vote for it or not. Actually, the climate science field is fake, and its degrees are all held by younger scientists who are trained not to think for themselves but to swallow the CO2-driven greenhouse warming theory without question. It’s the older, mainly retired atmospheric scientists who keep questioning it despite being ostracized and blacklisted by the IPCC octopus of media moguls.
Everybody knows that celebs who push climate alarmism don’t really believe in it, as evidenced by their private jets, mansions, and other high-consumption lifestyles. The Democrat presidential candidates all pretend to believe in climate alarmism, but actually don’t, as evidenced by refusal to debate on it.
Meanwhile the hardcore climate alarmists know that their kept scientists can’t survive a debate on the physics, and instead like to use children to do their dirty work, much like Palestinian terrorists, pushing fake temperature data and weather dressed up as climate and hoping to hear the cash registers ring.
DNC Fears Climate Debate
Klaus Tulipan's answer to What are some current signs that global warming is hurting our planet?
Study: Children Can Be Used To “Convince” Parents About Climate Change
Greta’s very corporate children’s crusade
Delingpole: Greta Thunberg – Patron Saint of the Age of Stupidity
The Personality Cult of Greta Thunberg
I answer this question more fully in my Quora articles:
TL Winslow's answer to Has there actually been a scientific debate over global warming?
TL Winslow's answer to If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening?
TL Winslow's answer to How much does the Sun contribute to global warming?
TL Winslow's answer to Are there any university Physics educated climate change skeptics who can
definitively refute the 120 year old basis for Anthropogenic Global warming?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14w8WC1I3S4
Everybody knows that celebs who push climate alarmism don’t really believe in it, as evidenced by their private jets, mansions, and other high-consumption lifestyles. The Democrat presidential candidates all pretend to believe in climate alarmism, but actually don’t, as evidenced by refusal to debate on it.
Meanwhile the hardcore climate alarmists know that their kept scientists can’t survive a debate on the physics, and instead like to use children to do their dirty work, much like Palestinian terrorists, pushing fake temperature data and weather dressed up as climate and hoping to hear the cash registers ring.
DNC Fears Climate Debate
Klaus Tulipan's answer to What are some current signs that global warming is hurting our planet?
Study: Children Can Be Used To “Convince” Parents About Climate Change
Greta’s very corporate children’s crusade
Delingpole: Greta Thunberg – Patron Saint of the Age of Stupidity
The Personality Cult of Greta Thunberg
I answer this question more fully in my Quora articles:
TL Winslow's answer to Has there actually been a scientific debate over global warming?
TL Winslow's answer to If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening?
TL Winslow's answer to How much does the Sun contribute to global warming?
TL Winslow's answer to Are there any university Physics educated climate change skeptics who can
definitively refute the 120 year old basis for Anthropogenic Global warming?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14w8WC1I3S4
Monday, September 2, 2019
Is the increase in natural disasters a result of global warming?
https://www.quora.com/Is-the-increase-in-natural-disasters-a-result-of-global-warming/
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/Is-the-increase-in-natural-disasters-a-result-of-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow
Why try to answer a question like this without studying the facts?
This is a tricky question, because many times the so-called increase in natural disasters is just a result of better reporting, and every year they become less deadly. Hurricanes, however, are becoming less frequent, but big ones are becoming more common, and damage is increasing due to the wealth buildup on the coasts. They are also more likely to stall near coasts. No, there is no consensus among scientists that anthropogenic global warming affects hurricanes.
Natural disasters used to be so much worse
Natural Disasters Aren’t Nearly As Dangerous As They Used To Be
Weather-related disasters are increasing
Hurricanes in America have become less frequent
No, global warming isn’t causing worse hurricanes
More Stalled Hurricanes And Less Wind Shear - Bad News For U.S. Coasts
Are Category 4 and 5 hurricanes increasing in number?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq1p0UUTJ3w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyGAGYfjHR4
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/Is-the-increase-in-natural-disasters-a-result-of-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow
Why try to answer a question like this without studying the facts?
This is a tricky question, because many times the so-called increase in natural disasters is just a result of better reporting, and every year they become less deadly. Hurricanes, however, are becoming less frequent, but big ones are becoming more common, and damage is increasing due to the wealth buildup on the coasts. They are also more likely to stall near coasts. No, there is no consensus among scientists that anthropogenic global warming affects hurricanes.
