https://www.quora.com/If-man-made-climate-change-is-real-why-does-my-pastor-say-that-the-Bible-says-its-not
The global Marxist politician-run U.N. IPCC/WEF octopus of anti-Big Oil leftists is trying to eat the world by weaponizing the fake greenhouse effect. Global warming is good not bad, and more not less CO2 and H20 need to be pumped into the atmosphere to create more living space and food supplies.
Monday, December 31, 2018
Sunday, December 30, 2018
Is Earth getting warmer because of global warming from the Sun?
https://www.quora.com/Is-Earth-getting-warmer-because-of-global-warming-from-the-Sun
My reply:
Sorry, but the temperatures in the troposphere and stratosphere have nothing to do with the temperatures at the Earth’s surface. Only the Sun heats the surface, and the process of radiation and convection take it away to the infinite heat sink of space. On the Moon there is no atmosphere, so there is only radiation. On the Earth the gigantic atmosphere substitutes convection for most of the radiation, taking the heat away via convection, but slowly, because like anything with mass it takes time to heat or cool. But take it away it does, so any attempt to attribute rising surface temperatures to CO2 is moose hockey. Once surface heat has warmed the air, it gets lighter and rises, just like hose bubbles in an aquarium. The basic laws of Thermodynamics prohibit heat from flowing from a cooler to a warmer body, or from heat not degrading in quality at each transformation. There is no dragon in the sky. Like a poor street urchin freezing while viewing rich fat warm restaurant patrons through the window, no matter how much heat is in the atmosphere it’s never going to heat the surface back up, but on the contrary, the surface just keeps getting cooled more and more as convection does its work. The claimed itsy bitsy 0.1C global annual avg. warming per decade in the past are based on strained artificial equations that have no reality, and projections of coming Armageddon based on them are worthless. In short, CO2-driven global warming is a hoax perpetrated for political-economic reasons, and intelligent people can’t buy it. The record cold winter we’re now having doesn’t jive with the hoax.
2017–18 North American cold wave - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017%E2%80%9318_North_American_cold_wave)
It's Been One of the Most Miserable Starts to Winter on Record | The Weather Channel (https://weather.com/news/weather/news/2018-11-27-winter-misery-index-awssi-extreme-start-november-2018)
See my full explanation here: TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change
http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html
My reply:
Sorry, but the temperatures in the troposphere and stratosphere have nothing to do with the temperatures at the Earth’s surface. Only the Sun heats the surface, and the process of radiation and convection take it away to the infinite heat sink of space. On the Moon there is no atmosphere, so there is only radiation. On the Earth the gigantic atmosphere substitutes convection for most of the radiation, taking the heat away via convection, but slowly, because like anything with mass it takes time to heat or cool. But take it away it does, so any attempt to attribute rising surface temperatures to CO2 is moose hockey. Once surface heat has warmed the air, it gets lighter and rises, just like hose bubbles in an aquarium. The basic laws of Thermodynamics prohibit heat from flowing from a cooler to a warmer body, or from heat not degrading in quality at each transformation. There is no dragon in the sky. Like a poor street urchin freezing while viewing rich fat warm restaurant patrons through the window, no matter how much heat is in the atmosphere it’s never going to heat the surface back up, but on the contrary, the surface just keeps getting cooled more and more as convection does its work. The claimed itsy bitsy 0.1C global annual avg. warming per decade in the past are based on strained artificial equations that have no reality, and projections of coming Armageddon based on them are worthless. In short, CO2-driven global warming is a hoax perpetrated for political-economic reasons, and intelligent people can’t buy it. The record cold winter we’re now having doesn’t jive with the hoax.
2017–18 North American cold wave - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017%E2%80%9318_North_American_cold_wave)
It's Been One of the Most Miserable Starts to Winter on Record | The Weather Channel (https://weather.com/news/weather/news/2018-11-27-winter-misery-index-awssi-extreme-start-november-2018)
See my full explanation here: TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change
http://www.historyscoper.com/climatetlw.html
Saturday, December 29, 2018
Friday, December 28, 2018
Thursday, December 27, 2018
Wednesday, December 26, 2018
Tuesday, December 25, 2018
Monday, December 24, 2018
Sunday, December 23, 2018
Saturday, December 22, 2018
Friday, December 21, 2018
Thursday, December 20, 2018
Wednesday, December 19, 2018
Why do, especially, "highly-educated" people believe the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere causes heating? Have they never heard of dry ice?
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-especially-highly-educated-people-believe-the-concentration-of-carbon-dioxide-in-the-atmosphere-causes-heating-Have-they-never-heard-of-dry-ice
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-especially-highly-educated-people-believe-the-concentration-of-carbon-dioxide-in-the-atmosphere-causes-heating-Have-they-never-heard-of-dry-ice/answer/TL-Winslow
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-especially-highly-educated-people-believe-the-concentration-of-carbon-dioxide-in-the-atmosphere-causes-heating-Have-they-never-heard-of-dry-ice/answer/TL-Winslow
Tuesday, December 18, 2018
What will be the hardest adaption we will need to make a a species to survive global warming?
https://www.quora.com/What-will-be-the-hardest-adaption-we-will-need-to-make-a-a-species-to-survive-global-warming
https://www.quora.com/What-will-be-the-hardest-adaption-we-will-need-to-make-a-a-species-to-survive-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow
My reply:
We will need to gets some toupees with brains in them. :) Haven’t you figured out by now that “global warming” is a hoax based on manipulating artificial “global temperatures” that have no reality outside a computer? Nature knows nothing of such a made-up statistic, and to use it as an indicator of the health of Earth is junk science. The reason for the hoax is to extort trillions to save us from it, with the real goal being to destroy the fossil fuel industry and capitalism itself. Mere weather can be twisted to look like climate change at will in a no-lose proposition where hot and cold spells are equally useful. That’s why it is a favorite with global Marxists in the U.N. and its IPCC.
It is all based on the logical fallacy called Reification, the Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness, a mental process by which someone comes to believe that an abstraction (idea or concept) is a material, physical object in the real world. Cambridge geologist Mike Hulme observed that many people are obsessing over global temperatures while not realizing that they are abstractions and not things to be feared.
“Global temperature does not cause anything to happen. It has no material agency. It is an abstract proxy for the aggregated accumulation of heat in the surface boundary layer of the planet. It is far removed from revealing the physical realities of meteorological hazards occurring in particular places. And forecasts of global temperature threshold exceedance are even further removed from actionable early warning information upon which disaster risk management systems can work.
Global temperature offers the ultimate view of the planet—and of meteorological hazard—from nowhere.”
Read all about it here so I don’t have to repeat it:
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2018/12/18/obsessing-over-global-temperatures/
Here’s my take on global warming:
TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change
https://www.quora.com/What-will-be-the-hardest-adaption-we-will-need-to-make-a-a-species-to-survive-global-warming/answer/TL-Winslow
My reply:
We will need to gets some toupees with brains in them. :) Haven’t you figured out by now that “global warming” is a hoax based on manipulating artificial “global temperatures” that have no reality outside a computer? Nature knows nothing of such a made-up statistic, and to use it as an indicator of the health of Earth is junk science. The reason for the hoax is to extort trillions to save us from it, with the real goal being to destroy the fossil fuel industry and capitalism itself. Mere weather can be twisted to look like climate change at will in a no-lose proposition where hot and cold spells are equally useful. That’s why it is a favorite with global Marxists in the U.N. and its IPCC.
It is all based on the logical fallacy called Reification, the Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness, a mental process by which someone comes to believe that an abstraction (idea or concept) is a material, physical object in the real world. Cambridge geologist Mike Hulme observed that many people are obsessing over global temperatures while not realizing that they are abstractions and not things to be feared.
“Global temperature does not cause anything to happen. It has no material agency. It is an abstract proxy for the aggregated accumulation of heat in the surface boundary layer of the planet. It is far removed from revealing the physical realities of meteorological hazards occurring in particular places. And forecasts of global temperature threshold exceedance are even further removed from actionable early warning information upon which disaster risk management systems can work.
Global temperature offers the ultimate view of the planet—and of meteorological hazard—from nowhere.”
Read all about it here so I don’t have to repeat it:
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2018/12/18/obsessing-over-global-temperatures/
Here’s my take on global warming:
TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change
What do climate scientists wish people knew about climate change?
https://www.quora.com/What-do-climate-scientists-wish-people-knew-about-climate-change
My reply:
https://www.quora.com/What-do-climate-scientists-wish-people-knew-about-climate-change/answer/TL-Winslow
Let’s reverse the question. CO2 helps cool the Earth’s surface, not warm it. The so-called climate scientists confuse the air in the troposphere with the air near the surface, which is where weather is. What happens way up high can’t change the temperature of the surface other than to cool it more via wind and precipitation. The only thing that warms the surface is the Sun. Warmed air rises via convection, taking heat with it, and releases it eventually to the infinite heat sink of space. Thanks to the atmosphere, thermal radiation from the surface is superseded by convection, which climate scientists don’t ever seem to ‘get’. Take the Moon for example. It has to radiate all the heat, and since that process is fast, its temperature swings between extremes. The atmosphere has mass, thus it takes time to heat and cool, or more precisely, time to remove heat from the surface, and more time to release it to space. If the surface could somehow radiate all of its heat to space rather than convect it, and the CO2 in the atmosphere blocked and absorbed it all, that would only make it rise faster, like smoke in a chimney. It will never become a Dragon in the Sky the way climate scientists think, sorry, there’s no second Sun up there threatening to bring Armageddon.