Natural disasters used to be so much worse
Natural Disasters Aren’t Nearly As Dangerous As They Used To Be
Weather-related disasters are increasing
Hurricanes in America have become less frequent
No, global warming isn’t causing worse hurricanes
More Stalled Hurricanes And Less Wind Shear - Bad News For U.S. Coasts
Are Category 4 and 5 hurricanes increasing in number?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq1p0UUTJ3w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyGAGYfjHR4
Sunday, September 1, 2019
What is the most critical aspect of Climate Change which human's fail to understand?
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-most-critical-aspect-of-Climate-Change-which-humans-fail-to-understand
My reply:
By climate change do you really mean global warming? It couldn’t be global cooling, I’m sure. Sorry, but the most critical aspect you need to understand is that there is no real measurable global warming. NASA only claims 0.8C since 1880, based on computer statistics fed by unreliable temperature measurement stations that are juiced beyond their data uncertainty.
Why are you so scared of the future? Have you been snowed by the reams of lying CLIMATE ALARMIST agitprop churned out by the globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC octopus? The 1930s suffered a far worse heat wave than we have now, yet atmospheric CO2 levels were way lower, and it went away on its own. This is the difference between climate and mere weather, which is unpredictable. What the IPCC has been doing is projecting runaway global warming decades down the road based on predicted higher atmospheric CO2 levels alone, which isn’t scientific it’s fortune-telling and not worth warm spit. Meanwhile they’re putting their hands out and demanding trillions to shut down the fossil fuel industry and capitalism itself now, with no refunds promised. No surprise, every bitter winter cold spell is hand-waved as they wait for summer to turn it up.
World of Change: Global Temperatures
Climate Alarmism is the Left's Apocalypticism • by Gary DeMar • The American Vision
Climate Alarmism Is Still Bizarre, Dogmatic, Intolerant
The Heat Waves Of The 1930’s
DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
To Take Down Fossil Fuels, We Must Abandon Capitalism
Bernie’s $16 Trillion Green New Deal — $150,000 Per Household
170 Media Outlets Join CJR, ‘The Nation’ Climate Coverage Plan
Why is the CO2 greenhouse warming a scientific hoax pushed for ulterior motives, namely Marxist world government? See my Quora answers:
TL Winslow's answer to Why do so many people still believe climate change is a myth?
TL Winslow's answer to If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening?
TL Winslow's answer to Has there actually been a scientific debate over global warming?
TL Winslow's answer to Are there any university Physics educated climate change skeptics who can definitively refute the 120 year old basis for Anthropogenic Global warming?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THSQqsYvL9o
Why are you so scared of the future? Have you been snowed by the reams of lying CLIMATE ALARMIST agitprop churned out by the globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC octopus? The 1930s suffered a far worse heat wave than we have now, yet atmospheric CO2 levels were way lower, and it went away on its own. This is the difference between climate and mere weather, which is unpredictable. What the IPCC has been doing is projecting runaway global warming decades down the road based on predicted higher atmospheric CO2 levels alone, which isn’t scientific it’s fortune-telling and not worth warm spit. Meanwhile they’re putting their hands out and demanding trillions to shut down the fossil fuel industry and capitalism itself now, with no refunds promised. No surprise, every bitter winter cold spell is hand-waved as they wait for summer to turn it up.
World of Change: Global Temperatures
Climate Alarmism is the Left's Apocalypticism • by Gary DeMar • The American Vision
Climate Alarmism Is Still Bizarre, Dogmatic, Intolerant
The Heat Waves Of The 1930’s
DR TIM BALL MUST READ : Environmentalism – Evidence Suggests It Was Always And Only About Achieving World Government
To Take Down Fossil Fuels, We Must Abandon Capitalism
Bernie’s $16 Trillion Green New Deal — $150,000 Per Household
170 Media Outlets Join CJR, ‘The Nation’ Climate Coverage Plan
Why is the CO2 greenhouse warming a scientific hoax pushed for ulterior motives, namely Marxist world government? See my Quora answers:
TL Winslow's answer to Why do so many people still believe climate change is a myth?
TL Winslow's answer to If climate change is a hoax, why do so many scientists say it's happening?
TL Winslow's answer to Has there actually been a scientific debate over global warming?
TL Winslow's answer to Are there any university Physics educated climate change skeptics who can definitively refute the 120 year old basis for Anthropogenic Global warming?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THSQqsYvL9o