In short, what smart people like moi know that climate scientists don’t is that the Earth isn’t a Greenhouse, it’s a Stovepipe, and CO2 is a boogey man and scapegoat used by leftists to try to shut down the fossil fuel industry that has brought us a comfortable lifestyle, filling them with hate since it’s one of the biggest successes of capitalism. What a colossal waste of so-called climate scientists educated beyond their intelligence to accept their moose hockey, whose only solution is to tax the people for trillions and end capitalism in order to slay an imaginary dragon, when even a fraction of that would help solve real problems like pollution, hunger, etc. Ironically, CO2 is good not bad. It’s plant food, and the more we can get into the atmosphere, the more the planet will green to feed the teeming billions. We need 1200 ppm not the current 400, and the climate will still be the same as long as the Sun itself doesn’t change, which no amount of tax money can do anything about.
Read my essay and get your head right:
TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change
Monday, December 17, 2018
Is climate change the newest contradiction of capitalism? It should have been obvious with the National Climate Assessment; it wasn’t.
https://medium.com/b-is-for-blog/is-climate-change-the-newest-contradiction-of-capitalism-ff5d072ae651
My reply:
My reply:
What contradiction in capitalism? Sorry, but resources aren’t limited, just check out some of the photos from the Hubble Telescope. On the contrary, Marxism is based on the contradiction that if the workers take over the factories from the capitalists, the factories are no longer capitalist. Usually the workers end up expecting a paycheck for doing a minimal job, causing the whole economy to tank and everybody to suffer, check out the history of the Soviet Union and Venezuela.
What climate change? The only one I’ve seen is one manufactured by global Marxists to justify destroying capitalism. CO2 is not a pollutant like CO and soot, what a con game. Right now the Marxists are making their big move by pointing to recent bad weather as the basis for future doomsday predictions about climate decades out so they can shut down capitalism now. They can’t lose if they can pull this off, because if the climate doesn’t really go into runaway they can take credit for it, and if it wouldn’t have done it anyway, who can prove it? Only I have spent the effort to scope the entire history of Earth’s climate and climate science, including the political shenanigans, and am offering the research free to all who really want to have knowledge and not just agitprop. I have nothing to hide and include all sides. It’s all free on my Historyscoper’s Climatescope, Google it, start studying it and get serious in 2019.
Sunday, December 16, 2018
How does methane contribute to global warming via positive feedback?
https://www.quora.com/How-does-methane-contribute-to-global-warming-via-positive-feedback
My reply:
Positive feedback? Sorry, but the so-called greenhouse warming theory is wrong because it assumes that just because CO2 and methane in the atmosphere block and trap infrared energy, they don’t really do that for long, they reemit it like a radio transmitter somehow, and send it all back to the surface in just as useful a form as they received it. This is bad physics, because the absorbed energy turns into kinetic energy, causing the way-outnumbered CO2 and methane molecules to bump into the surrounding O2 and N2 molecules and lose their heat, and those just heat up a little, losing their heat via the Wien Displacement Law, emitting very weak infrared radiation at even longer wavelengths.
Not only that, but the inverse square law reduces any radiation reaching the surface.
CO2 is only 0.04% of the atmosphere now, and even if doubled it would be less than 0.1%, which might heat the atmosphere some but can’t heat the surface any, sorry. Methane (CH4) is an even smaller fraction, .00017%. The atmosphere goes up for miles, and the truth is it’s function is to cool the surface heat deposited by the Sun by mainly replacing radiation (like on the Moon) with convection, and eventually dissipate it into the infinite heat sink of space, with its sheer mass keeping it from convecting the heat away instantly like radiation would, moderating the surface min/max temperatures within liveable limits, but never heating the surface more than the Sun did in the first place. On top of that, any heating of a gas in the atmosphere causes it to expand and cool adiabatically, which has already happened as it rose from the surface carrying heat away by convection. And even if a large mass of the atmosphere warmed from the Sun itself, CO2 and CH4 would absorb and block it from reaching the surface, heating the atmosphere not the surface, and the warmed trace gases would more likely cool the surface more by causing wind gradients that bring winds, rain, hail, and snow. Sorry, neither can cause a global runaway warming, although stormy weather is a possibility.
Here’s my take in full:
TLW's Two Cents Worth on Climate Change